/o/ which is superior a big V6 or a Turbo 4 cylinder?
Depends on what you want out of it and which specific engines you're comparing.
what about a turbocharged v6?
>>15500481
Most turbo 4's can put out more power then a v6 with just a tune.
>>15500481
E C O B O O S T
C
O
B
O
O
S
T
>>15500508
well thats pretty overkill, im talking about any 4 cylinder that competes with a most basic V6, 3.5 3.7 could be anything like Nissans VQ for example against a turbo 2.0 4 cylinder, looks like every car maker is going for them now, even infiniti
>>15500508
>>15500525
lateposting as usual, alphonse.
>>15500481
The bongs who tuned the FQ evo got 440hp out of a 2.0L turbo 4.
Not many V6/I6s can beat that.
Turbo 5.
>>15500532
Well the turbo 4 cylinder setups are usually quite a bit lighter. That could translate into better fuel economy and handling (definitely reduces front weight bias)
>>15500481
big v8. no replacement for displacement.
also depends on the car and the application
if it SW20 mr2? v6 has more torks that the 4 cylinder with a hairdryer can provide.
>>15500542
This.
>>15500543
two cars that would argue that:
>mercedes benz 190/230e
>volvo 240 series
engines too heavy for the bodyshells. needs a bigger engine to haul them around.
>>15500547
>>15500542
FWD btfo
>>15500571
>implying
The FWD 850R was better than the AWD V70R.
Muh vee-eyht is better
>>15500537
>alphonse.
hahaha
I havent heard that serbian's faggot name is so long
>>15500481
a V8.
Doesn't the VQ37 have shit FI potential due to its high compression?
>>15500481
inline 6
>>15500508
I've heard good things about the turboed V6.
>>15500481
Twincharged I4.
>>15500481
NRFD. All that needs to be said.