Toyota Celica ST184R - Aged like wine

>>15837037
Awful car.
Just bland soulless slow junk.

I just see a fwd shitbox

they look like a product of the time no doubt
they aged like milk

bland boring (kinda ugly) to look at milk

>>15837037
>ahead of their time
>incredibly curvy design, round headlights
?????
>2010's
>everything hard edges, sharp lines, sloped headlights

you dont even make any sense, youre fucking jerking off a celica like it was put here by god, its just a Toyota from the 90s

>>15837037
shit taste m8

>>15837051
Old milk becomes cheese though.

File: SW20.jpg (143KB, 968x575px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 968x575px

Only good 90s Toyotas are the MR2 and Corolla
Probably some others that were never out in the USA

>>15837037
Did someone throw that guy from the side with the open door clear through the window on the other side because his car was so gay?

>>15837079
and old milk gives you food poisoning and ends up looking disgusting

much like most 90s Toyotas

>>15837037
>You really need to have your eyes checked m8. You can't make more early 90's design in all its melted shit glory.

Just because you like a cars design, doesn't make it ahead of its time.
I admit it, I like 80's and 90's car design.
I don't think that the good looking cars from then were "ahead of their time". It was just good design. It has no expiration date.

File: 1472600523940.jpg (40KB, 706x768px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 706x768px

>>15837037
Im with you

>>15837150
yeah well youre wrong

File: 1465917633972.jpg (45KB, 580x386px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 580x386px

>>15837153
Subjective matter my friend

File: tmp_23624-190311421770969803.jpg (412KB, 3651x1148px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 3651x1148px

This thread is just butt hurt Americans, mad because the only celicas readily available are fwd shitboxes.

>>15837187
>posts two American gt-fours
okay

>>15837223
>he thinks the ST205 was sold in the US

>>15837187
>americans on an american website don't like the american version of the car they got
Yeah....

>>15837249
>moving the goalposts
you said they aren't readily available and posted evidence showing otherwise, all in the same post.

>>15837037
That generation Celica looks fucking disgusting when compared to the one that came before and the one that came after

>>15837085
>the only good ones are the ones I like. I am authority on the matter. After all, I am a certified benchracer.

File: tmp_23624-DSC03751_zps16c0f0be737314099.jpg (149KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 640x480px

>>15837223
>he thinks GT fours are LHD
>burgers want st205s so bad, they weld on GT four floor pans and convert St204s

File: 1994-1996_Ford_Probe_liftback_02.jpg (3MB, 3564x1464px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3564x1464px

>>15837037
>ford probe body
>ahead of it's time
You have a horrible eye for design

File: 1989 Celica.jpg (160KB, 979x768px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 979x768px

>>15837288
>shits all over a probe

for a 'runaround' car, it was supreme. people are forgetting how mediocre the competition was in that era.

File: tmp_23624-147383032333940306901.jpg (45KB, 599x300px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 599x300px

>>15837258
How does two examples make them readily available.
I can guarantee, the guys that own those went to great lengths to obtain them.

>>15837299
You are so fucking retarded it's unbelievable.
He's talking about the fucking design, which was, is, and will be shitty.
Even the MX-6, which actually has the same engine, looks way, way better than a Probe

>>15837311
anything looks better than a probe, it was Ford trying to compete with the japanese market

>>15837319
That's what I'm saying.
Probe is just junk when it comes to design

>>15837299
>talking about looks
>muhhh reliability
The reading comprehension on /o/ has been astounding for going on 10 years.

>>15837299
Probe was better than any Celica short of a GT-4 tho

definitely better than the shitty Corolla you posted

Yeah they do look very good. I don't see many anymore though.

>>15837319
>>15837323
>looks remarkably like the celica in OP
>OP claims it's ahead of its time in looks
Thanks for confirming.

>>15837335
Weird, I see hardly any similarities in the design besides the flip ups.
Please point out the ones you see.

File: Toyota_CELICA_2.0_GT-FOUR_(ST205)_front.jpg (2MB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1920px

I don't dig the looks at all. I think even bug-eyes looks better (but only the GT-4, FWD one looks like a shapeless blob).

File: tumblr_oam2vyHxy31qm6egko1_1280.jpg (605KB, 1280x1705px) Image search: [Google]

605KB, 1280x1705px

>>15837037
>>15837150
>>15837164
>>15837187
This is one of the saltiest threads I've ever seen. The ST185 looks fantastic, and I'm tired of /o/ just being a cesspit of contrarians for the sake of seeming more sophisticated. All you have to do is shit on other people's opinion.

Go ahead, call me a faggot. It's all you know how to do around here.

File: gt4 st165.jpg (54KB, 800x460px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 800x460px

>>15840261
all the retards ITT

I can exactly believe it's an early 90's car because there is nothing else it could be. Possibly a mid to late 90s car, if I was an idiot.

Ahead of time it was not, but it was right on time and also timeless.

File: 7559049.jpg (63KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 633x758px

>>15837037

stop reminding me that we don't have the st205 gt4 over here. :(((((((((

>>15837037
I like them, but the Integra's still a better car, without needing a turbo or AWD.

>>15842072
Here we go again.