Rear wheel drive track/daily car

File: 2010-camaro-014[1].jpg (3MB, 3072x2048px)

3MB, 3072x2048px

I like the 2011-2014 Mustang GT and the 2010-2013 Camaro SS.

I don't like the Corvette C5; it's too archaic.

2007+ 350Z, E46 M3, or S2000. Only a 2010 Mustang GT with the 310hp 4.6 but definitely not a 5.0.

Could also do a high mileage Evo/STi.

Foxbody and the rest on mods

>muscleshit
>track

>>15801474
back to >>>/a/, weeb

File: C5RLights-1.jpg (100KB, 800x491px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 800x491px

>>15801478
Not even. I don't have a problem with Corvettes for example. But muscleshit is a lost cause in driving dynamics.

>>15801496
>Mustang is just as fast as an M3 of the same age
>"can't turn"

File: z06.jpg (53KB, 708x513px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 708x513px

>>15801474
this 2bh

>>15801496
>c5

lol

in practice a base c5 6spd would BTFO anything in this thread "round the track"

File: ta race.jpg (43KB, 726x484px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 726x484px

>>15801496
>has never driven a muscle car on a track

kek

>>15801502
>wet lap versus dry lap

sound too good to be true, is too good to be true

>>15801504
see >>15801502

File: 99 pontiac.png (1MB, 1388x539px)

1MB, 1388x539px

>300+ hp
>350 ft-lb torque
>3450lb
>5 sec 0-60
>0.91 g skid on good tire
>less than $10k all day

>>15801450
Damn I forgot to mention I need something with decent mileage, like 60/70k miles.

>>15801533
Maintenance history is a bigger factor than mileage.

>>15801405
Strongly considering 2011-14 GT mustang

>>15801515
I would but it doesn't feature any device to change its trajectory.

>10 to 15k
S197 mustang pre-facelift and spend the rest on mawdz.

>>15801528
literally lolcantturn

>>15801533
Then subtract the E46 M3/WRX STI/Evo.

Leaving you really the S2000, 07+ 350Z, and 2010 GT. Do you live in a salt state? Don't get the S2000, it WILL rust. Otherwise I'd get the Z. The Z and S2K will take the least effort to prep for track use. The GT is only in the running for having actual back seats and a big trunk, otherwise it's out handled by the Japanese cars and only marginally faster than the S2K.

>>15801541

It's pretty nice. I haven't driven the post-facelift S197, but my pre-facelift 2005 feels very heavy. It feels heavier than my Volt, despite the Volt weighing more.

>>15801521
>wet lap vs dry

>>15801368
2011-2014 GT or V6 Perfomance package Manual Mustang.
Can't go wrong with any of those.

File: Capture+_2016-09-11-22-08-37.png (363KB, 1440x2392px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1440x2392px

>>15801502
>A v6 Mustang is faster than a Corvette.

>Faster than a Track oriented Miata.

>FASTER THAN A CORVETTE

>>15801521
See
>>15804779

>>15804765
>Manual Mustang
>Getrag

There's plenty to go wrong, mate.

>>15804839
It feels like you are breaking something everytime you shift when the trans is cold but otherwise, its pretty durable.

>>15801368
Daily driver and track car should be mutually exclusive. You're an idiot if you want to track your daily, and also a car suitable to daily would be a shit track car anyway,
Buy a $2k Corolla, spend the rest on a dedicated track car.

>>15801533
Ohhh, you're taking out a loan which is why you want to go full retard and track your DD.

>>15801368
330, 330 zhp. m3's in that range won't be the cleanest.

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (272KB, 1920x1080px)

272KB, 1920x1080px

>>15801464
this to be honest