What is the best classic car experience for the least amount of money?

wtf is a "classic car experience"?

>>15721912
No ecoboost.

>>15721912
the experience of driving a classic car idiot

>>15721721
60s mustang if you can get one for nonboomer inflated prices. Easy to work on and parts common, plenty of resources and help availiable online for anything you need to do.

>>15721721
The cheapest 25 year old car in your local craiglist

>>15722028
25 years isn't old enough.
has to be pre 1980

>>15722031
By law in Amerifat, any car 25 years or older is an antique

File: 17xx1s6u44nusjpg.jpg (73KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 800x450px

>>15721721
Old subarus. Parts are cheap and not hard to come by, there's a fairly large community for them, and they're reliable as fuck. Try to get at late 70's one with the 1.8.

There's a guy on here with an immaculate orange 74 DL coupe, he says he loves it and he gets compliments on it all the time.

>>15722051
no, that's by state.

>>15721958
Then I guess it's buying some $300 pile and driving it the few miles until it breaks then calling the scrappers.

>>15722051
>>15722031

25 years is typically the age a car needs to meet to be considered classic.
But other facts such as availability now also are commonly used to determine if it's a classic.

An 89 Camry certainly wouldn't be seen as a classic, but there's a good argument to be made that the Wagoneer is.

>>15721958
Cheapest? Drive a friend's or your Dad's classic car for a few minutes.
That's free.

89-91 honda civic/crx

File: Sierra-1.jpg (43KB, 798x428px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 798x428px

RWD fun for 500 EUR, provided you're an EUfag.

>>15722721
Cozzie is 8 grand.

:(

>>15722740
Sadly.
But you can still have a decent amount of fun with the standard models
http://www.auto24.ee/used/2328072
Plus i think they look great, inside and out.

>>15721958
That's easy, any 2016 VAG or FCA car. You'll break down every time you roll out of the driveway, exactly like a 60s car.

>>15721912

Driving a land barge without power steering, power braking, etc, etc and having it break down constantly. Not to mention the subpar performance.

>>15722023
This is pretty close to accurate.
Not only the mustang but Falcon, and the first Chevy II's that GM put out to compete with it.

It should be:
>A 2500-3000 pound car from the 60's (no heavier than a 1st gen Camaro)
>with an optional small v8 and 4-speed
>stick axle / leaf spring
>power steering (it will be overboosted, but unassisted steering boxes from this era are ultra-slow-ratio)

Don't waste your time chasing the hi-po engine options, boomers have made them unobtainium and a 2-bbl 289 or equivalent is plenty to get the "experience".

>>15721912
slow and noisy unless you buy super luxury
attempts to murder you at every turn
breaks down all the time but is easy to fix
super rare parts that no amount of money can buy