Just saw these test mules when I went to grab some food

I know they are just test mules but fuck they are ugly IMO.

grey one looks like what a super car would look like if someone from Mad Max designed it.

Looks great desu

OP is full of shit.
He trolled before with pics of just the middle one.
These are kit cars.
Look at the middle one.
>cheap ass tail lights on a strip of aluminum pop riveted to the body.
>body itself is pop riveted together.
>two of them have tow hitches.
>the one on the right is missing the spoiler and there's double sided tape left where it was mounted.

>>15870621

here we go.

File: what.png (72KB, 495x398px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 495x398px

>>15870582
>>15870592
>Ford paint

Jesus that's worse than Mitsubishi and Chrysler.

>>15870615
>kit cars
>massive carbon ceramic brakes

>>15870615
>kit cars
How many kit cars do you see these days that aren't one of the following:
- AC Cobra
- GT 40
- Lotus 7
- Arial Atom
- Generic roadster

Sure they're using some OTS car builder parts, but seeing as they seem to have carbon fibre body panels and various bits of instrumentation slapped all over I'd say thems were mules.

>>15870615
Are you autistic or is this really poor bait?

>>15870658
The carbon fiber is vinyl sticker.
>>15870657
Like you can't buy a set from baer.

The body panels on the dark colored one don't even line up.
OP won't post those pics anymore because it looks so shitty (it was the prototype, which is why its complete).

These are just some kit cars being made by a hole in the wall shop.

Post some interior pics of all 3 OP.

File: FalkenGTR4_uWHU_0.jpg (86KB, 672x448px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 672x448px

>>15870658
nobody would make such a high quality kit car of a brand new supercar

RCR/Superlite makes some high performance kit cars like the SLC and a recently released '05 GTR replica

>>15870615
They are so good at building kit cars in their garage that they got manufacturer plates

>different mirrors.
>different windshield wiper systems
>different taillights.
>missing side markers, spoilers

They're fucking kit cars.
If you think they're legit, you're an idiot.

>>15870697
Look closely at the panels in primer - you can see the twill pattern!

Mules are called mules for a reason...
The panels don't line up and the build quality looks shitty because they're constantly being disassembled, reassembled, and generally abused.

>>15870719
I can get manufacturer plates.
Bfd.
>>15870701
I worked on a RR phantom kit car made from the new 2003 body style.
I worked on it IN 2003.
Company had it to do a stretch limo conversion and they made a mold of it.
Shady shit in the automotive world.

>>15870724
They're MULES you fucking inbred bus rider

>>15870724
l2 google fucknugget
http://jalopnik.com/ford-gt-test-drivers-caught-going-101-mph-in-a-50-mph-z-1786907323

>>15870559
You really should have watermarked these with pictures of mohammad, to stop jalopnik and similar pieces of shit from stealing them.

>>15870635
heres your reply

>>15870592
>prototype / sample
>for evaluation only
>PGW LOGO
>not certified for resale
>or ????? use

http://www.repairerdrivennews.com/2016/03/02/lkq-straddles-oem-aftermarket-glass-world-with-635m-purchase-of-pgw/

>PGW was the Tier 1 supplier for the new Ford GT supercar, which features Ford-Corning Gorilla Glass windshields, according to glassBYTES and PGW.

>>15870724
look at the brakes and plates

>>15870813
>or ????? use
It says highway. That glass isn't NHTSA certified and they're driving around anyway. The absolute madmen.

>>15870559
That's typical kit car glass and carbon fiber, not a mule.

File: 2017-ford-gt-test-mule-spied-looks-apocalyptic-sans-paint-photo-gallery_3.jpg (463KB, 1626x1080px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 1626x1080px

>>15870907
kill yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6FtmnuQa2E

>>15870572
Is that a Roush?

>>15870787
This. I hate to say it, but I'm sure these will be posted on some shitty site by tomorrow.

>>15870907
if it's so typical surely you can come up with a picture of another car with that shape glass

or did this kit car manufacturer have their own glass cut?

>>15870559
Probably broken down.
Typical Ford. should of bought a Corvette.

>>15870916
typical kit car video
the engines are probably detuned LS engines, you can hear it.

>>15870701
Fun Fact

RCR were the ones who made all the kit cars for the Need for Speed movie. They didnt make the molds for the body, they got another company to do it but they looks almost like the originals.

>>15870959
>believing lies
stay bootyblasted.

>>15870907
>tfw Factory five have a Ford GT replica out before the Ford GT is released

Ive always wondered about this.

How do kit car companies like Superlite and Factory Five sell replica's of cars made by other automotive manufacturers and not have the law against them.

Isnt there a thing called intellectual property?

Or is calling it a different name regardless it looks the same all you gotta do to get around the law?

>>15871215
You can buy property

>>15871215
I don't think the Cobra design is protected by copyright. It's been copied for at least 30 years now. Same for the Ford GT40

File: IMG_6457.jpg (82KB, 986x603px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 986x603px

>>15870697
Retarded

File: totally not a Stratos.jpg (819KB, 2000x1330px) Image search: [Google]

819KB, 2000x1330px

>>15870615
>>15870697
>>15870724
>>15870907
>>15870945
>kit cars

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/09/21/ford-gt-prototypes-speeding-colorado/

>>15871215
>Isnt there a thing called intellectual property?

Design patents only last 15 years in the US, assuming the manufacturer filed for one. Names can be trademarked, and usually are, so many kit car manufacturers give their lookalikes different names. Copyright won't be involved because it protects the expression, not the idea/design. So you could copyright the drawings and diagrams used to make the car, but not the car itself.

>>15870697
top kek good troll pham

>>15870572
Is that a Roush?

>>15870559
I like it better without the spoiler

>tfw rough-looking prototypes/test mules are my fetish

>>15871273
Ehhhhhh, I'm pretty sure they are. There must be some kind of kickback to Ford or Shelby. Maybe not per unit, but they must have purchased the right to use their intellectual property. Plus, some of them are even doing true continuation cars.

File: Jeep Prangler Test Bed.jpg (57KB, 1024x540px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1024x540px

>>15871749
o rly? does this do it for ya?

File: Commodore-ute-Corvette-3.jpg (85KB, 1140x643px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1140x643px

>>15871749
How about this?

>>15871844
quirky, would drive/10

>>15871867
mid-engine mad max super car swag/10