ITT

File: c74671e071.jpg (203KB, 597x395px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 597x395px

Nah.

File: 380spaceballs.jpg (61KB, 456x395px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 456x395px

>>16071472

File: 378211.jpg (112KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 512x384px

>>16071472
Why don't they build these anymore?

File: 2013-Land-Rover-Range-Rover-sedan-Base-4dr-All-wheel-Drive-Photo-2.jpg (262KB, 2100x1386px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 2100x1386px

>>16071472

>>16071472
I would drive this

>>16071472
>>16071495
>>16071501
>>16071553

Why haven't more manufacturers made cars like this? Look sleek and futuristic, while having good visibility. These would sell in a heartbeat.

>>16071597
>Look sleek and futuristic, while having good visibility.

Plus, easier to push/tow because less weight.

>>16071472
Wouldnt that just be a rover?

>>16071794
nice

>>16071794

Looks like a Saab

>>16071862

It is a Saab.

>9-5 with a shooped Evoque front fascia

>>16071862
because it is a saab

>>16071597
>>16071495
This one is basically a Volvo 740...

>>16071906
>Volvo 740

is that the GOAT?

File: download.jpg (9KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 275x183px

>>16071844
They should re-release a good Rover

>>16072067
All RWD Volvos are GOAT m8!

>>16071472
A very unusual, weird and good thread. I now like the idea of a RR sedan.

>>16071597
this is basically the reasoning behind every cross over in the world. The Evoque, RX, X3, ML.

you guys are so incompetent it really hurts my heart.

>>16071605
under8ed

>>16074041
what's wrong with the evoque?

>>16072117
Utter dogshit.
>>16074041
None of them have the boxy look. Somebody bred female hatches with cuck SUV's and now we have crossovers. This is basically making a boxy 70's sedan but with modern features and manufacturing processes.

>>16076664
yeah rovers are still leylands and bits fall off them after 5 days, fuck off