GODORITO PATENTS

>>16002930
>be disappointed if this doesn't end up being an a2w one
why? are you retarded or something?

File: 2016patents1.gif (34KB, 1323x1433px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 1323x1433px

Not pictured:
Oil cooler is water cooled.
The turbocharger has a condenser. ??? Maybe that's supposed to say compressor.

11a - exhaust port
20B - flow control valve
30 - distribution regulating valve

>>16002966
No, are you sure that's not just you?

File: 2016patents0.gif (38KB, 1323x1921px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1323x1921px

12 Water jacket
12a The 1st course
12b The 2nd course
20A - water pump

The water jacket is divided up in a top and bottom side. With the exhaust up top, it's going to be hotter there.

Bottom is a comparison to previous lay out. New engine is smaller despite being 1.6l, you all knew that already though.

>>16002966

W2A intercoolers are much more efficient than A2A.

Problem is you've got an unlimited supply of air of a static temperature, and you hit a wall with thermal capacity of water unless you chill it somehow

>>16002930
are they just looking for thumbs upvotes or do they think any of this is innovative

>>16003009
You chill it with a radiator, one which only needs to be about 1/4th as large as a normal intercooler since it has liquid flowing through it that absorbs the cooler radiator better than air does.

An AMG GTR and ATS-V survive the track perfectly fine, and the ATS-V has its intercooler sitting on top of the hot engine. a2w is better in every way except that the weight of the liquid can offset the savings from smaller radiators.

>>16003077
>a2w is better in every way except that the weight of the liquid can offset the savings from smaller radiators.
you're not even close to being right.

>>16003095
K nice argument, retard. You should go see if AMG is hiring a retarded engineer to unfix their cars.

>>16003123
>because an oem does it it's better in every single way

>>16003202
>oem just love adding more complication, higher production costs, and increasing R&D costs to develop new systems because they make more money by wasting money like that.

I hope you're trolling and not actually this retarded.

>>16003224
Have you seen a modern car? They don't give a fuck about complication because at such high volumes it actually costs very little.
And a car with a/w chargecoolers is easier to assemble and install on a line than one with an intercooler. Wouldn't surprise me if the decreased labour costs outweigh the additional parts cost.
I mean, if you've got data to show otherwise I'd like to see it.
A/W is better for packaging and throttle response and some low speed driving.
It's certainly not more efficient as a car picks up speed.

>>16003224
>>oem just love adding more complication, higher production costs, and increasing R&D costs to develop new systems because they make more money by wasting money like that.
It's funny because it's true

>>16002971
>condenser
Sure that's not lingo for an intercooler?

>>16003276
I am not sure. Most of it is in moon runes. It's in a flow chart pointing T/C condenser -> EGR. Japanese patent office 2016 - 108973 and 2016 - 118115