What is your favourite Mustang?

File: 11802829_10154056665507977_3826899314082-1.jpg (104KB, 2048x1251px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 2048x1251px

>>15538901

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (520KB, 3000x2250px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 3000x2250px

>>15538901

2007-2009 Shelby GT500 convertible

File: 83roadtrackcover_84mustangs.jpg (55KB, 400x554px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 400x554px

I find it irresistible when Americans go "yeah, we don't normally do that kinda stuff because we think it's stupid but everyone else is doing it and it's working out for them so now we're going to try it, too" and in a way foreshadow the distant future of their own car industry but in a clumsy, out of place way. Like a turbocharged, electronically fuel injected four cylinder in a pony car in the early '80s.

File: 1990_00009_01.jpg (37KB, 640x398px)

37KB, 640x398px

Strangely enough, this one. Second place would be the current GT.

If we were speaking about classics, I would prefer a Torino or Falcon.

File: 1451607511712.jpg (107KB, 400x400px)

107KB, 400x400px

>>15538967

File: image.jpg (42KB, 480x300px)

42KB, 480x300px

>>15538967
The LX is so much better looking tbhfam

>>15538950
SVO is my favourite looking Fox though

File: 2012-Ford-Mustang-GT.jpg (289KB, 640x426px)

289KB, 640x426px

If i could somehow have 2005-2009 body with 2010-2012 front end id be sold. Coyote swap of course.

>>15539022
And glass roof

Had a brand new 5.0l 2017 Stang drive by me today

Look...

Good but Ford left a bad taste in my mouth.

File: 1971_00041_05.jpg (74KB, 800x492px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 800x492px

>>15538901
1971 Mustang Mach 1 with the 429SCJ, Ram Air, Drag Pack, and a 4 speed manual.

File: 49610_Rear_3-4_Web.jpg (137KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 500x375px

>>15538979
I prefer the GT bumpers, familia. And these funky rear lights.

File: KING.jpg (226KB, 1000x666px)

226KB, 1000x666px

>>15538901
The King of them All

Fox Body and 1st Gen

File: competiton_orange.jpg (87KB, 1024x679px)

87KB, 1024x679px

>>15538901
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lQX3cOAbes

File: hZac123.jpg (80KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1024x682px

>>15538901
SN95
>dat 90s bubble styling

File: 1995_00007_01.jpg (51KB, 800x507px)

51KB, 800x507px

This one desu

File: 1465130442495.jpg (1MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1152px

S197 Coyote 5.0

Close second would be a 87 notchback with t tops.

>>15538941
>when you see the last-light before you are meant to die

>>15539149
Why are the headlights smaller than usual?

The only good mustangs of course. 03-04 Cobra, and the new GT350R

File: 1420089067303.jpg (879KB, 4272x2848px) Image search: [Google]

879KB, 4272x2848px

>>15539183
Apex knows.

File: 01-shelby-gt-350-barn-find.jpg (552KB, 1400x795px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 1400x795px

>>15538901
1966 GT350

File: 4747493982_8c185fd54d_o.jpg (1MB, 2888x1810px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2888x1810px

this one

>>15539063
My dad has one of those with a custom built 400cid engine made from Boss 351 parts. It's pretty nice.

>>15540002
did you drive it

Foxbody.

Tempted to buy one and use it as a DD.
Probably get an A/T

>>15538941
Holy fuck epic pic what ended up happening ...

>>15540004
Yup. It's surprisingly nice to drive. Don't know how they drive with stock chassis, though.

>>15540011
What does DD and A/T stand for ?

New to /o/

>>15540029
daily driver = DD

>>15540029
AT is automatic and MT is manual

>>15540042
Thanks .

File: 1989_ford_probe-pic-3068796762894512184.jpg (977KB, 1600x1195px)

977KB, 1600x1195px

The 89 Probe GT Turbo.

>>15540029
Lurk moar

>>15540034
>>15540042
>spoonfeeding

>>15540094
>>spoonfeeding

Fuck of to >>>/a/ faggot

>>15540094
this aint your secret club pal

>>15539063
This. I also love 68 fastbacks.

File: 2004_MG_ZT_260_V8_003_1725.jpg (404KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1600x1200px

>>15538901
This one

File: 262489.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>mustang boss 429 (1969)
>185 000 dollar
>officiallly 385 HP, but tested 500 HP

The dream mustang.

>>15540701
It looks like a bigger porsche

>>15540701
is that matt farah's

File: 9504_MTRP_06_I_COBRA-C-3200.jpg (39KB, 660x308px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 660x308px

I've always had a thing for the 1995 Cobra R. It wasn't even that mind blowing back then. I guess I liked the concept and the unique 351 motor.

File: 1432834323656.jpg (677KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 1024x768px

so this mustang gets reposted a lot on /o/
who's car is it? whats been done to it?

>>15541091
so how well did they do on a track compared to say, a c5? i assume it had huge brakes right? did it have at least subframes?

File: ssdfsd.jpg (164KB, 1066x800px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1066x800px

I own a black 89 LX 5.0 but I'd love a black 70 boss 429.

>>15538901
None of them

>implying I like American garbage
This world would be better if you sorry cunts got glassed.

>>15541116
I think a regular C4 Corvette would probably beat this thing, a '96 C4 Grand Sport certainly would...to say nothing of a C5.

>>15541148
i dunno. i thought the R were not street legal were they, and you had to be in the scca to buy one?

>>15541127
sup you poor leb

>>15541148
my c4 handles unlike anything i've ever been in. certainly incomparable to a mustang, even with suspension mods worth the price of an entire c4.

>>15541116
Oops didn't answer the rest of your question.

It had stiffer springs, adjustable shocks, a strut tower brace, wider 255 section tires... no subframes as far as I know.

The engine was a 5.8L and the final drive ratio was upped to 3.27 from 3.08.

It did have a large 20 gallon fuel tank.

Relatively minor upgrades all things consider, but I thought the idea was fun.

File: Bullitt-Mustang-McQueen-9.jpg (78KB, 1869x1240px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1869x1240px

I want one...

>>15541183
i would have thought subframes and maybe a rollcage was part of the deal. not even brembos?

>>15541151
I think they are street legal, but you are right Ford wouldn't sell this to you unless you had a license and intended to race it.

You can find mothballed examples of them for sale with super low miles.

>>15541196
i can kinda see a rollcage in it. maybe

>>15541192
Not that I can tell... I would have thought the same, so I went back and dug this up.

No subframes mentioned.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/1995-ford-mustang-svt-cobra-r-review

>>15541207
sounds like the SVT was slacking.
any ford brother knows the first thing the car needs is subframes. even for street use they are very noticeable.

and why stick a bigger motor in and not give it bigger brakes?

>>15541217

Yeah I definitely don't know. Like I said, it wasn't even that spectacular back in 1995, but I just thought it was an interesting one-off.

The rotors were the same, but I'm willing to wager the pad compound was more aggressive.

Keeping the same rotor would lower the costs for a team or individual keeping this thing fielded through a season when you are burning through a set of pads and rotors on any given weekend... but I'm speculating.

I can see how the larger fuel tank and cooling would be important for track duty.

But yeah, I have not clue why they passed on subframes.

>>15538901
>only 300 made

How quick were these?

>>15541257
Low 13s/High 12s in the 1/4 mile, 0-60 in the mid/high 4s.

It had a 385hp/385tq 5.4L 4V motor. Not bad for the turn of the century.

File: Image 9.jpg (351KB, 974x568px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 974x568px

Shelby from Gone in 60 s.

It was my first auditory encounter with a tru V8.
I almost cried.

>>15541273
thats pretty quick man. did randy pobst drive one?

File: yfk4igoo8ptkejm4zuxm.jpg (172KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1024x768px

>>15539894
>>15539975
my niggas

>>15538901
none because the camaro easily beats it in every single way possible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfSUeDJa9ls

>>15541928
i like how nobody picked block's mustang.

i even like this one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHSEO7-AnmM

File: 2784900514_2836464f0e_o.jpg (144KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1280x960px

>>15541086

Its from before Fatt Farah was driving, built in 1989.

the flares are sheet metal, has IRS from a MN-12 thunderbird and currently has a '95 Cobra R spec 351w but in 1989 it had a 320" short deck Windsor

>>15538906
Is this a roush?

>>15542164
sounds like its faster than his then.

>>15542370
Fatt Farah's mustang isnt very fast...

File: deadstockmustang.jpg (33KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 640x400px

>>15542378
well its not like i was wrong then.
its not like i wanted one anyway.

>>15538901
How good were these? better than 03 cobra?

>Had an 07 Mustang
>Got bored and sold it because I got sick of automatic after buying a manual Miata
>Fast forward 2 years, thinking of selling my 370z (which I replaced the Mustang with, still have the Miata and plan on keeping it) for a manual 2011 GT
How bad of an idea is this? Seems Ferd upgraded the shit out of everything including the handling, power and interior but I don't want to get fucked on depreciation. That and holy fuck these niggers are common.

>>15542396
>>15542440
>>15542445
haha epic where's the like button xd

File: nine two eight.jpg (46KB, 500x358px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x358px

>>15538901
>What is your favourite Mustang?

The ones with no solid rear axle

The Yenko Camaro is my favorite mustang

File: image.jpg (108KB, 750x469px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 750x469px

>>15542445
>>15542440
>as fast as the Ultimate Driving Machine

bump because bored

>>15541928
>>15541189
>>15541117
Gorgeous

69-70 Mach 1 or the 66 GT350.

>>15538901
Cobra type R like in OP.... drooool.... so much time spent in forza 1

>>15541103
That doesn't belong to anyone here, it's just cool because it's a foxbody dressed up as a V8 Interceptor Falcon.

>seeing all these sexy GT and Cobra pics and im just sitting here with a 2000 v6

>>15542143
Ken Block's mustang isn't really a mustang, it's a custom awd chassis with a mustang coupe body

>>15538901
The kind that can corner

< Heres a picture of one

>>15543865
t. Yuro butthurt because Mustangs provide better price/performance ratio (both off AND on track) than any Germoney car

File: 1275976897429.jpg (559KB, 1290x848px)

559KB, 1290x848px

>>15543900
I like Mustangs, and as an American, they can't corner. If you want a cornering pony car, you get an F-body. It's that simple. Sure, some models (cough80scough) weren't as fast as the Mustangs in a straight line, but the Mustang was always shown a set of F-body tail lights when the course got twisty.

>>15543946
You realize Mustangs newer than 2010 exist right.

>>15543946
f-body is sexy af, X100 if lowered with wheels sticking out a couple of inches.

File: 2010-Camaro-Rear-Sway-Bar-Tubular-25mm-C10-RSB-100-11.jpg (207KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 800x533px

>>15543961
and the 2010+ Camaro still outhandles it every time, the ONLY exception being the new Shelby GT350.
You know. Because the Camaro got an IRS as standard equipment on all models in 2010. The Mustang didn't get one standard on all models until 2015. That said, 2010-2015 Camaro's use the Zeta chassis and 2016+ use the Alpha chassis. Then again, the Mustang is on its fifth new chassis (64-73, 74-78, 79-04, 05-14, 15+) while the Camaro is only on its third.

>>15542512
pls respond.

File: 1967-ford-mustang-gta-ian-pete-geoghegan-touring-car.jpg (12KB, 375x250px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 375x250px

I have a thing for 65-67 notchbacks.

File: 1279263482520.jpg (185KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1024x683px

>>15544120
And people wonder why the Camaro handled better.

>>15538901
I like the first gens of course, but I also like Foxes bc they're great platforms for building, and termi cobras are cool too. The new GT350R is also good.