If bikes are so much faster than cars why did a car beat 90%

lolcantturn

>>15248214
Bikes don't have the aero, or the grip cars do in the corners.

Literally the contact patch per tire is even less.

>10% were still faster than the car tho.

So bikes are still faster than cars?

>>15248244
only because you need like 800hp to push past 170mph
if there was more turn it would shamble the bikes

>>15248214
>90%
So it lost to 10% of the bikes there? sounds pretty slow

bikes are faster than your corolla, thats for sure

>>15248214
K... Keep me posted

cue butthurt wannabe rossi commuters on stock r6s

>>15248214
hey, its that crazy schizo twitter guy

>>15248287
t. corolla driver

>>15248297
t. commuter squid

>>15248304
>tfw have both a car and a bike

stay angered, cuck

>>15248214
If cars are so fast, why do they get absolutely raped by planes?

Besides, what's reliable, does the 1/4 mile stock below 10seconds and cost less than 15k ? Not any car that I know of

>>15248625
>straight lines
>stock
hello rebbit

>>15248625
If planes are so fast, why do they get destroyed by rockets?