>Japan will never produce another fun car under $50,000

>>15803404
how much do you think the GTR, supra, nsx cost brand new?

adjust that shit for inflation nigga

>>15803410
People in the 90s generally had more disposable income than they do now, so adjusting for inflation is not a fair representation of relative "cost"

>>15803445
you'll still find they were not cheap like the 86.

quality cars cost money to make.

obviously not ferrari tier where you pay 100k for a badge, but the raw materials and labor are fucking somewhat costly, even with automation.

>>15803410

MR-2, GT-4, S2000, Evolution, RX-7 were.

dumb frogposter

>frs
>370z
>New supra set to start at $40k

>>15803465
Nobody said they were cheap, I'm saying that adjusting for inflation doesn't fairly represent their relative cost.

Oh cool another FRS hater that doesn't know what a clutch kick is.

>>15803609
sup reddit

File: 1424441588923.jpg (89KB, 463x366px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 463x366px

>>15803639
>New supra

>>15803639
>Rx-9
>Rx-8s are plentiful used
>Miata
>Civic Si (inb4 fwd)
>Possibly SFR
>Possibly 240sx replacement (idx/eau rouge)

Just another 'le born in the wrong generation there are no fun cars I can afford on my minwage neetbux'

>>15803686
Forgot to mention all the Japan only cars like the S600/1000 and AWD turbo alto