12th: V12 Vantage S
11th: M4 GTS
10th: GT-R
9th: F-Type SVR
8th: NSX
7th: R8 V10
6th: AMG GT S
5th: Snek ACR
4th: Camaro SS 1LE
3th: 911
2nd: Shelby GT350
1st: McLaren 570S
Thoughts? Memes? Did GM compete?
>only 1 semi-affordable car
Kind of a shitty contest desu
>>15869049
>average joe camaro is in 4th behind supercars and a specialty mustang
pretty sure GM can compete with the upcoming camaros
>AMG anything
>GTR
>McLaren anything
Come on, they're fast but not driver's cars and this is coming from someone who's driven them
>>15869068
SVR and Aston anything are also questionable
The Mustang should have won and the Camaro should have been higher up.
>>15869087
Aston is a 7 speed dogleg manual with close gearing. Literally trading huge amounts of speed for fun.
>>15869068
McLaren 570 has hydraulic steering and sports car handling, to be fair.
>>15869049
>>15869049
>Thoughts?
muh american muscle cars
>Thoughts?
911 in miami blue is sexy as fuck
where's the Fiat Punto
>>15869156
The 1.3 diesel broke down before the photoshoot
>>15869193
>Fiat Diesel
>unreliable
nice meme
>>15869202
they mostly break down in america, where nobody drives them
>>15869100
http://www.roadandtrack.com/motorsports/a30684/racing-a-new-supercar-in-the-sccas-most-grueling-event/
>>15869049
is motor trend sponsored by Porsche or something? the 911 hasn't had a significant change in years yet it is always in the top 3 best drivers cars. seriously, what a fucking boring car.
>>15869049
Not a shabby showing for the Camaro.
The Camaro 1LE is the winner if you take into account cost. And that fact that it is a parts bin car and has no special parts like the Shelby or the supercars.
Truck motor, carryover transmission, zl1 suspension and wheels, regular Camaro platform, decent gas mileage,street tires etc.
The GT350R exhaust is awesome. anyone paying under $100k for one?
>>15869469
>The car I want to win wins when you add this one unrelated metric to the scoring system
>>15869513
Poor baby so mad.
>>15869049
no reason to buy anything but a C6 Z06 if you want bang for the buck out of the box
>>15869513
Lol, you triggered the gm fangirl
>>15869049
>3th
>>15869202
>Fiat
>anything but unreliable
nice delusion. I wouldn't call it a meme because it's not a common opinion at all.
>>15869663
Here comes mjet
>muh opinion from a magazine that takes money from manufacturers meaning anything
Opinions are a sickness of the mind anyway. Paid opinions are scourge of humanity
props to mclaren but damn their cars are butt ugly. would like to drive one to see how they are tho
ugliest car: svr, aston, or the mclaren?
>>15869671
opinions are just that, getting mad over them is pretty autistic
>>15869585
Yep..or even a FRC.
>>15869049
>only 1 semi-affordable car
Top Gear magazine did this too. They took the the 20 best cars of the year, including a bunch of affordable cars then whittled them down through a series of challenges.
The first challenge was a drag race (totally irrelevant in the UK, our roads are laid out to allowed traffic light races) which knocked out all of the affordable cars so they could just take the supercars to the "on the road" test.
>>15869049
I don't like the way they just threw the amg out. Made no sense. If it was so good last year what's wrong with it now?
>>15869049
No spoiler alert? thanks faggot
>>15869049
>12th: V12 Vantage S
190K, sold out.
>11th: M4 GTS
134K, sold out.
>10th: GT-R
111K.
>9th: F-Type SVR
127K
>8th: NSX
157K
>7th: R8 V10
164K
>6th: AMG GT S
112K
>5th: Snek ACR
121K
>4th: Camaro SS 1LE
38K?
>3th: 911
105K
>2nd: Shelby GT350
55K plus 25K dealer markup = 70K.
>1st: McLaren 570S
187K
>Did GM compete?
Yes. Now, where's that 2017 Z/28 with a 7-liter LT7?
>>15869849
They've never picked the same car twice in a row afaik, and the opposition gets better each and every year.
>>15869849
hardly any difference between the previous year
Is the SS 1LE a better drivers car than the regular 1LE?