High Learning Curve

>>15883781
>discusses manual
>posts automatic
>automatic camaro
triggered

>>15883814
But it has manual mode on the bottom see

>>15883781
I think you're just a shit driver m8
>over 12k miles and still can't rev match from feeling or launch without lurching
shig

>>15883841
I can launch without lurching but I have to slip it for a second or two. Feels unnatural and weird slipping it that much.

>>15883910
Camaro should have more than enough torkz to not need to do that, unless cuck v6

is >>15883838 you?

>>15883781
>12k on the odo and still cant get a feel for the car
>memorizing anything

You dont memorize shit... you just fucking do it. You suck at driving. Face it.

>>15883940
Wait with the v8 you don't need to slip as much? How does the v8 differ with shifting. And yah that was a joke post.

>>15883942
>You suck at driving. Face it.
Dam I guess I do suck at driving. I'm good at driving autos should I trade mine in for an auto?

Have you ever driven a manual with a short throw clutch? It's a lot different that a standard truck. Admit it, it does have a high learning curve though.

>>15883987
>short throw clutch
kek, you gave it up there.
Just incase you really are that dumb though, no, it does not have a high learning curve at all.

You are a shit driver with manual, and auto.

Sensible bump

I mean really no one else has a high learning curve car???

>>15885092
Nothing is high curve learning WTF are you even talking about?
Some cars are equipped with a stiffer or softer clutch
Causing higher or lower bite points.
That's the difference.

I drive a 2015 Honda civic manual. The clutch is soft and easy to drive.
I drive stis and wrxs some have performance clutches on them and I can still drive them perfectly fine because I don't suck at driving manual.
You are putting way too much thought into the process of driving manual dude

>>15885774
>Nothing is high curve learning
Eh, I wouldn't say 'nothing', but yeah 90% of cars are retard proof.

OP is a retard

>>15883814
it's a sequential disguised as an automatic

>>15885882
It's not.

It's a fucking Camaro not a GT-R

>driving bros '95 suzuki sidekick 1.6l 16V 4x4 5 spd
>only driven it a few times (maybe 10 hours)
>already got down heel-toe down-shifts while braking without letting off the brakes and rev matching

in a 3rd world 4x4 made for driving in the woods. with a clutch that lets out all the way at the top and an engine that doesn't even make power till 4000 rpm

>12000 miles and not perfected

>>15885901
>drive automatic LS1 trans am
>walk away from every manual i race including the same car with a 6 spd


but manuals are fun desu

>>15885909
>automatics are faster than a manual in a straight line
who woulda thunk it

>>15885919
my other car is also automatic. its an EF civic with 62hp and an H4 auto trans

auto trans is chill af

>>15883781
Why are there gauges all the way at the bottom of the center console. How the fuck is the driver going to see that

>>15885950
It is, but I think you need to balance it out and have a (few) manual car(s)

>>15885995
i drive my brothers manual 4x4
>>15885905

if i can find a cable trans for my civic i'll swap it in

i could do a hydro swap but the auto doesn't make a difference when you have 62 hp

it shifts early and my engine makes peak torque early. its gets 45mpg through a 4 speed auto

>>15885909
>drive a Trans Am
>always get compliments on my sleeveless Molly Hatchet shirt