How much torq does o have?? Shitty getz 126Nm @ 3200rpm

>>16096424
>Nm

>>16096424
270@ ~3500

>>16096439
E46 328i btw

File: volvo-lanseaza-noul-xc70-drive-2-0-2012-diesel-cu-5-in-linie-si-160-de-cp-42303.jpg (148KB, 800x521px)

148KB, 800x521px

400Nm @1400rpm

Get on my level fucking |4 plebs

475 lb-ft@ 4200 rpm

195 / 2200

>>16096446
Get your tractor out of here, Billy-Bob

330Nm/240torks @ 3500RPM

Fiesta ST

Highest
450'lbs @ 1700 rpm (sold it)

Current
195 @ 2500 rpm

File: volvo_b5254t7.jpg (115KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 640x480px

Volvo B5254T7
32Nm 1500-4800 U/min

>>16096671
>32Nm
EDIT: 320Nm

File: BMW_M57D30TU.jpg (244KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 800x600px

>>16096446
500 Nm/2750 rpm

>>16096535
Nothing wrong with a big Diesel, especially when it sounds like this

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR-hnNTstL4

>>16096829
better quality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jlJMaDQ1WQ

>>16096424
510Nm(376lb-ft) @ 3000RPM

Guess the car.

>16nm
Wew. Tork demon.

File: 3fb5ef7d-b5d5-406d-b921-97820f3feed3..jpg (3MB, 4032x2268px)

3MB, 4032x2268px

450 ftlb @ 2300 rpm fuckers

also like 200 hp stock

>>16096849
>16mn @14,000 rpm
Forgot a bit of info

>>16096850
450 ftlbs @ 1600 rpm

>>16096424
447nm at 3600 rpm

>>16096841
C63 AMG

137 @ 4000

It's a classic
>lol fwd
>but muh handling
shitbox with the Japanese spec motor. Anyone care to guess?

File: hgdnhjtjy.jpg (660KB, 1024x753px)

660KB, 1024x753px

260lbft@2400rpm

>>16096919
Nope.
It's a 4banger FWD.

>>16096424
315@3400
It's time for a bigger cam.

>>16096940
Supra type spec 9?

156 ft·lbf @ 5,250 rpm

It has short gearing so it feels like a lot more.

617 Lb/ft (837 Nm) @ 2800 RPM

390 @ 4000

200 Nm, 147 ft-lb at 6000 rpm

File: IMG_2487_zps83d8949e.jpg (125KB, 768x1024px)

125KB, 768x1024px

1000nm @ 2000rpm
to the WHEELS

closer to 1200nm at the crank :)

File: 000.jpg (28KB, 601x508px)

28KB, 601x508px

120 Nm @ 2500 rpm

>>16097853
>1000nm @ 2000rpm
>to the WHEELS
>closer to 1200nm at the crank :)
Is it a W211 E400 CDI?

File: 4f01ed5a-09d5-4307-a674-4768ef33827e.large.jpg (99KB, 1199x900px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1199x900px

>>16097882
No

>>16096859
125ccm 2-stroke?

>>16097957
250 4 stroke

>>16097877
93 Nm @ 3600 rpm
and
4 Nm @ 4500rpm

265torks at something.

276 lbft @ idk
V6 tdi

File: 1477950180344.jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x500px

>>16096850
what engine is that nigger

File: 1600twinport3.jpg (43KB, 463x463px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 463x463px

147 Nm @ 3600rpm

Late 90's econobox tier.

>>16097993

a hemi of some sort prob

>>16096829

>2.0l
>big diesel

I know 2.0l is big to your average eurofag but even euro diesel techs look at 2.0l diesels as babby diesels.

182@2000
guess
hint: it's from the late '80s early '90s

98 lbs-ft at 4000. The 5.125 rear end helps a little

125 lbs-ft at 2400. This n/a diesel moves along 3 tons with the help of a 4.78:1 first gear and a 4.1:1 rear end and 24" tires.

File: ugly ass engine.jpg (22KB, 470x265px)

22KB, 470x265px

>>16096424
60Nm 58 bhp.

221 Nm at 4050
MX-5 NC

280@holyshittorquesteerzoomzoomboom

>>16098139
let me guess ... MS3?

120 at 9000 rpm :(

130 ft-lb @ 4600 RPM

>>16098163
Yup.

>>16098071
tarbo valvo

50 ish hp and 80 nm torq?
idk eurokuk box

File: IMG_3279 (2).jpg (4MB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5184x3456px

225WTQ at 4000RPM

210WHP

>>16096424
375 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm
and like, 300lb-ft at idle.

File: 77186-lifted-dually-20130302_130943.jpg (96KB, 852x639px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 852x639px

570@2000 rippems

File: 1476914250781.jpg (114KB, 600x529px)

114KB, 600x529px

>>16098691
Tasteful

File: 1477774627667.jpg (65KB, 400x388px)

65KB, 400x388px

>>16096996
Mah nigga

46 ft-lb at 10000 rpm.

File: IMG_20160923_221338.jpg (984KB, 2511x1344px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 2511x1344px

112.7 Nm @ 10,000
Wew lad

>>16096919
a c63 would have much much more torque

130 ft/lbs at 7600rpm.

Its okay, its not like I like torque or anything. Pls no bully.

284@ 5300rpm
2016 camaro

>>16096443
but the e46 328i has 280 Nm @ 3500

File: unedited2.jpg (75KB, 1090x614px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1090x614px

500Nm

breddy gud

>>16097552
3rd gen prelude

390 ft/lbs @ 4,250 rpm

>>16099065
Didn't think this thread would survive until I came back.
It's a SAAB Aero.

>>16099208
The 476HP C63 AMG is rated at 650Nm, 10 more than a Viper GTS with 450HP which is quite good for a much smaller engine.

>>16097659
Prelude?

>>16096424
~900Nm

>>16096424
430 NM at 1500 rpm

Hilux ftw

>>16097853
@Jason

208 Nm @ 3500
189 Nm @ 3500

200 ft-lb @ 2800 rpm

File: hyundai-i10-hatchback-special-editions-5door.jpg (15KB, 512x384px)

15KB, 512x384px

94nm

apparently "258 lb-ft @ 2000-5200 rpm" but I doubt the peak has that much of a range

File: IMG_9053.jpg (507KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 1080x1920px

492 to the wheels at this point in time. at Denver altitude with a DA of about 9000 on a 95 degree day. I've added some more stuff since then.

>>16097853
>1000Nm to the wheels
>1200Nm at the crank

So many wrong things with what you said is not even funny : ^ |

>>16098542
nope, good continent but wrong country
also it is a tarbo
[spoiler]not gasoline tho[/spoiler]
>>16100739
the Viper's engine is the definition of underexploited
it makes a meekly 400hp and 640nm with 8 liters but I'm sure that with some change it could make nearly 800hp and 750nm while N/A

>>16103946
The Viper engine is pushrod, retard. Of course it won't want to punch a ton of horsepower per displacement.

On the other hand, that means it's a lighter and more compact V10 than your typical DOHC one.

>>16104008
>pushrod engines can't make power
nice meme, what's next?
Carbs are unreliable and can't make power?

>>16104013
Here we go.

There are certain limitations pushrods can have, namely in the 2 valve design.
This has inherent limitations as compared to a 4 valve design due to surface area.

Also consider pushrods can limit overall RPM's. Hence the bump in displacement to compensate for this.

In later forms, Dodge did manage to very well-tune this engine (as GM has improved on their pushrod small-blocks as time has gone on) thanks to technological advancements.

And as I said, physically it still makes for a smaller and lighter engine, just there's more INTERNAL displacement.

>>16104013
>carbs
>reliable

Kek

>>16104058
No shit it's limited, but simply saying "lol pushrods can't make power" is both false and retarded, and there are plenty of pushrod engines that made good power. Examples would be Chevy's 302, which made around 360hp on the first versions to approx 400 in the later ones while revving at nearly 8k, Yuro and Jap L4s from the '70s/'80s backwards, which, when fed by good carbs and with a sharp cam, could fetch 7/8k rpm and 70/80hp/L (N/A of course) and I could go on for a while more.
Point being, it could make fuckton more HP, and with modern materials and engineering, design limitations are here mostly for absolutely massive amounts of HP, like on turbo/SC engines.
the very, very vast majority of american pushrod engines dont make power simply because they aren't tuned to, as a 5.0 can very lazily burp out 250hp, but it could be pushed to 400 without having to slap forced induction on it.
>>16104097
ha funy maymays

550ft/lbs and 404bhp. 2007 BMW 535D.

350 N·m (258 lb·ft) @ 1750-2500

>>16104117
but you could make easier and more reliable power/revolutions with a DOHC design..

Or go like Koenegsiegiegig and do the FreeCam?

File: 20160218_084425.jpg (2MB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1920px

150Nm @ 3900RPM


Fun fact: if your car makes less torque than it has displacement in cc/100 then it means it's shit
>>16096689
>diesel bmw
At least it's a 6 cyl

>>16104333
True, but the defining factor in engine reliability is usually the max RPM and average RPM an engine makes, hence why old pushrod engines are usually unkillable. but old SOHC engines are also unkillable because of low speeds too.
I'm fairly sure modern pushrod V8s can rev well without being fragile at all.
Freecam sounds interesting but I wouldnt dwelve into it cause I dont know anything about it and I wait to see what gives

360nm @ 4500

>>16104350
How is that a fact? That is just some bullshit that you made up.

Good ol' Xantia with a Peugeot engine (XU7JP4LFY for those who care)
109hp @ 5500rpm
155Nm @ 4250rpm (114lb.fts torkz things)

Pretty tall gears/final ratio, so it feels really slow under 2500rpm. My friends are used to driving diesels with tons of torque of idle so they don't like the fact that you can't just overtake by going WOT in 5th from behind a truck. I have no problem droping one or two gears, and I like the long ass 5th to cruise along in silence so I think it's sufficient for now.

>>16104350
1. pretty sure you meant displacement in cc /10 and not 100
2. this statement is tehn equivalent to "if your car makes less than 100Nm/L it's shit"
3. well the previous gen C class AMG has 6208cc and 600Nm so by that metric it's shit, and I don't think many will agree with that

>>16097853
so many filters

File: 8a562aaf-6d77-407a-9cd2-f495be5532c4..jpg (1MB, 2560x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1536px

>>16097993
rv 440

pic related is what it came out of

File: tmp_25916-1475816866063-853529077.jpg (55KB, 395x401px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 395x401px

>>16096850
>he didn't go with notched pistons

72ftlb/92nm @ 7.1k.

File: 1477716997334.jpg (67KB, 1024x578px)

67KB, 1024x578px

>>16104588
My dorito is safe at 279hp at 1.3L of displacement.

The god machine.

File: 1473181958947.jpg (70KB, 600x536px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x536px

>>16097853
considering buying one of these, what was the budget to get it to make such power? if you dont mind me askin

>>16106326
why does a dorito need dual exhaust.

>>16106416
Doritos produce alot of exhaust, thats why you see them running very large turbos, they can run a turbo thats bigger than the engine and not lag

400 ft/lbs at 2300 RPM [spoiler]and 240 HP[/spoiler]

God bless my bored out olds 403.

File: image_pic.jpg (64KB, 733x826px)

64KB, 733x826px

Get on my fucking level you plebs

76Nm at 3300 RPM.

File: IMG_0859.jpg (259KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1200x900px

132 Nm @ 2500
350 Nm @ 2000

File: engine.jpg (65KB, 800x600px)

65KB, 800x600px

320Nm/230ft lbs @ 1500
how fucked am i