https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsH 7lZb9bP4 hey /o/ a pink

>>16111546
Like buying some pearls and re painting it myself.

>>16111546
>trump sticker

dropped

>>16111595
>>>/n/

>>16111546
I'd drive it
I want an old pickup to stroke my penor in

>>16111546
No better or no worse given that theres a shit load of that gen f150 them out there.

>>16111658
Trump would probably kill the US automotive industry through stupidity.

Clinton would be more likely to give it a loan.......

File: IMG_20160817_174015.jpg (799KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 1920x1080px

>>16111658
>no more trade with mexico (the wall included)
>no more mexican production of cars
>the average american can't afford to buy an american car
>production shrinks
>automaker needs another loan or goes belly up
MAGA

>>16111676
>reduce speed limits wherever possible
>increase "safety" and environmental regulations

>>16111738
it's not like you can market any car as being "less safe" than the last car they made.

>>16111721
Sounds good to me.

Beaner made Fusions and Focii are SHIT

>>16111750
>let's bring american jobs back to americans
>inadvertantly closes and shrinks the american job force and economy
MAGA

>>16111756
Odds are trump would be more likely to ship jobs overseas.

What he does and what he says he does are two opposite things.

>>16111802
I agree

>>16111748
You can sure as fuck market them as cheaper, faster and with better fuel economy - all of which they would gain by being less weighed down by safety shit.

>>16111802
>>16111817
Trump wants to run the US like it's a corporation and it's about time that starts happening before actual corporations take it over. If a few divisions have to go bankrupt in the process (airlines, banks) that's natural selection.

New foreign cars would get more expensive in the short term tho.

>>16112240
>cheaper, faster and with better fuel economy
sure you can say that, but why aren't mitsubishi mirages selling as well as the bigger, safer, more complicated and expensive civic and corolla

>run the US like it's a corporation
so your argument is that you want the us to be run like a corporation by a guy who runs a corporation, but not by other guys who run other corporations?

so do you want more american jobs or less? because what you are proposing would reduce the market and workforce, in turn shrinking the economy and basically artificially provoking a recession.

>>16112240
>Trump wants to run the US like it's a corporation and it's about time that starts happening before actual corporations take it over. If a few divisions have to go bankrupt in the process (airlines, banks) that's natural selection.

Funny you should say that, as there's a very good example as to why don't do that.

http://www.inc.com/erik-sherman/sears-ceo-eddie-lampert-should-stop-reading-ayn-rand.html

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-has-ayn-rands-day-20150204-column.html

http://evonomics.com/the-ceo-of-sears/

>>16112273
Are you suggesting we currently export more than we import? Because we don't, not even in the auto industry and the things we DO export tons of like corn will be pretty hard for other nations to do without.

>>16112276
Are you suggesting Trump is a fucking objectivist? Because it's pretty obvious he's not. Your example is why you shouldn't run a corporation like a nation not the other way around.

>>16112311
>Are you suggesting Trump is a fucking objectivist? Because it's pretty obvious he's not.

Yeah its pretty evident you have no clue how trump was raised, and oblivious to how he's behaved over the last 50 odd years of his life.