VEESIXSTANG

theres always shame when you couldve had a v8

>>16002143
nah good handling,Smooth torquey v6 , not quite the soound not and power of the v8 but you will still be passing the japs and krauts

File: 1475715024018.png (480KB, 568x506px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 568x506px

>>16002143
Of course

But I would rather have a v6 manual than an automatic v8

Can you slap a turbo or super on them and compensate for the lack of two cylinders without blowing up the engine?

>>16002143

Yes. Even most women make their husbands buy them the V8.

It's like getting a diet drink with a 5000 calorie fast food meal.

File: image.jpg (833KB, 1911x1289px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 1911x1289px

>>16002143
You're going to catch shit from the GT-bros, but it's not a bad car to DD. I had a 2010 V6 as my DD for over a year (pic related). Very reliable and very smooth ride. I traded it for a C5 Corvette, but that's beside the point.

I mean if it's a dirt cheap DD that you're gonna beat to death, who cares?

File: Screenshot_2016-09-25-19-08-19-1.png (736KB, 720x707px) Image search: [Google]

736KB, 720x707px

>>16002143
Just buy a Twincharger system for it mate. You'll fuckin eat everything bigger thtsn you like an old Delta S4 would

>>16002143
I'm buying a 2017 V6. There are generally 3 types of people who hate on v6 Stangs.

1. Retards who don't know that they got a new engine in 2011.

2. Shitbox drivers who can't afford a mustang (jealousy).

3. Bus riders (jealousy).

A guy who drives a GT and talks shit about the V6 just has s superiority complex. and you'll get that with any car.

>>16002155
Is than an RX8 with it's retard knuckle duster hand brake?

>>16002165
If you're doing that, you might as well get the Ecoboost or GT. No sense in buying the V6, then spending money to make it faster and less reliable.

>>16002337
Lol no tork v6 why even bother with the sports coupe design when you can get 4cyclinder sedans with more

>>16002148
lmao maybe civics or base model 3 series

File: 1476315791051.jpg (70KB, 540x366px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 540x366px

>>16002337
I can afford a v6 mustang, yet would never buy one.

You can't even buy a v6 mustang with the performance package right?

>>16002382
Once again, if you're buying the performance package on the V6, you might as well just buy the Ecoboost.

File: image.gif (4MB, 452x308px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 452x308px

>>16002367
>tork

>>16002372
I mean, that's kind of the point of the Mustang, isn't it? Cheap sportiness.

>>16002420
>spending 25k to beat a fucking civic

You're beyond saving

File: 1472717565628.png (152KB, 316x317px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 316x317px

>>16002411
>Dork

>>16002143
Its a car, isn't it? Beats the shit out of walking or taking the city's welfare limo

>>16002207
This br/o/ gets it

File: 1430290104165.jpg (16KB, 283x283px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 283x283px

>>16002143

>mustang
>suppose to be a performance vehicle
>stuffed with safety and luxury options so it no longer resembles one except for the V8
>take the V8 out

>>16002528
>performance vehicle
>can't have safety and luxury
Your 91 Honda hatch isn't a performance vehicle.

Yes, because the pre-11s are dogshit all around and you still have a better option in an 05-10 v8 if you bought an 11 or newer v6.

>>16002442
>everything has to be what I like and perform to my standards or else it's shit!

you sound like a real faggot, anon

>>16002207
>spend money on F/I
>could have spent the same or less money on a v8 mustang compared to v6 + F/I
This logic doesn't check out.

>>16002337
Why not buy a 2005-2010 GT? You'll be faster and get to enjoy the V8 exhaust note.

Any v6 from 2011 and on will be good. I had a 2012 and traded it in for a ms3. I still miss it. Believe it or not, it was one of the best cars I've ever owned

>>16002566
>faster
Not by much. It's close enough to be a driver's race. Plus you get way better mpgs with a 2011+ v6

>>16002591
But for the same money you could get a 2005-2010 GT and have money left over for sick mawdz. There is no reason for an enthusiast to buy the rental-car-spec mustang. If you must have a v6 sports car get a 350z or 370z.

>>16002598
The savings alone from a pre-11 gt will cover fuel economy differences.

>>16002598
>>16002605

>mpg's
>mustang

Faggots like you shouldn't be buying Mustangs. Buy a fucking Fiesta if you're worried about fuel economy.

>>16002382
I know you could in like 2011 or 2012 when ever they switched to the "new" v6 that is as fast as my old v8 with slightly better mpg.
If i wasn't so concerned about resale value I would get a 2012 or 13 in grabber blue.

>>16002627
Or maybe some people like to have both power and fuel economy??

>>16002641
2015 and up v6 has no performance pack available because the Ecoboost model gets it now.

>>16002627
As someone that daily drives a v8 mustang, the mpg's is important. but the v6 he's talking about is one of those rare 300hp with 30+mpg cars.
If I didn't already have my v8 and I were buying a car today to keep, I would buy the v6. Since I already sunk the cost into my v8 I can take the MPG hit.

>>16002649
You are screwing yourself out of the v8 exhaust note and putting yourself in constant ridicule AND most likely spending more money. It's not like a GT gets terrible mpg if you drive it sensibly anyways.

>>16002664
>putting yourself in constant ridicule
From who? Unless he works at a ford dealership I doubt anyone cares.

>>16002671
Anybody who knows anything about cars might not say it to his face, but buying a v6 mustang is buying a rental car.

>>16002676
What are you talking about, I think that v6 mustangs is one of the best daily drivers available if you want a blend of power and mpg.

>>16002566
That's not the case. The old V8s and new V6 cars are about the same performance wise. Not to mention the overhaul the 6th gen recieved in 2015. I'd also rather own a new car than an 7 year old GT.

>>16002681
But why buy a mustang as a daily? If you want a sensible car with decent pep and fuel economy get a v6 accord or something and something stupid for fun. Getting a bad compromise doesn't seem ideal.

>>16002696
The mustang has more pep and fuel economy than the v6 accord.

>>16002691
The old v8s slightly edge out the new V6s even if their peak hp is the same.

>>16002698
And is 5 grand cheaper lol

Would you get a daily driver V6 in auto or manual?

What exactly is the difference in terms of driving dynamics?

>>16002699
I'd trade a minuscule amount from my 0-60 time to get a car that handles much better.

No

But there is a shame in owning I4 Mustang

File: 14339285_1736785933230198_92440262_o2.jpg (653KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

653KB, 2048x1536px

I'm considering getting a V6 Mustang to take my autism out on like my Mercury Sable.

>>16002708
i4 as in a fox, sure. I'm kinda interested in the eco boost.

>>16002703
I daily drove a 2011 v6 manual for a couple of years. Mostly highway commute. I loved it.I looked forward to driving it when I could. I couldn't believe how smooth it rode and you'd even get some 2nd gear gurgle and pop from the stock exhaust just cruising around town.

>>16002143
You're a douche if you rice out a V6 'stang or act like it's hot shit.

Otherwise, it's fine. They're actually a pretty good value too, if you compare them to other vehicles with a V6.

>>16002337
>people who don't validate my retarded purchasing decisions are [list of buzzwords]
epic

>>16002740
Who attack my reasonable purchasing decision.
If you need a car, I don't see why the v6 is a bad car.

I'd recommend buying a lightly used 2015 or 2016 to save a couple grand.

>>16002744
Hi >setk, hows the whale?

I just never get why the v6 Mustang gets so much hate.since 2011 it's become a formidable vehicle.

For 24k you get a hell of a lot of car. 305hp and 30mpgs highway.

Some people can't afford the v8 or don't want to deal with the gas milage and higher insurance. This is a good option for those people.

For the price, the Mustang is one of the best bangs for the buck.

File: 1476350434512.jpg (31KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x600px

>>16002354
i ilke the retard knuckle duster hand breake

If V8 was an option and you choose a lesser engine, you're a faggot. Then you're also a faggot for driving a mustang in the first place, so the faggotry compounds. Normal people don't like you because you drive a mustang, mustang owners don't like you because you drive a V6, and you can't even like yourself because your engine is weak, your car sounds like shit, and constantly in the back of your mind is "I could have had a V8"

>>16003188
It's a meme. That should explain everything.

>>16003196
I do too. It's just goofy.

>>16003209
>has never owned a car

>>16002566
Because that's old. Out of warranty. Just as fast as a 2011+ v6 but with lower MPG.

Some people like to buy cars that won't go to shit after 5 years.

>>16003209
I cant believe you took the time to type that out. And I cant believe I took the time to reply to you.

>>16002372
>I'm a complete fucking retard: the post

The V6 Mustang manual is quicker to 60mph than a comparable year Si.

>>16003188
Because there's no reason to buy it over a v8 mustang for the same price.
>>16003250
Are you a woman? How do you let a car that's about 10 years old or newer go to shit in 5 years?

>>16002143
I'm not gonna discuss whether the v6 is any good or not. that's not what OP asked. He asked if there was shame in it.

Yes there is. Most people know how to tell the difference between a GT and a V6 and they will respect you less for getting the V6. Most people won't think it's cool and they won't care about the better handling or how it almost makes as much HP as a 2010 GT. They'll just know that it's the "chick mustang".

Get it if you want OP but nobody is gonna admire it.

File: image.jpg (210KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 800x600px

how do you fucking retards not realize that just because
>HURRR THE VEE6 IS LE FASTER THAN PREVIOUS VEEEEEIGHTS
doesn't make it better?

a mustang is a MUSCLE CAR, and quite literally by definition, a muscle car has to have:
>a v8
>rwd

that's all it fucking needs.
sure, your v6 fagmobile is faster than previous v8s, but you have negative torque figures and drive a castrated version of a real muscle car

just recently test drove the S550 v8 & v6, and the difference is massive. the v8 gives you that kick in the pants when you put your foot to the floor, while the v6 makes a shitty sound and acceleration doesn't feel special or "muscle-car-y" at all.

Well, that's like a diesel Porsche. Looks good, but sounds shitty. Still better than an EcoBoost Mustang, though.

>>16002143
That gen with the 4.0? They are really slow. It won't be a sports car, just a little 2-door DD. If you want to have fun, you will regret it everyday.

>>16004155
this
even the 4.0L v6 mustangs everyone shits on will be pretty even with a stock v8 fox

I'd still take the fox anyday though

>>16002148
Sorry m8 not true. My E36 M3 pulls on my friends 2015 3.7 6spd. Destroys any 4.0 V6 stang, and 2v GTs can't shake me if I haven't already pulled on them.

When it comes to the civic si, not sure I know an 8th gen will beat a 4.0 V6, not sure about a 3.7

>>16004155
mustang is a pony car designed for secretaries