Tasteful Camber

>>15733344
That which improves performance and not degrades in any way.

>>15733344
Mexiflush

>>15733353
So between .5 and 1.0 (sometimes 1.5)?

Whats too much for one car is perfect for another. I find if you're looking for a good balance between handling and tire wear and you're still at the stock ride height, bring it into the yellow (hunter rack) on the negative side and give yourself a tiny bit of toe out on each front wheel for good turn in.

File: google.com-1.jpg (10KB, 245x206px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 245x206px

>>15733344
This.

>>15733387
Honestly even lower than .5

No more than 2 degrees

>>15733344

Whatever amount is needed to optimize the suspension geometry. I only need to run about -0.5 degree of static camber because I have plenty of travel and gain camber dynamically under compression which is superior anyway. If you don't have idea geometry or you have low travel you may need -3 degrees of static camber. Much more than that in a regular full bodied car that's not strangled by a rule book and you should probably consider redesigning your suspension.

>>15733344
you have to make the car look like it's about to shit itself

maximum camber yolo XDDDDDD

>>15733344
Enough to win the race.