Got back from the dyno today New engine had a few faults and

>>15407411
aw fuck yeah nigga

nice
what car is it in

File: on the dyno i.jpg (107KB, 1080x974px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1080x974px

>>15407424
the WAT CRX

>>15407431
Eggscellent.

File: Feature image.jpg (988KB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]

988KB, 3872x2592px

>>15407441
A good reason to upgrade IMO

>>15407464
>forged aftermarket rods
how does that even happen

>>15407474
ARP bolt sheared...
Also.... apparently revving the ever-living piss out of an engine isn't.... helpful....

>>15407483
>rod bolt
oh yes

How high was it bro? Did you moneyshift?

>>15407483
Yeah, generally speaking it's good to be nice to your engine.

>>15407493
>>15407494
I am pretty sure I down shifted to around 8500 RPM in a d16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu6-rbMHWp0

>>15407411
do you plan on turboing it ?

File: 1443457955963.jpg (63KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 500x375px

>inb4 the range is only 0-100 (hp and lbs-ft)

>>15407508
NO
>>15407521
LMAO
I would seriously be crying myself to sleep if that were true

>>15407531
What was the actual horsepower peak then?

>>15407531
>tfw I drive fwd
I want to die

>>15407411
>fwd
>90hp
wat stickers check out

do you autocross it too? there's a class (STS?) at my autocross where it's all honda civic hatches and crx. the way the maneuver is ridiculous

>>15407561
248hp

>>15407531
Post the full image then!

>>15408421
Are you saying my car can't do that?

>tfw friends been posting some dude's crx all day while it was at the dyno
>h23/b seriez trans
>talking about how it's going to shit all over the v8s in our local scene
>dyno sheet comes up
>201 fwhp
Lmfao.

>>15407497
>downshifted to around 8500rpm
that engine wouldnt make it past 7200 how did you get 8500?

File: 1334329164853.jpg (18KB, 366x380px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 366x380px

>>15408392
retard detected

>>15408483
asshurt 90hp fwd detectioned

>>15408439
anyone can autox i'm just wondering if he competes in anything else

>>15408507
No apparently only civics can and anything over 2600 pounds is worthless

>>15408531
your gtr is shit bruh

>>15408535
I don't have one. I drive a FWD car at 2700 pounds

>>15408537
rip 100 lbs too heavy

>>15408476
mechanical overrev most likely. Happens when you do crazy stuff like accidentally shift from second to first instead of second to third

>>15408539
Why are you so mean

>>15408549
my father never said i love you, and I drive to kill the feels

>>15408476
I was regularly going over 8k with the d16a6, when you remove the rev limiters, engines do things they shouldn't.
>>15408474
That doesn't seem right for a 2.3 liter H series
>>15407561
everyone is so worried about a number, It's not the best but it is damn better than what I was winning with.

>>15409627
Should i buy a CRX for $250 and turn it into a shitbox to track

>>15409627
>dyno charts
>no numbers
what's the point

>>15407411
Looks like a downgrade...

The (dark line) has significantly more *usable* power and torque at 4500 RPM. The (light line) is very peaky with all it's gain is between 6500-7500 RPM, which doesn't help much in daily driving.

>>15410080
this is a racekar

>>15409627
Just tell us the number you fag

File: FB_IMG_1468076847948.jpg (104KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1080x1080px

>>15409627
According to the post it's only got an intake and open longtubes.

Still a 14 second car with that heavy ass engine only making 200 fwhp. I wouldn't have even bothered.

>dumps 7k into an engine
>dynos it
>starts thread
>won't say how much power it makes
Lol

>>15410246
probably around 130whp and 90 lb ft

>>15409627
I used to be a fan of your racing and shit, but today you're just another attention whoring tripfaggot.

>>15410080
I.... are you kidding here? this car is on the track and nothing else
>>15410584
Sorry?
>>15410345
That was the old engine lol

>>15409962
Good luck if it isn't a shell or rusted into infinity. Theyre getting hit the hardest with the FWD rice tax.

>>15410964
At least where I am, you can still get decent ones for a good price. Lots of ricer modfags though.

>>15410823
>That was the old engine lol

I remember you posting a dyno of it and it was more like 100whp

but whatever

I guess this is around 150-160 and 110-120 then

>>15411004
I have never dyno'd one that low
It was 129HP and 127 on the first tune

>honda people spend thousands on an engine swap, dyno tuning, etc.
>make less hp than a smart car
I really don't get it at all.

>>15411438
>smart car
>250hp

>>15411438
doesn't a smart put like 65 WHP out?

>>15410203
there's no fucking way a b16 with an intake and headers makes 200whp lmao try 150.

It makes 170 at the wheels. So about 30hp over stock. I don't know why he won't show the numbers. We can deduce it from your previous d16 whp number.

>>15411479
he was talking about the 2.3 liter h series
>>15411526
basically letting people make their guesses with lots of clues *shrugs* it's less than I wanted but I definitely need to resolve some issues.

>>15411576
Stop being a fag

>>15408474
That's how I felt about my first fast car

>man, this thing is so fast
>dyno it
>258 wheel hp

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

https://youtu.be/PviZkOjIER8
video of dyno pull posted

>>15411623
>whenvteckicksin.jpg

what numbers did you make? can't see them in the graph

>>15411614
in a 2500 lb car, that would be a wheel power to weight ratio close to a brand new mustang gt

If that was in your crown vic interceptor, I feel bad for you. generally, 258 is low, but power has to be contextualized before saying
>"hurr durr fwd slow!"

>>15412059
My car weighs 3200 so the power/weight isn't there, sadly

>>15412059
>I-I-In a 2500lb car!
258 wheel hp is slow in any fucking car.

Show me a full weight street car with stereo, A/C, full interior, glass, etc. on street tires running 12s with 258 hp. Pro-tip: You can't.

>>15411614
It's what happens with most early 5.0/4.6 mustang guys. They think their exhausts and stuff puts them in a higher bracket and then they go and dyno and want to puke.

File: 141006102517-alfa-romeo-4c-1024x576.jpg (298KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1024x576px

>>15412458

On a semi-related note to the recent posts, just how retarded would I be to build a track car with a power:weight of 2:1? Completely serious.

I've raced karts and stuff, but even with the best setup and chassis in the world, would 2:1 be too ridiculous and a total waste of time? Has there ever even been a non-strip car with figures like that?

>>15412674
>power:weight of 2:1
like 2200hp in a 1100kg car?
or 5000hp in a 2500lb car?

File: 1432139299204.jpg (46KB, 340x314px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 340x314px

>>15412458
>>15412525

lmao rekt

>>15412706
Roughly 990hp in a 480kg car. I'm torn between a twin-turbo 2.8 V8, or the NA version which makes ~500hp. Obviously, I don't intend for it to have any reliability at all, and will be serviced between every track outing.

>>15412458
top kek, you just went full retard anon. I guess that's what mustang ownership does to you. Better luck next time faggot.

>>15412458
You would be hard pressed to get into the 12's in any street car that isn't a v8. 258hp isn't FAST but it's not slow either.

>>15412759
>mustang ownership
???

>>15413069
It's slow as fuck. A 14 second car is fucking slow.

>>15414025
it's time to stop posting, anon.

>>15412743
>>15412706
>>15412674
all of that for a track day car?
why not build something that fits in a racing class?

>>15408425
sure it is, prob 148 to the wheels with 80% of the increase only usable in the last 1k. still prob pretty peppy in that little tin can

>>15415469
to be fair, it is right where I need it for road racing
5500+
I don't think I would really drop out of the VTEC range on track unless I slow for an incident