From Left - Right
>Dodge Challenger T/A
>Dodge Challenger T/A 392
>Dodge Charger Daytona 392
>Dodge Charger Daytona
>>15641007
Article - http://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/woodward-dream-cruise/2016/08/16/dodge-unveils-two-special-edition-cars-wodward-dream-cruise/88823086/
>>15641007
1 car, 2 body styles and 4 trims.
Do either of the chargers have a stick?
>>15641032
Nope. The Challenger comes standard with a 6-speed manual.
>>15641007
I'd take the Challenger and swap the Charger front panels on.
>>15641007
Dodge really is milking these two untill they're absolutely obsolete. New, lighter platform when, FCA?
>>15641029
Just because they're on the same platform doesn't mean they're the same car.
>>15641032
Nope. Charger would need a complete safety re-test (and structural changes to pass that test) if they put a stick in it. AFAIK it fits, it works, but IIHS is being a little bitch.
>>15641577
>implying that's even possible
>>15641590
Is it still the same platform as when it was reintroduced in 2006 or did they update it in 2011 when they redesigned the styling?
>>15641592
Why not? They're the same car, I'd imagine the major differences would be behind the B pillar
>no ecoboost
baka
>>15641636
Still the same Mercedes-based platform, yeah. They just did some minor styling updates.
>>15641654
They're not the same car, with substantial differences in the front valence.
>>15641007
>Dodge
>Still making cars
>In 2017
How long until the next bankruptcy?
>>15641577
I did it on paint just because I was too curious about how it'd look like.
>>15641912
damn it looks great
>>15641912
SRT Charger front end looks like shit though. Could you try the regular (R/T and below) front end instead?
>>15641938
Tried getting a better angle a lot but this is all I could do.
>>15642001
Same guy.
I think it looks better in the thumbnail.