thoughts?

File: nissanscum.jpg (12KB, 355x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 355x360px

>>15701125

>>15701139
>nissans cum
Yes they do.

is this actually considered a supercar? i always see it as a really fast sports car. it has shit like a backup camera. i can't see this as exotic or super. it can also make way more power, it's limited. how can that be super? four doors, all wheel drive, automatic, it's just off.

>>15701125
>v6
>automatic transmission
>awd
>convertible

This is commuter car territory regardless of performance.

File: 1460228090843.gif (561KB, 119x152px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 119x152px

>>15701231
>commuter car territory
>faster than a Ferrari enzo

i guess formula one pre 2004 were grocery getters since they had automatic transmissions and were roofless.

they made it into a barbie car

ugly as the murano convertible only faster

>>15701202
> four doors
Since when does a gtr come with 4 doors?

File: SHIT.jpg (200KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1280x853px

>>15701231

>>15701642
some lady always drives one of those around where i live
its honestly one of the ugliest things ive seen

>>15701125
Convertibles always weight more than the equivalent coupe, and the GT-R coupe already weighs more than enough.

The new murano cross cabriolet is looking really angry.

>>15701125
WHY would you want to make such a pigfat heavy car.... even heavier?

>>15701250
>lap times are all that matters
sorry m8

>>15701125
gross

>>15701125
Looks like a giant scary person is hiding in the passenger side.

>>15701231
are you stupid?

it does not have an automatic, it has a dual clutch manual.

you better be shitposting

>>15701202
Good bait
And here, I will still bite:
>most supercars are "automatic"
>most supercars have a backup camera
>many many supercars are AWD
>GTR doesnt have 4 doors
>most supercars can make way more power and are limited

that said, it's definitely debatable whether it really is a supercar.
I think front engine doesn't disqualify it from being one though, like many people say.

>>15703643
100% spooked right now.

>>15702580
Faster in a straight line, faster around corners, faster around a track

how much more do you want?

>>15703690

it has a transmission that shifts automatically

it is an automatic

>>15703643
Looks like if Patrick from Spongebob was black and possessed

>>15701125

okay

the gtr's only selling point is that it is fast
and its biggest weakness is its weight

so we increase its weight and lower it's performance capabilities

but idiots would still buy a fat Nissan that can do 0-60 in 3.8s

>>15703690
Not a manually operated clutch, not a manual. Simple as that.

>>15703727
somebody took 400 pounds out of a GTR and it was slower.

Where are you getting 3.8s from?
The 2017 GTR has a 0-60 time of 2.7 seconds, what makes you think becoming a convertible would lower it by over a second?

>>15703690
Almost got me, nice bait.

>>15703747

where are you getting that someone removed 400 lbs from a gtr and it was slower?

>>15703759
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/nissan/gt-r/2014/2014-nissan-gt-r-japanese-spec-drive/

Nissan performance chief engineer Kazutoshi Mizuno

“For example, if we were to lighten the GT-R by 200 pounds, its 0-60 mph sprint time would fall from 2.7 seconds to around 3.3 seconds.

And its stopping distance (from 60 to zero) would stretch from 99 feet to around 115 feet,” explains Mizuno.

“The ratio we have now is the ideal one. Only this time, our modifications make it an even better car to drive!”


Matt Farah said 400, but he was wrong a bit and I believed him.

File: pigfatgtrmeme.png (137KB, 650x428px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 650x428px

>>15703759
>>15703804
Oh, and on top of that

>>15703804
>Nissan engineers
>understanding Newton's first law
Pick one, and only one

File: image.jpg (119KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 800x600px

Needs to be a folding hardtop for maximum pigfastness.
If they can get over two metric tons it's perfect.

>>15703831
>Nissan engineers
>Abiding by newton's first law
fixed

File: AU1270243.jpg (144KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 800x533px

>>15703843
This thing abided Newton's laws just fine.

>>15703831

you are a moron

>>15703643
im glad im not the only one who saw that

>>15703848
Explain to me how something can accelerate faster if it is heavier.

F=m*a. F is constant (the engine does not change), so for a greater mass, acceleration will be slower.

Seems to me that Nissan engineers just failed physics class. Certainyl explains stuff like the Murano CC, and their LMP project.

>>15703847
and look at all the things it won
>>15703853
Grip you fucking mongoloid
I would say go back to high school physics class but it's more likely you haven't gotten there yet

>>15703853
More traction.

>>15703853
>>15703857
And that isn't even the fucking law, something can accelerate faster if it's heavier very simply:
If it's falling. (in gravity at least)

File: AU1270243.jpg (40KB, 280x321px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 280x321px

>>15703857
>and look at all the things it won
Pic related.

Grip? Static friction is dicated by a friction coefficient and weight. In automotive terms, this friction coefficient is determined by number of driven wheels, tire section and tire compound.

Sure, considering a non-sufficient friction coefficient, more weight would be better. However, a GT-R's friction coefficient is already ridiculously high, given it's AWD layout, wide tires (255 and 285 front and back, respecitvely), and decent rubber compound (BS Potenza's). It should have plenty of grip.

>>15703860
>AWD
>255/285 tires
>Decent rubber
It doesn't need traction.

>>15703863
>heavy objects accelerate faster than light objects in a vacuum
Please go take a physics class

>>15703843
Pls explain to me how Nissan engineers don't understand Newton's first law.

>>15703868
That's the joke m80, you said "This thing abided by Newton's laws just fine" and it didn't win shit
>>15703869
The joke is that the car is so fast that Nissan engineers broke the laws of physics

>>15701125

This doesnt feel like a car for summer beach cruises.

>>15703868
>It doesn't need traction
wew almost got me there

>heavy objects accelerate faster than light objects in a vacuum

>gravity
>vacuum
pick one
A true vacuum has nothing in it faggot

>>15703868

https://youtu.be/z0LzVoLiVCw

It can always use more traction. If you want to reduce weight you need more downforce.

>>15703871
Wot. If it's a joke it's a pretty shit one. What does Newton's first law have to do with the gtr being fast ???

>>15701471
The old one

File: 1455366580439.jpg (23KB, 500x585px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x585px

>>15703883

>wake up
>still no hope to own a gt-r

>>15703920
Such is life.

>>15702580
M-m-muh manual driving experience!