Which would you choose? 2005 Audi TT or 2005 Porsche Boxster?

Boxster, as it's an actual purpose-built sports car and not a Golf with all practicality removed and the roof chopped off.

I like the look of the TT more

File: lel.jpg (39KB, 232x196px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 232x196px

>>16019262
Nah, bro.
Nah.

>>16018771
that's not a 2005 boxster though, it still had runny egg headlights.

either way I'd choose 986 over TT, but 987 boxster over both

the one that isn't fwd/fwd biased awd.

>>16019274
>that's not a 2005 boxster though, it still had runny egg headlights.

No, MY2004 was the last year of the 986 and MY2005 was the first year of the 987.

>>16018771
Porch

Isn't TT all around better? HP/Torque, handling, and not to mention much cheaper?

>>16022069
Cheaper, sure. Power/torque, only better than the base 2.5l first gen Boxster. Handling, not even close.

File: GreenTT.png (934KB, 820x615px) Image search: [Google]

934KB, 820x615px

I learned to drive in a 6-speed TT 225 Roadster (same color combo as pic), and I think the Boxster is an abomination.

But lets compare:

--- TT 1.8L '225' Roadster---
> Peak hp: 225
> Peak tq: 206
> Redline: 6,600 rpm
> Drivetrain: 97.5% front, 2.5% rear until slippage then it can give up to 100% to the rear.
> Trans: 6MT
> Suspension: Multi-link
> Curb weight: 3,384 lbs
> 0-60 mph: 6.9 sec
> Stop to 1320 ft: 15.2 sec @ 93 mph
> Top speed: 130 mph limited, 149 mph with limiter removed

--- Boxster ---
> Peak hp: 240
> Peak tq: 200
> Redline: 7,200 rpm
> Drivetrain: RWD
> Trans: 5MT
> Suspension: MacPherson
> Curb weight: 2,855 lbs
> 0-60 mph: 6.2 sec
> Stop to 1320 ft: 14.5 sec @ 98 mph
> Top speed: 159 mph

__...--- VERDICT ---...__

The Boxster is a better performing car in most ways by a significant margin.

>>16022458
Please note: I am a dumbass, I forgot about the VR6 TT. One sec... I'll make a list for that too...

-_-

File: f290909184.jpg (71KB, 401x504px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 401x504px

>>16022470
Actually, no, I won't.

The 3.2L TT only came with an automatic "DSG" transmission in the US; hence not a real car.

Boxster wins!

>>16018771
Boxter, though ideally you'd want a Cayman.

Be better off comparing an MR2 and a Boxster. The TT is garbage.

Both have equally good customer ratings.


>>16022943
The MR2 isn't even in the same league...

>>16022458

To add to your list:

--- TT 1.8L '225' Roadster---

>looks really effeminate
>women will assume you are homosexual
>no pussy

--- Boxster ---

>looks like a Porsche
>women can read the word "Porsche" on it
>yes pussy

porsche but the newer audi tt Quatro over both

File: TT.jpg (269KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 900x600px

>>16023818
Honestly, I think the Boxster looks more effeminate.

>>16024059

You kind of loose your privilege to comment on anything masculine with a name like that. If you actually drive a Panda it's even worse.

File: panda5.jpg (4KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 100x100px

>>16024080
You must be new here.

Also, why care about what 'gender' random people associate your car's appearance with? That's some seriously insecure shit.

>>16024108

lgbtbbq+=+====---**** ------>>

>>16024133
>Implying everything is about sex or impressing people.
>Implying car enthusiasts just don't want a car that drives really well.

>>>/soc/

I'm already engaged so idgaf about other women. She also thinks the Audi TT looks better