Is it even worth it or should i just go with a Toyota GT86 ?

>>15719821
They're very different cars OP

>>15719859
>They're very different cars OP
So that's why we keep reading "Buy a BRZ? Just get an WRX STi instead, it's faster"?

>Should I get a fat turd, or a slow turd?

>>15720160
Theyre in the same price bracket...that's pretty much all they have in common.

WRX vs. BRZ. STI is like another 10k more.

>>15720184
>Theyre in the same price bracket
>is like another 10k more
Which one is then?

>>15720198
No, the usual comparisons are the BRZ/FRS twins with the WRX. Hence, the comparison

An STI is one notch higher in price and performance.

>>15719821
This generation of STI isn't worth it, period. Not when the WRX is 95% as good for 75% of the price.

WRX isn't as "fun" but it's much, much more capable. Roommate bought a 2016, says the handling is great, tons of grip, good amount of power, but it's not very fun. You have as much fun as a passenger as you do a driver; not enough steering and road feel, apparently.

So it depends what you want. I personally wouldn't choose the BRZ over the WRX, but I'm a fan of value, and there is no value in a BRZ. If I wanted to go slowly around a corner in a non-cloud of eco-plastic tire smoke, I'd buy a go cart for a hundredth the price.

>>15719821
are u bunta or dagumi

File: 1462416992573.jpg (102KB, 460x258px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 460x258px

>>15719821

>>15721389
What did he mean by this?

File: 1391303475010.jpg (96KB, 1535x672px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1535x672px

get the WRX.

>>15721410
The midget

Fuck, get an older STI

File: 1414164276021.gif (1MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x480px

>>15720363
>WRX uses brand new engine with direct injection and much more usable torque
>STI uses a clunky turbo lag machine that was last revised a decade ago and is known to be not very reliable

LMAO @ people who bought 2015+ STIs. Fucking cucks.

File: 1465092580392.png (25KB, 656x620px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 656x620px

>>15721557
b-b-b muh diff. muh trackday. muh subbie rumble dood

>>15721411
does whoever made this know they wrote "greater than $400 difference"?

>>15721557
The only reason I can think of is that it doesn't look as shit as the WRX. The WRX just looks terrible. The STI is only a little better though. Also it's only a few grand more to get an STI with some options than it is to get a WRX with the same. I saw a very base WRX on the lot for 31k, and then an STI for 36k with the alcantara seats, infotainment, and a few STI "performance" goodies.

>>15721662
Still feels wrong that the higher trim has the outdated engine. Not that its bad thing or anything.

I think this situation is pretty rare, never saw a sports car do this before.

>>15721833
>wrx
>sports car

wew lad

>>15720198
>which one is more
the fucking turbo one retard.