Any engine below a V8 is shit!

Here's your (you)

File: image.jpg (555KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 1024x1024px

>>15227021
I agree senpai. They think that inline 4s are real engines kek!

File: 615191_420621797990466_1381053299_o.jpg (158KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1024x768px

>>15227021
Good thing rotaries are above v8. Kek

>>15227021
Formula 1 uses v6

my dirtbike doesn't have a v8

File: cf538c211f84e60777be2e390691dde58737d3378b3f16d18557ba09deeb9275.jpg (26KB, 368x243px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 368x243px

>>15227046

File: godmachine.jpg (375KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1920x1280px

turbo V6 > V8

File: 1425855235283.jpg (1MB, 2048x1901px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1901px

>>15227021
kek, this.

File: download (3).jpg (10KB, 276x183px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 276x183px

5-in-line >> V8

File: Audi_Quattro_-_2007_Rallye_Deutschland_(cropped).jpg (490KB, 1772x1316px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 1772x1316px

>>15227080
This is correct.

>>15227068
>those brake discs
qt

but >v6

not qt

>>15227025
>Here's your (you)
You have no idea how that works, do you summerfag?

File: bad-smell-stinks-640.jpg (31KB, 620x350px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 620x350px

>>15227068
LOL

File: 2010_911_GT3_engine.jpg (2MB, 2496x1765px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2496x1765px

The premise of this thread is flawed.

>>15227089
>not dealing in counterfeit (You)s

File: DlOMkvE.jpg (399KB, 1614x1212px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 1614x1212px

>>15227140

File: 1465334351350.png (230KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 640x360px

>>15227046
>six cylinder rotary being above eight cylinder v8

fuck outta here

File: Regera_Airstrip1.jpg (660KB, 4096x2731px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 4096x2731px

>>15227068

>>15227435
makes way more power

>>15227046
>>15227056
>>15227435
4 rotor = v8
https://youtu.be/5jTTMxtv2PY
https://youtu.be/OjwwV20iZYE

>>15227435
>eight cylinder v8
s opposed to a 4 cylinder v8?

>>15227079
[/thread]

>>15227541
yeah V8 is the configuration
I personally prefer 12 Cylinder V8s over 8 cylinder V8s but they both are better than any cylinder V6

File: absolutely BTFO.jpg (54KB, 532x757px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 532x757px

im on it

File: mus cam.jpg (36KB, 544x377px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 544x377px

>>15227588

>>15227588
well, that's just dumb
>500kg track car outperforms a 1500kg car
colour me surprised.

>>15227579
1/10 bait for making me reply

File: 1449801240883.png (302KB, 702x1005px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 702x1005px

>>15227604
>damage control

>>15227617
whew you controlled the damage there right before it got critical
good work lad

File: nw.png (193KB, 295x329px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 295x329px

>>15227680
>literal assmad the viper is slower

>>15227692
dude
come on
of course it's slower
and a bike is also much, much faster than a viper
what's the argument there?
a 1000hp truck is also slower than a viper
but benchracing is for faggots
but whatever, you win
you're a cool and big guy

File: BMW M12-13.jpg (1MB, 3072x2304px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3072x2304px

>>15227021
Most powerful F1 engine ever says you're wrong

>>15228340
>bikes
>turning
no

>>15228969
Most blown up F1 engine would be more factual.

Nice mpgs there buddy! Hopefully a full tank lasts to the next kfc.

File: Sprint 3.jpg (41KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x450px

>Not owning a 3 cyl. Turbo
>Not getting glorious 45 mpgs
BTFO

>>15229109
DOHC A BEST
OHV A SHIT

>>15229227
COULD HEAR YOU OVER MY RPM LIMIT

File: image.png (251KB, 731x548px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 731x548px

>>15227435
>six cylinder rotary
>six cylinder
>cylinder
>rotary

>>15229254
5K IS FAR ENOUGH
DONT NEED NO BENT PUSHRODS

>>15227080
Agreed.
But why dont we have more cars with straight fives? They have been thoroughly proven as excellent engines so why arent they used?

>>15229362
Inline fours are smaller and get better empeegees, not to mention the inherent balance issues with an i5. By the time you can make an i5 fit, a V6 will fit as well and we all know more cylinders = better in the mind of the general public.

>>15229362
manufacturers didnt like making amazing engines, so they stopped.
iirc audi still does an i5

>>15227021
But, Anon, what about an inline 6?

File: 1452080853741.jpg (40KB, 400x402px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x402px

>>15229109
>2016
>caring about fuel economy
either youre a poorfag or youre a dumb hippie nigger who cares about burning a little less dinosaurs than everyone else

>>15229263
It took 4 replies to notice this.

>>15229064
sportbikes turn much better than your corolla

they are cheaper too

>b-but muh f1 i will never own

top kek

>>15227021
>Below
>Wat
If I stack a v8 on another v8, will that make v8s worse than v8s?

>>15227046
>6*3 layout.
That's like a small block V18 (eighteen).

>>15227046
do you like inevitable engine heat death?

>>15227443
true but those multi cylinder roatary engines are maintenance nightmares

>>15227443

at the cost of cylinder wear.. imagine those piston rings in that rotary and those main crankshaft bearings with how long that engine is

>>15227541
>>15227579
that flat v8 though

>>15229263
memes son

>>15227021
>implying any combustion engine is of a desirable quality and not a well outdated and overly polluting piece of technology

>>15232016
This. Hail Tesla.

>>15232019
I have not looked into Tesla motors much. Don't they run on power plugs? How far does a charge take a car?

>>15232016
>>15232019
>/o/- Auto

>>15232118
>implying Tesla isn't the future of motoring

>>15232125
Tesla makes batteries not cars.

>>15232133
Tesla makes the most technologically advanced cars on the market today. This is a fact.

>>15227045
>10-wide car with 12-wide bumpers
That's way too big to scale nicely! The beltline alone is as tall as a minifig!

>>15232125
Fuck off batterycarfag. Go hardwire a Tesla battery to your dildo, faggot

>>15232144
Enjoy your obsolete technology while it lasts, luddite.

File: 1465102869689.jpg (10KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 250x250px

>>15232139
>implying that isn't McLaren

>>15232147
Can a McLaren drive itself?

>>15232146
Luddites have more fun. I'll enjoy having emotionally charged, octane fueled braps and you can have your sterile, pollen filtered, k cup dispensing, drive mode selecting, appliance operation experience, 200 pussyfooted miles at a time.

File: image.jpg (35KB, 450x453px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 450x453px

>>15227079
All I gather from this is that the Z06 would be more fun to drive. It's pulling consistently better G through the corners. Also that ~1 second deviation could be because that corvette scrubbed too much speed off for that last corner and got on the accelerator too early.

>>15232174
GT-R is faster
Corvette can't compete
GM BTFO!

>>15232152
>implying car driving itself is the pinnacle of automotive technology

That's a driver assistance tech that doesn't improve the over all capabilities of the car. That's like saying an ls600 is the best car ever back then because it parked and stopped itself, and also had radar cruise with lane keeping.

>>15232181
Nobody is saying the automotive technology makes cars better. The tech is better. Technically speaking, Tesla cars are the most advanced vehicles on the market. What we're saying here is that v8's are for people who sell 89 mustangs on Craigslist for 20k because its painted in a "rare" baby shit green. And that subarus are a best

Personally prefer my V12

>>15232211
Excuse me, but refute my point and pretend I said the that's like saying the ls600 was the most technologically advanced car ever because it had a bunch of driver assist tech. McLaren p1 is the literal state of the art of the automobile and you're going to tell me the Tesla is of a higher tier because it will hold its lane hands free and keep up with/not crash into the car in front of it? Infinitis were doing that with the adevent of the q45 early 2000s correct?

File: 02e891b0054d2bb2b632c326ba1f6a33.jpg (16KB, 236x354px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 236x354px

>>15231209

>>15227021
>tfw you scratch your head in confusion at how ford managed to make a V8 with only 200hp

File: 1998-2002_Mercury_Grand_Marquis_--_09-27-2010_1.jpg (1MB, 1988x1034px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1988x1034px

>>15233864

File: 1463710986629.png (87KB, 268x325px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 268x325px

>>15233864
>yfw when you wanted to strangle the fucking GM board member that greenlit the 140hp/220lbft 305 for the G-Body

File: IMAG0188.jpg (4MB, 4672x2624px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4672x2624px

>>15229109
>3 cyl
My nigga

>>15227021
Having fewer than 12 cylinders is for plebs now take your poor excuse of a Mexican boat anchor and get a decent job so you can afford a real engine.

File: F6-engine1-625x361.jpg (82KB, 625x361px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 625x361px

>>15227021
Lolk