Say hello to your new shitbox overlord. HONDA A BEST

looks like a 400lbs macdonalds lard ass couch potato stuffed into lycra sports clothes

File: Honda Civic Type R Sedan2.jpg (341KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 1366x768px

too good

Pigfat

File: 2018-Honda-Civic-Type-R-3.jpg (124KB, 1600x1062px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1600x1062px

sauce

http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2016/09/2018-honda-civic-type-r-prototype-offers-first-look-at-us-bound-model.html

>HURR IMMA SO AGGRESSIVE
>SOOO AGGRESSIIVEEEEEEE
>ILL GET YOU TO HIGHSCHOOL AND YOUR GROCERIES SO MUCH FASTER AND AGRESSIVVVEE HURRRR

File: 2018-Honda-Civic-Type-R-5.jpg (111KB, 1600x1062px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1600x1062px

TYPE RRRRRRRRRRRR

File: 1470466718849.gif (4MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 200x200px

>shitbox overlord
isn't this thing supposed to be 60 grand

>>15910078
Isnt the type R actually decent though?

Why tf are these companies copying each other? Nissan did the red line for their bottom trim and now honda?

>>15910076
OH DEAR GOD!! how do you not turn people to stone with an ass that ugly!

>>15910081
Kinda looks like Honda's attempt at a Evo/STI style car. i doubt they will be if they added AWD trim with even more power that'd be killer.
>>15910083
>60 grand

i actually liked it but nah fuck it if that's true. it would be a collectors item for die-hard honda fans at this point.

>>15910081
If I had to guess without knowing, I'd say it's a new Impreza.

>>15910055
where the two door at ?
either way I look forward to its engine being swapped in to other cars

File: 1473916535318.jpg (62KB, 522x563px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 522x563px

>>15910084
>I just want to know what's at the bottom of a vagina
Do you want me to show you?

>>15910083
>>15910123

low to mid-30k, I'm betting.

It looks like they morphed together every rice burner made in the last decade.

>>15910164
It will be $30-40k
The current gen CTR is the same price as a Focus RS in Europe.

>>15910055
Looks okayish from the front

>>15910076
>>15910081
But fucking repulsive at any other angle. What an overdesigned and bloated looking turd.

>>15910055
FUCK YEAH

Does this piece of shit still use macpherson's on the front?

I wish that made it 3 door instead of 5 door.

>>15910123
Won't get AWD because Honda want it to break all the FWD lap records and flip the bird to Renault and VW.

>>15910055
looks far far better than the ugly as fuck last gen.

Looks better than mazgay 3 mum car

>>15910081
>front
nice
>rear
shit

the rear is absolutely atrocious, but it would still be way better without that horrible wing on it.

>>15910081
Needs a 3-door version.

>>15910588
the rear kinda grows on me, like every iteration of civic

>>15910055
>Costs as much as a fucking Camaro SS, maybe even a 1LE
>Costs more than a Mustang GT
Yeah no thanks. What's the point of a overstyled grocery getter when you could just buy an actual performance car?

File: chrysalis cringe.gif (3MB, 375x426px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 375x426px

>>15910055
>brand new Honda
>shitbox

wut

File: btfo.png (257KB, 549x554px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 549x554px

>>15910656
>costs as much
>but still faster
lmao

>>15910723
>Cherry picking

Jesus is this decade the worst for car design yet or what?

>>15910081
I like it

>>15911097
No, still 90s. Don't even bring up the rare few exceptions, you and I both know the 90s were absolute shit for aesthetics.

>>15911007
It would be cherry picking if the Civic was faster around only one track and that was the only track they were presenting. However in this case, it's faster around every track. That's not cherry picking, that's just presenting facts.

>>15911144
Late 70's and early to mid 80's were far worse IMO

>>15911144
Any 90s Jap car is beautiful and you can't prove me wrong
90s BMW was also nice

File: 214353.jpg (172KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1024x768px

>>15911007
>cherry picking the example you yourself provided

File: _TB_8766_Honda Civic Type R.jpg (392KB, 1900x1267px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1900x1267px

I've been shitting on the regular hatch pretty bad for being a fat uncohesive mess, but the Type-R looks damn good.

They still need to get rid of the rear fake vents, though.

>>15910055
>praising the literal US cuck version of the type R

It's going to be detuned version with less power
hate it already

>>15911243
The current model detunes itself.

>>15911230
The real question is

How much does it weigh now?

>>15911144
90s were fucking god tier
>boring cars knew they were boring
>good cars were simple and subtle but attractive

>>15911297
the current model is rated at 228 kW (310 PS; 306 bhp) at 6500 RPM and maximum torque of 400 N·m (300 lb·ft) at 2500-4500 RPM

What is this one rated at?

>>15911144
But at least you could identify cars 100 meters in front of you. Today they fucking all look like they came out of the same korean factory.

>>15911230
mohterfucking fake air vents

disgusting

File: 1417661451069.jpg (16KB, 403x312px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 403x312px

>premium track focused sports car
>fake vents on the front
>fake vents on the back
10/10 loving this trend

>>15911230
only a child will love this rice.

>>15910120
Maccabenz did too for CLA.

It's so cheap and cheesey and tacky looking wtf dey thankin'...

>>15911895
>can't distinguish between modern cars

I think you just have car autism anon.

File: Screenshot_20160929-162046~2.png (280KB, 618x559px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 618x559px

why

>>15912664
toot

File: j7xpCfe.png (8KB, 775x347px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 775x347px

Fuck you nerds, I love the Type R. I was thinking about getting a Civic hatch when it came out, but if the Type R isn't too much above $30k I'll hold out and save for that.

It looks like a brand new ricemobile with practicality and speed and that appeals to every part of me.

>>15910723
lol @ rice specing a civic to track settings just to compete with a fat nigmobile made for grocery getting

honda fags will defend this

>>15912775
If there's no 3 door hatch

it will never be a true civic type R

>>15912775
>but if the Type R isn't too much above $30k

m8 the Focus RS starts at 36k and the Golf R starts at 40k. And the RS regularly goes over MSRP price due to high demand and low stock.

This looks more premium than either, and the Type R is in higher demand by far. The price is going to be even worse.

File: Sub.jpg (75KB, 800x459px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 800x459px

>>15911230

This shit is gonna hit high 30s easy.

Who in their right mind would pay that much for an ecobox with a turbo?

Why not an STI? Or 370z? Proper sports cars build for speed, not upgraded with a turbo from a poor man's 15k ecobox?

File: 2015-Subaru-Impreza-Coupe-Hatchback-2.0i-4dr-All-wheel-Drive-Hatchback-Photo-3.jpg (191KB, 2100x1386px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 2100x1386px

>>15913119
>STI
>not a souped up econobox

I mean I like the STI, but really.

Same goes for the Evo/GTI/Golf R/Focus ST/RS, and I'd take any of them over 90% of sport cars that weren't based on econoboxes.

>>15912796
A Civic Type R is whatever Honda decides is a Civic Type R.

>>15913119
>STI
>upgraded with a turbo from a poor man's 18k ecobox

>>15913327
>Amerifat Honda engineers triggered

I-it's a Type R, we built and it's fast! It deserves to use the Type R nameplate!

no

>>15910055
Looks like a Camaro impregnated a Civic with downs and this is their kid. Literally the car of boy racers

>wing
>FWD
fucking kek

I was debating this or a 2009 911 carrera as my new DD.

>what do /o/

>>15913384
Carrera why is this economeme even an option?

>>15913397
They are within 10k of one another assuming the type R sales for 38k

>>15913397
>tfw more interested in an economeme than a carrera

>>15913397
>>15913444
I dont think being a DD is Porsche's strong point. Sure they CAN do it, but its also going to be 10k in maintenance every year.

>>15912664
Wastegate gets its own tailpipe :^)

>>15914073
Does it have it's own tiny cat like F40s?

>>15910055
fuck i thought that was an accord

do you think vtec will kick in through the stereo

File: monty-python-spanish-inquisition.png (163KB, 500x313px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 500x313px

>>15912664
V TEC PIPE CONFIRMED

>>15914106
It is. Its a scaled down accord gen8 coupe with a couple of simple"mods"

I like it, but why no proper 3-door hatchback like the EK9?

File: it's friday.png (140KB, 245x266px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 245x266px

>>15910076

File: whatintheflyingfuck.png.jpg (406KB, 900x2452px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 900x2452px

>>15910055
even the red pinstripe is annoying

>>15910062

First post best post.
Underrated.

File: White-Bunny.jpg (41KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x500px

>>15910055

If it's low 30's I think I might consider getting one.

I've never owned a fwd car before and would like to see if it's as bad as as "car enthusiasts" make it out to be.

>>15914607
Get an integra instead then. Because at least we know what its capabilities are.

>>15910055
As someone who has owned a DC2 Integra Type-R, this Civic looks like absolute ass. Where's the gif where it turns out to be a transformer?

It's like they sat around in the board room and someone who makes the final decision demanded the designers add more lines to it; more lines!

File: 2018-Honda-Civic-Type-R-5.png (1023KB, 1600x1062px) Image search: [Google]

1023KB, 1600x1062px

>>15914652
>demanded the designers add more lines to it; more lines!
seriously
I mean what the fuck is going on here

>>15910055
Too many doors.

>>15914697
Is that a WRX?

>>15914697

It 's like they hired 50 buddhist feng shui monks to design each corner of the car in complete isolation from each other in the end to have all the parts put together by a single polack.

Is the 2017 Honda Fit a good econobox

>>15914765

most likely it looks so ugly because it's functional aero... they are going for the special olympics title of fastest fwd car after all.

>>15914808
the wing alone adds 20hp give or take

>>15914794
Yep
Get the manual

>>15914808
>functional aero
Horseshit.

>>15913384
the 911 is an awesome car but you don't want one as your daily driver

>>15910055
>NSX
>Civic Type-R
>Honda's launching a new S2000 line
It's like fucking Christmas.

File: 1468717168127.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>>15915107
>Honda's launching a new S2000 line
but they're not
don't give me that "RUMOR: honda working on next gen s2k" horseshit thats been recycled every year since production stopped

>>15915136
Wait, fuck. That's actually just a rumor? Shit, I had some hopes for that.

File: 1469565452380.png (482KB, 816x1270px) Image search: [Google]

482KB, 816x1270px

>>15910723
>camaro

>>15915107
>NSX
unnecessarily over-complicated mess that shits all over the spirit of the original
>Civic Type-R
a WRX clone with all the bad features and none of the good
>new S2000
not happening, as always
>It's like fucking Christmas
worst Christmas ever

>>15914808
>functional aero
>pointless wing

No

>>15910460
>⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
wat

>>15915178
>this will be ignored

>>15910055
Buying a FWD eclipse sounds bad. What makes this any different?

>>15916746
It's a Honda not a piece of shit made by a shit company

>>15915136
Where can I find the video of moral man doing this?

>>15910055
front looks outstanding perfection, modern days mona lisa
side profile looks below mediocre
rear looks awful, just get rid of those rice air vents

>>15913173
You can do a lot more with STIs then Civic Type Rs thanks to AWD. STIs can be driven in the snow, can actually launch, can drive off road, better styling, etc.

Maybe not an STI but the 370z is the proper sports car yall been wanting from Japan. For domestic, go with a Mustang or something idk.

They are ecoboxs now but have always been designed with top end in mind. Civic Type R is a boyracer that will have the price tag of a luxury car only adults can buy. It's gonna sell worse than the Evo X. Honda needs to lay off the drugs and leave the Type S/R trim to Acura like Toyota to Lexus.

>>15917155
Do you even read the shit you type?