Do you think this car is shit? Why? If you think so, IDGAF.

>>16064615
why even make this post?

Are you australian?

File: 1996_Porsche_911_993_GT2_-_Flickr_-_The_Car_Spy_(16).jpg (323KB, 1600x1050px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1600x1050px

Do you think this car is shit? Why?

If you think so, IDGAF.

>>16064615
It's not shit, but it's not good either. Kind of ugly too. Either slap a turbo on it and some real tires or sell it at a lower price. Right now is not worth.

I really like the styling on this thing. I'd never buy one, but they are pretty attractive cars and I smile when I see them on the road.

>>16064615
No power. But it's fairly cheap and you can throw it around corners. It sucks less with proper tires.

>>16064626
Turbo on the shitty high comp boxer blows it up. Just wait till they depreciate enough, buy one, and drop a 1UZ in.

I thought the pre refresh GT86 was at least decent looking but Jesus they fucked up bad on the refresh

BRZ still looks good though

>>16064615

That car looks horribly disgusted.

>>16065043
Being affordable puts it in reach of the lowest common denominator. What awaits it is a life of automatic transmissions, stance, and grape flavored vapor. It will never see a corner at speed.

It knows what sort of future awaits it.

>>16064998
I like the styling too. Think they look cool.

>>16065055

something like 2 out of every 3 gt86s sold are/have been manual, and they're one of the best entry level track cars out there. go to any trackday or hpde and you'll see more than a few of them

there are definitely a bunch of them owned by ricers/vapefags tho

>>16064998
You seem like a person who's happy at life. Good to see people with good minds here.

>>16065017
My bad, I forgot to mention that when I want a turbo version I want a real engine, not some 4 banger boxster

>slower than a V6 mustang
>the mustang without a IRS

KEK

>>16064615
>If you think so, IDGAF
Right, you care so little that you had to make a thread about it.

>>16065308
Do you even have a car?

>>16064615
How do I get myself a set of those wheels in the U.S.?

>>16065308
This

File: image.jpg (45KB, 651x332px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 651x332px

>>16064615
They still haven't fixed this, by the way.

>>16070231
>173whp
>sports car
kek

>>16070231
Just needs a header

>>16064615
yes

ugly

overpriced

200hp

>>16070250
At 26000 pounds I would except a car that works out of the box, not some POS that needs aftermarket parts to be decent.

File: 11281-2007-Volkswagen-GTI-Dyno.jpg (136KB, 1024x598px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1024x598px

>mfw a 10 y/o hatchback has more power at the wheels

>>16070268
I agree, just saying that it's not a hard problem to fix if you're willing to. The car begs to be modified anyway

>>16070286
>fwd

>>16070312
>damage control
And look at that! The 10 y/o hatchback doesn;t have a torque dip.
Toyota should stick to making econoboxes and hybrids.

>>16070255

This.

I was so underwhelmed with this car and the BRZ when I test drove them last year. IDGAF how it handles, 98% of the fags on here couldn't find it's limits and at the end of the day you're getting smoked by rusted out hatches on your commute to work.

Absolute garbage.

>>16070315
>subaru with a toyota badge

>>16070231
kek, glad I didn't fall for this meme

>>16070323
You race people on your way to work?
Maybe consider leaving 5-10 minutes earlier and chilling the fuck out like everyone else in the morning? Presuming you commute in the morning

>>16070312
it's faster around the track too

>>16070327
All Subaru did was give one of their failed engines to Toyota. And it shows.

>>16070334
>source.jpg

File: kek.png (206KB, 475x410px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 475x410px

>>16070342
BTFO BY A DIESEL HATCH

>>16070344
>memeing track times this hard

>>16070359
>"""""sports""""" car
>destroyed around track by a diesel hatchback

>>16070359
the damage control is unreal

>>16070344
>diesel golf almost twice as much torque
considering the disel golf right now

>>16070408
nah m8, only if you like revving to about 3000

>>16070447
not like it makes a difference if you rev higher in the brz, see >>16070231

>>16065017
>not dropping a 1JZ in it
What is wrong with you?

>>16070231
>""""""""200hp""""""""
>2017 model puts out an extra 5hp and 5nm of torque because of a revised aluminum intake manifold
>""""""""205hp""""""""

>>16070333
This

>>16070344
>check engine light

>>16070573
>destroyed by a family car powered by a diesel engine

Will toyobaru cucks ever recover?

>>16064622
those nice digits on such a shit pasta.