V Sport

>>16144964
+ they stand out from the sea of 3-series and C-classes
+ I think they're more fun to drive than the 3-series and C-class

- fucking annoying glossy shit everywhere that gets fingerprints on it
- few physical buttons
- Interior not as good as the current C-class

File: 546b16a02a8be_-_2014-cadillac-cts-sedan-023-lg.jpg (120KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1280x720px

Impressively, the CTS Vsport clocked in a time of 8:14.10. By comparison, that puts it six seconds ahead of the first-gen CTS-V, but 15 seconds behind the second-gen CTS-V. That car put in a 7:59 back in 2009.

Want to know what else the new Vsport is faster than? The list includes: the Mercedes C55 AMG, the Series 2 Lotus Exige S, the Aston Martin DB9, the Porsche 911 (997), the BMW Z4 M Roadster and the Nissan Skyline GT-R R32. That's not exactly a list of Toyota Corollas.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/news/a5309/go-news-2014-cts-v-sport-nurburgring-lap/

Would be objectively better than ///M and ///AMG if the ATS-v came with a v8. The camaro is literally an ats-v now. With a na v8 the ats-v would officially beat the m3.

>>16144964
Shitty modern car design.

What do you want to know about it?

>>16144993
There is only a V-Sport trim for the XTS and CTS. The ATS only has the V trim which competes with the M3/M4.

File: magnetic-ride-control.jpg (165KB, 687x443px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 687x443px

>>16145273
>There is only a V-Sport trim for the XTS and CTS. The ATS only has the V trim which competes with the M3/M4.


That V-Sport trim package for the CTS consists of a pair of turbos, electronic locking diff and the magnet-o shocks. I handles like it is on rails.

>>16145300
I'm well aware of what my vehicle has. I was referring to anon who thought the C-class competes with the CTS or XTS.

>>16145326
>I'm well aware of what my vehicle has. I was referring to anon who thought the C-class competes with the CTS or XTS.

Aye, he'd be a lost soul.

>>16145332
Though the E and S class make the CTS, XTS and CT6 look like second rate luxury in comparison. The only value of Cadillac is their performance in comparison to the Germans.

>>16145108
But a V8 isn't """"""luxury""""""". A TTV6 is.

>>16145482
A TTV6 is riceshit. V8 or nothing.

>>16145019
Thanks kind, anon.

Rather have an Acura or Infinity than that piece of garbage.

>>16145568
Why?

>>16144964

thumbs up, I love them

>>16145482
Now youre just shitposting.

>>16144964
Both the interior and the exterior look ugly and cheap.

File: Screenshot_20161111-175633.jpg (1MB, 1215x1940px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1215x1940px

Britfag currently looking for a new car. Quite like the look of these, turns out they are available here.
>Starting price from £75k.
Lol, no fucking chance.

>>16147339
just buy the ordinary one you won't be dissapointed

File: 1409586262889.jpg (321KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 960x1280px

>>16147339
what the hell

someone explain why a CTS-V costs almost double if Meme5 in the UK

>>16147339
but thats 87k euros I think thats not bad

File: Screenshot_20161111-230201.jpg (1MB, 1295x1940px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1295x1940px

>>16148121
Ct6 is still ridiculously overpriced here.

>>16148350
How much is a comparable 7 series hort wheel base? Or an XJ short wheelbase?

>>16148160
import pricing i'm guessing
charge more because it's american in euroland

>>16147339

Big difference from the vanilla CTS, the CTS V Sport (Twin turbo v6 / 420hp) and the CTS-V (supercharged 6.2L / 640hp).

Your poster is a CTS-V. Not sure where you are going to get a car that has that much power, handles like it is on rails and is £75k.

>>16148350
>Ct6 is still ridiculously overpriced here.

CT6 is a limo and is overpriced. The CTS-v and V Sport are sports sedans and compete with the S5/S6/M5/M6. Different ball game.

File: Screenshot_20161111-232602.png (856KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

856KB, 1440x2560px

>>16148370
I guess this is the most comparable jag.

>>16148445
Why is the R model the most comparable though? The CT6 only comes with a TTV6

>>16148399
We only get the v sport. Obviously the model choice is less here. There's only 2 dealers in the whole of the UK for example. Pity, quite like cadillac as a brand.

>>16148453
My bad, I read your post as what would be comparable to the v sport not the ct6. Swb xj starts from about £60k.

>>16148476
Christ, they are a bit expensive over there aren't they

>>16148459

Buying a Vsport there is like buying a Jag. There are about as many dealers... It would be a very similar experience, really.

In the US, people buy the Jag to show that they are not following the heard to BMW/Audi/MB.

>>16146244
Not the same anon but let me pitch in.

Some of the first cars I was ever privileged enough to drive were a 95 3000gt VR-4 and an M package 540I. One with a 330 HP tt v6 and one with a fat German Na V8.

The feeling is just incomparable. No waiting for your turbos to work, no gimmicky 'active aerodynamic adjust', only being shoved back in your seat the very instant your foot shoves that pedal down.

I feel like in a luxury car, I should have that instant gratification available to me at any Rpm in any gear. Something a fat V8 can do, not a prissy Tt v-6

>>16148350
I mean't the cts without the V. anyway I hope you buy it fellow caddy yuropoor. Im currently saving up for an ats.