Cars that are sheep in wolf's skin.

File: 1469669531465.jpg (49KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 500x667px

>>15732893
Do you understand that idium?

>>15732917
Cars that look fast but are slow.

File: 944.jpg (40KB, 700x465px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 700x465px

>>15732893

File: 1467686226937.jpg (45KB, 681x496px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 681x496px

>>15732972

>>15732989
>Torque: 162 lb-ft

>>15732893
DELET THIS

>>15732998
>torque means fast

Damn my truck must be a fucking super car then

>>15732998
From a NA 2.0-2.2 liter 4-banger making 240hp.

You'll get over it.

>>15732998
Haha it sucks for getting through swamps

>>15732942
Nevermind I read that backwards. I was trying to figure out on what planet the brz/frs is fast.

File: aquila-9.jpg (159KB, 1000x600px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1000x600px

I don't think it gets better than this

>106 hp 1.6 I4
>110 mph top speed
>disgustingly bad interior quality

File: 2011_Scion_tC_--_04-01-2011.jpg (2MB, 2208x1316px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2208x1316px

Anything marketed to a "young demographic"

>>15732980
Think you mean the other way around buddy

>>15733130
why was this even made/

>>15733144
Because they could.


...Oh wait, they went bankrupt after making a hundred or so of them.

>>15732917
You obviously don't, you can't even spell idiom correctly.

Current Gen Dodge Charger. Literally the best and thread-ending example.

>>15732954
They maybe dogs now but 200hp from an inline 4 wasn't anything to shake a stick at back in the 80's.

>>15732963
those never looked fast

File: 1461819418524.jpg (20KB, 477x347px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 477x347px

>>15733357

File: 2012-fisker-karma_100383009_l[1].jpg (234KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1024x768px

This thing.

>>15733040

>240hp is fast

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (111KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1920x1080px

>>15733140

Greatest young demographic car coming through.

>>15733106
>trying to figure out on what planet the brz/frs is fast
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=817BYPbHkdw

>>15733389

What was their design language on this thing? "Everything"?

>>15733399
>>240hp is fast
>hp is a measurement for speed
kys

>>15733377
I actually know someone who drives this. Absolutely disgusting.

>>15733377
>this weight 2.5 TONS

>>15733251
>707 hp edition available
fuck off

>>15733320
Ok now I don't think you understand that idiom

>>15732998
We're talking about cars, not tractors

File: 300ZX Z32.jpg (215KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1600x1066px

Too fucking heavy for its 3.0L. Beautiful interior though.

File: image.jpg (82KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 720x480px

>>15732893
Challenger

Golf GTI beats the R/T lol

>>15733400
looks like a hamster

>>15733516
Everything about that car is beautiful.
I really want one but I'm poor as fuck.

>>15733567
http://fortmyers.craigslist.org/col/cto/5746475990.html

>>15733656
Yeah I know they're cheap on CL but I can't pay for insurance and supposedly they're expensive to maintain too.

File: 1425855235283.jpg (1MB, 2048x1901px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1901px

>>15733357
Indeed.

>>15732989
>>15733040
except through most of the rev range, it makes less HP than an ND Miata. Only after the Miata hit the redline does the Honda start making power. 90% of the time, the S2000 is slower and heavier than the Miata.

File: 1472578715659.jpg (97KB, 800x769px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 800x769px

>>15733377
looks like it snorts when it laughs

Volvo 850R

>>15733737
I would fucking hope that a car made 10 years later is better, you fucking idiot

>>15733516
I had a 300zx TT,. It was heavy but 300hp stock was enough to move it.

File: scatpack2.jpg (123KB, 1007x639px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1007x639px

>>15733553

SXT or R/T maybe. Scat Pack or SRT? Nah.

>>15732893
Which is a shame, because the chassis is bloody brilliant.

>>15732954
My grandfather bought one new back in 87 and he still has it. Awesome car tho.

>>15733130
God damn that is ugly

>>15733950
>180whp
>almost 3000 lbs
why

>>15733950
it had so much potential. If it was pushing Rx-7 numbers I'd be tempted to get one as my next car.

>>15733997
even the turbo is slow kek

>>15733985
It was fast in its day, and had plenty of mid range power where you wanted it to be for a grand tourer

>>15734037
I have the turbo and I concur

>>15733894

I remember seeing a comparison chart between a Challenger SRT and a Mustang with the 3.7L V6 and track pack, and the Mustang was faster around a track.

Maybe an anon has it?

File: hwvgzriokfzktvnh8wg6[1].jpg (2MB, 2428x1366px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2428x1366px

>>15733562

Based hamster car.

>>15733662
Supposedly they're pretty light on maintenance, but if you're under 25, insurance is going to be insane.

>>15733894
Umm, yeah... That's why I specifically said
>R/T

File: IMAG_0411.jpg (458KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 2048x1360px

>>15734134

In a straight line, yes absolutely this. I have an n/a SW20 and it's like the polar opposite of a sleeper. Everyone wants to "race" you on the highway, and you'll lose to about 90% of them. At least it has more torque than my brother's Integra Type R lel

>>15733389
I know I was so excited for likeeping I'm gonna buy it this then I read the specs. Biggest disappointment of my 2016.

File: IMG_20160731_111937612_HDR_20160817082420049.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1536px

>>15732963

>>15734554
>buys a base model
>expects it to perform

i'm sorry you were too shit to buy a GT, i on the other hand will be busy whipping supras through the touge

>>15734607

I never said I expected it to perform well in a straight line. I knew it had low power. Also I said in a straight line, so you ain't wooping any Supra for shit on the highway with a 3S-GTE unless it's making like +80hp above stock. I'd woop a Supra on a tight touge too. Supras are pigfat as fuck.

>>15734665
boost increase and a bit of weight shedding and i was outpulling a mate of a mates MA70 and sitting on his arse through the twisties.

assuming stock vs stock
163kw @ ~1250kg vs 172kw @ 1540kg
mr2 comes out on top.