is this even remotely safe?
>>15921123
I don't see why not
My post is an artform as much as that car. Safety is an artform so I see why not?
It depends. Individual safety is meaningless where the result is injury, not death. A corpse on the highway costs the government money and man hours, a breathing body that gets checked into a hospital accrues its own debts. Safety to others, however, is paramount.
So, reinforced oil pan?
>>15921123
Not unless you got Liberty Walk on your side. Plastic fenders are deemed unsafe, by road standards FRP is the most safest for pedestrian and driver safety.
>>15921331
Also Volvo can suck my dick. Overfenders are the safest, even Quebec and California approves of this.
>>15921331
keeping pedestrians completely out of the paths of automobiles is the safest, just not practical in a world without slave labor
>walkable tunnels, not painted lines
>$$$$$$$$$$$$
>>15921336
California only regulates emissions. As long as you meet any applicable emissions requirements, all you need is lights and fenders and you're good to go. It's one of the most permissive states in the country.
>>15921625
>California
>one of the most permissible states when it comes to cars
Pick one
its perfectly safe
>>15922236
funny that they have literally the best car scene in the US eh
>>15921331
>rising sun
>mini
>>15921336
apply directly to intake
>>15922289
>built by a Japanese company
>>15922294
you got me senpai, never heard of them.
bro its safe dont hate on my life style
>>15921123
it cant go very fast, i don't see why not
>>15921331
>imagine all the people n shiet...
I want to torch this piece of crap so much
>>15921123
That cars on bags, famalam