What is the best car ever made between 1990-2000? Pic related

File: 16256554_large.jpg (49KB, 750x510px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 750x510px

>>16034906
>slower
>than
>a
>corolla

>>16034906
Viper
95 Saleen mustang
civic hatchback
s2000
supr
240sx

File: rx7rzfrontleft.jpg (29KB, 754x372px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 754x372px

>>16034906
Rx7

>itt corolla vs e30

>>16034985
Corolla wins
/thread

>>16034963
Literally just a collection of meme cars

>Dorito waifu wasn't even mentioned

>>16034906
the e30 m3 was produced since the 80s not 90s

>>16034906
Mclaren F1 and FD Rx7

>>16035025
The most iconic cars of the decade

Anything else is just shit

the toyota corolla is the best selling car ever made in the world

File: image.jpg (142KB, 500x364px)

142KB, 500x364px

>>16035025
McLaren F1 and E36 M3*
>>16035041
because it is cheap

File: bmwbtfo.jpg (19KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 500x333px

>>16035050
>E36 M3
>slower than corolla
>>16035050
>because it is cheap
Because its good

>>16035080
corolla is fwd
bmw is rwd
rwd is better and more fun no matter if slower or faster
sorry try again

File: 14247543_10154338120981550_1007417874_o.jpg (124KB, 983x653px)

124KB, 983x653px

Your favorite one, of course. I like the R33 being the first Japanese car to break the 8 minute mark on the burgerking, but I own a E36 M3 because I like how it looks and drives.

File: 1476379029407.jpg (715KB, 3684x2165px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 3684x2165px

>>16035094
>rwd btfo by fwd
>corolla is fwd
Not always

File: tmp_7350-Fotor_1477011670394902080697783.jpg (1MB, 2200x2200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2200x2200px

Parked next to this e46, there was also an e30 just behind me before I turned the corner. How fortuitous.

>>16035097
the last decent (rwd) corolla was built in the 80s
the corollas the corolla autist keeps posting are boring fwd 4pot economobiles

File: 1996_ford_taurus_lx_rosemist.jpg (37KB, 380x285px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 380x285px

>>16035032
>The most iconic cars of the decade
ROFL

File: st185.jpg (35KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 480x360px

Showed up out of nowhere and beat the most successful rally car ever.
This car put japan on the map when it comes to WRC

File: _20151222_151336.jpg (58KB, 720x459px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 720x459px

>>16035102
>boring
Pft.
Bmws are soft boring luxury cars.
And arent even good at being luxury

>>16035117
you know the car is not a performance car when it does what your picture portrays lmao

File: image.jpg (505KB, 2048x1376px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 2048x1376px

>>16035117
this "soft luxury car" still has not been beat by any other vehicle in terms of outright motorsport victories though.

>>16035080
thar's not even an M3 in the background, look at the mirrors. Probably a 318i so it can compete in whatever pleb series this is

File: bmw-overcooked.jpg (25KB, 728x300px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 728x300px

>>16035125
>he says its boring
Proved its not
>he says its not a performance car
More so than a bmw

>>16035162
there are tons of videos of bmws crashing on the Nurburgring but I've yet to see a corolla drive or crash on the 'ring
guess why - nobody takes corollas racing but bimmers are trashed around tracks daily

File: 5e216b3269.jpg (58KB, 635x477px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 635x477px

>>16035192
>bimmers are trashed
Yup

File: ringedition.jpg (51KB, 800x415px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 800x415px

>>16035192
Literally a Nurburgring edition corolla

>>16035204
how many of them have actually been driven on the Nurburgring though?
zero? one?

File: endurance-24-hours-of-the-nurburgring-2015-149-toyota-team-thailand-toyota-corolla-altis-s.jpg (80KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 800x533px

>>16035211
>finished 6th and 7th in class for 24hr nurburgring

>>16035112
I meant "iconic performance cars" but yes, that is the 90's shitbox god machine

File: honda-nsx-dm-altas-prestaciones-p10.jpg (55KB, 1024x582px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1024x582px

>>16035592

>>16035015
>I was being serious

>>16035592
The last good Mercedes. Too bad they barely sold any Evos, and the regular 2.3-16v we all got in America was a dud compared to the E30 M3

The E55 AMG (W210/211) is alright too.

E36 M3.
FD RX7
MK4 Supra
NSX
S14
Probably some Porche


Good but not best
Mustang

>>16034906
I'd say the Honda NSX takes the overall first place

No, it was not a balls-to-the-wall, super-high-performance four wheeled spacecraft, and to me that's part of what makes it so good

It was competent in it's segment, even with cars that out-powered it, and despite the fact that you could do your daily commute and not get beat up (and most importantly, you wouldn't have as much downtime, since the car won't be constantly in the workshop having little things done to it or, say, getting it's engine pulled out for the 30k-miles-or-one-year timing belt change and water/oil pump inspections...)

Overall, it was excellent for what it was: a two door, two seat, mid-engine, RWD sports car, especially considering price (and it did all this while delivering long-term reliability, as well)

Although it wasn't the TU-160 of sports cars, breaking minds and world records left and right, it was a big game changer for many people and automakers (need I mention the influence it had on the original McLaren F1?)

>>16035785

Sure, if you're a fan of watching your Mercedes rust in front of your eyes.

>>16034975
literally this

>>16035927
>especially considering price
it was expensive af back in the day and outclassed by pretty much everything cheaper than it

File: pa16-r159-001-1.jpg (96KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 750x422px

;)

File: maserati-shamal.jpg (302KB, 1200x797px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1200x797px

>Ctrl+F Shamal
>0 results
I'm disappointed in you, /o/.

>>16036295
>Ctrl+F Shamal
why? this isnt a european citizen thread

>>16036299
The OP is a euro-only car and didn't specify USDM vehicles only.

>>16036272
>it was expensive af back in the day and outclassed by pretty much everything cheaper than it
For the first year or two after it came out the only things that could really compete were other expensive MR exotics and the R32 GTR.

Over the course of its production, though the MK4 Supra, FD, and VR4, and Corvette C5 came out, which were all cheaper and with similar or better performance.

>>16035133
Ash is the best wood in the world because bats made with it have hit more home runs than any other wood

Fiat Punto

File: pg9.jpg (315KB, 800x1083px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 800x1083px

>>16036568
Yep, pic related.

The E36 M3 was 240hp/3250lbs and cost $40k. The NSX was 290hp/3100lbs and cost $90k.

File: Capture+_2016-10-21-01-51-35.png (1MB, 1439x864px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1439x864px

This
Diablos
Amgs
90s were great
Love most European sports/supercars from that era

>>16036568
Performance wise, C4 corvettes drank the fuck out of its milkshake. You don't have to wait for a C4, you just have to find a C4 with the harsh suspension.

What made the NSX great was the experience, and the fact that it was styled such that the Tifosi couldn't ignore the fact that it was a cheaper, better car than a Ferrari.

Because they were ignoring the cars like the Supra, Corvette, 300zx, and 3000GT solely because they weren't MR.

The NSX didn't just perform at that mid 90s exotic level, it looked it, and it felt like it.

>>16035099

That e46 is completely ruined. But the e46 was always trash. e30 and e36 are far superior.

>>16036284

Jesus christ the F50 is such a runny blob compared to the F40. F50 did not age well.

File: 3262ffe1ef146374b46810f64d356436.jpg (347KB, 1200x900px)

347KB, 1200x900px

>oldschool Audi AWD
>Porsche tuned Audi I5
>practical because wagon

>>16036880
cars that break down every week arent practical.

File: e03aa3299145db738f470fd7dfde7944.jpg (356KB, 727x480px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 727x480px

>>16034963
>>16035821
>Supra

Correct. Though there are many acceptable answers here in this thread.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (211KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1920x1080px

>>16036897
Only direct answer is the car sitting furthest right in your pic.

>>16035050
E36 M3? Are you shitting me?

Heavier than the FD. Slower than the FD. Not nearly as tuneable as the FD. Doesn't handle as well as the FD.

Inb4 you post their ad stating it's the best handling car in America; that ad came out after the FD was discontinued in America. They literally had to wait for the FD to leave the states before they could publish that ad. Go fuck yourself.

I think the E36 is a cool looking car, but nothing comes close to the FD in terms of sexiness, except the E-type.

>>16037138
*considerably heavier than the FD
Also way harder to lose weight on the E36. You can strip an FD down to 2500 pounds and keep the interior, easy

>>16037097

oh wow, fwd shitbox

>>16037147
the gsx was awd and you can convert the gst to awd

>>16037138
did you even read what the E36 and F1 poster says?
that poster is about the euro M3 which came with nearly 100hp more than tbe US M3
and they released the "best handling car" poster after the c&d article was published
>>16036598

>>16037186
I know the E36 M3 came with a lot more power in Europe. It's still slower. The E46 euro spec CSL is still slower than the FD--in a straight line, nevermind a track. Neither handle as well, either, and are both much heavier and way more difficult to tune.

>>16034906

this thread is so fucking autistic it hurts.

Nobody cates about your fucking busrider doritos.

Any answer not saying Maclaren F1 is just plain wrong.

When it came out it was so fucking superior to anything that it hurt. Competitors needed ten years to get something in the same ballpark.

And I don't like maclarens, but to each their own.

File: image.png (239KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 750x1334px

>>16037187
According to lap times, the E46 CSL is 2 seconds faster around Tsukuba and faster for 0-60 and 1/4 mile times
And the Euro E36 M3 is 5 seconds faster on Phillip Island
Sure the RX7 is fast for 255hp but it's not faster than the M3, let alone the E46 CSL

>>16037211
Right, if you compare the slowest FD to the fastest M3s. The series 8 was pushing 300 horsepower, and everything before that was a constant improvement over the original 255. I don't think there are many lap times available for each (minor) revision, but maybe someone can post the pic where it bested the Supra, Porsche 911 turbo, et cetera on the track and skid pad

Plus, if we delve into modifications, you can up the boost on the FD for next to nothing. You need serious cash to even make another 20 horsepower out of either M3. Comparing completely stock cars favours the M3 because the FD was made to be tuned, it was literally an unstressed package with perfect everything (except vacuum system and cooling). Considering all that, it's pretty embarassing that the slowest FD, untouched, with the most restrictive, shitty and heavy exhaust system, can run with the M3 which is a finished product that cost over twice as much

File: typerstsukuba.png (252KB, 699x385px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 699x385px

>>16037211
dont cherry pick the slowest times please

>>16037245
those are the only ones I could find, sorry
>>16037230
a boosted E46 M3 CSL ran the Nurburgring in 7:22 10 years ago

>>16037300
Is that all you have to say? Boosting a CSL is fucking expensive, and it still weighs so much. I'd put money on an FD being able to beat that track time without spending more than 10 grand from stock.

Oh wait, that's already happened.

>less than 350 WHP
>almost 7 minutes
http://www.rx7club.com/rx-7-audio-visual-lounge-143/my-last-nurburgring-trip-almost-7-minute-lap-771701/

Less than 4 grand of mods on this car, most of that being coilovers

>>16035198
>X series BMW
I don't see anything wrong with this, it's literally trash

>>16037324
BMW fags on suicide watch. Can't beat a 1.3 liter Japanese car around the track they were DESIGNED ON

LOL

>>16037324
Bridge to gantry
That is not the full lap
Also FDs are not even so cheap anymore, they cost the same as E46 M3s now, even more so here in Europe - you literally can`t buy one here
Watch this E46 M3 (non-CSL, stock engine, slight weight reductions) lap Bridge to Gantry in 7:35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXKrqi46JC4

>>16037384
And this lightly modded E36 M3 3.0 ran BTG in 7:34
and it was up for sale for 22.000 euros
http://bridgetogantry.com/2/index.php/btg-laptimes/349-quick-bmw-e36-m3-7m34s
The RX7 is lovely but it is not a ''god machine'', you are underrating M3s.

>>16037168
That's not an Eclipse, you dumdum

The European spec e36 m3 and e36 m3 evo

File: 1476213447432.jpg (20KB, 326x352px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 326x352px

>>16037168
Lol you silly silly boy

>>16037147
You are dumb too

>>160368880
The i5 is extremely reliable and tough engine actually and it utilizes audis original quattro awd (no electronics). There are many AAN engines that have reached over 300k miles that have been upgraded to rs2 spec.

File: 1996_Porsche_911_993_GT2_-_Flickr_-_The_Car_Spy_(16).jpg (323KB, 1600x1050px)

323KB, 1600x1050px

>>16039950

File: 1463940173012.jpg (269KB, 1052x590px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1052x590px

>>16036825
>Performance wise, C4 corvettes drank the fuck out of its milkshake. You don't have to wait for a C4, you just have to find a C4 with the harsh suspension.

Can someone translate this?

E39 m5

File: supra.jpg (77KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 640x480px

All of you Corolla fags have gotta learn what a real Toyota looks like. Supra and Trueno were the definitive ones.

File: HEICO_SPORTIV_Volvo_240_Turbo_3.jpg (390KB, 930x620px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 930x620px

You disappoint me.

File: sbyder20080612082022pslfile4.jpg (51KB, 800x531px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 800x531px

>>16040721
>Trueno
Yeah... a corolla