BMW BTFO

File: Mercedes-Benz-A45-AMG-2016.jpg (143KB, 1140x643px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1140x643px

A45 AMG is faster than both t.b.h

>>15035930
Its what happen when you go soft and cater to mommies who wouldnt know what to do with oversteer.

>>15035930
>anymore
they never did
BMW has never known what its suppose to be
>owners will say its a sports car
But its classified as luxury
>luxury car
interior is more poorly built than 90s GM
>family car
less useful and broken more than most other cars
Although ford is fucking terrible too
And the RS is a joke

File: gawdmusheen.jpg (705KB, 1280x782px) Image search: [Google]

705KB, 1280x782px

>>15035966
>ford is fucking terrible
>implying Ford is not GOAT

>>15035977
Just about anything they have that isnt V8 is made or was made by another company.
Just about all of their cars is or was designed by another company
Hell even the RS is a volvo chassis and a mazda engine.
The Mustang turbo is a Mazda engine as well
Ford is a fucking joke of a company and has been since it started.
The RS is just to gain hype to boost sales.
Have you ever seen a ford commercial? Those are a joke too. Purposefully designed to lure in weak minded fools.

>>15036001
>cant read
i dont like BMW either

File: godmachine.jpg (375KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1920x1280px

>>15036001
I can't wait for your delicious tears when Ford absolutely dominates Le Mans

File: f056465cb8a29fab9e796f73a543d6a0.jpg (34KB, 736x601px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 736x601px

yeah, but here's the thing OP :

the BMW will always hold its resale value better than the focus, or the camaro, or anything else that you benchracers keep comparing the 1 series and the m2/m4 with.

:)

File: M4_3-4-front_A4.jpg (524KB, 1000x623px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 1000x623px

>>15036517
now, compare a limited edition BMW like the GTS and DTM with the mustang instead of comparing their normal cars with limited edition ones :^)

File: Screenshot_2016-05-10-00-49-17.png (328KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1080x1920px

>>15036012
The gt is doing so well already...

>>15035930
What is: the M6?

>>15036608
shit

>>15036508
>poverty spec non M series BMW
>holding its value

lel

File: ford bmw.png (648KB, 1362x665px) Image search: [Google]

648KB, 1362x665px

>superior German engineering

>>15035977
Spess Mehreen: The Car

>>15036718
>mpg
Why does BMW struggle with lower displacement?

>>15036718

and unfortunately the Coyote 5.0 will probably be taxed more in Europe than the BMW even though it gets better fuel economy because of its displacement.

File: stang.png (225KB, 975x734px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 975x734px

>>15036993
>emissions-based taxes

>>15036883
less torques mean you has to rev higher and use shorter gears ?

File: M.png (167KB, 968x437px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 968x437px

>>15036999
But then again, this is all in an irrelevant market anyway.

>>15035977
ford is only the goat of USA, which puts it near the back of the rest of the world's brands

>>15035930
>tested 0-62 slower than claimed
get someone who knows how to drive first, then ill think about taking a comparison like this seriously.

File: government-nox-results.jpg (121KB, 1012x815px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1012x815px

>>15037045
They are right at the top..... of fiddling emissions.

>>15036718
made up infographic with no sources. Typical BTFO Amerishill.

>>15037139
>wet track

>>15040087
>EPA estimates
2011 M3 with S65: 16/20 mpg (http://www.edmunds.com/bmw/m3/2011/sedan/features-specs/)
2013 Mustang GT: 15/26 mpg (http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2013/st-101421199/features-specs/)

>Anecdotal evidence
M3 with S65: ~16 mpg average (http://www.fuelly.com/car/bmw/m3?engineconfig_id=21&bodytype_id=&submodel_id=)
Mustang with 5.0: ~18.5 mpg average (http://www.fuelly.com/car/ford/mustang?engineconfig_id=6&bodytype_id=&submodel_id=)

>>15040342
B T F O
T
F
O

BMW a shit
a SHIT

>>15035930

A couple of seconds here and there makes absolutely no difference at all in the real world.

I would take a car with RWD and an I6 over an AWD 4 pot any day. BMW has a much better interior too, and I think it looks a lot better. Focus is very council.

>>15040342
>M3 with S65: 16/20
>20
>vs Mustang's 26
Does Bavaria not understand what 6th gear is for?

>>15035930
>being so fucking clueless you are impressed by a manufacturer fitting stiffer suspension to get faster track times

File: bmw-1-series-interior-10[1].jpg (85KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1024x683px

>>15040381
>BMW has a much better interior

>>15040410
Jesus, that's unironically, honest to goodness not much better than the Focus' 6 year old economy car interior

File: 2015-bmw-m135i-interior-images-02.jpg (541KB, 1600x1068px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 1600x1068px

>>15040410
>posting an old non-LCI, non-M135i interior
atleast post the proper one

>>15040448
Doesn't make that massive slab of plastic on top any less disgusting.

File: ford-focus-rs-interior.jpg (194KB, 1422x948px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1422x948px

>>15040459
>implying the rs is any better

>>15040459
fair enough but right now it only has to be better than the focus, and it is.

>>15040464
Never said the RS was good, just pointed out that the BMW is not "much better".

>>15040448
The Sport-Line with the aluminum and red contrast is the best color. And you can't see any difference on the interior between a M-sport 116i and a M135i. And if you go for the M-sport package, why not having the blue contrast instead of the shitty glossy one.

>>15040469
I never claimed it is "much better". But from sitting in a M135i and a Focus wagon i much prefer the M135i in every aspect.

>>15040482
The ugly steering wheel on the sport thingy though...

>>15040469
>he seriously thinks you can properly assess a car interior simply by looking at photographs

Who the hell would by an M 1 series in the first place. Competitior should be Gold R anyway.

>>15040514
*Golf R

>>15040514
I like how you're acting like the M135i isn't the best all rounder in the class.

>>15040410
>>15040448
Both of these are Ford-level hard plastic interiors. You can't argue that BMW makes good quality interiors. They haven't for years.

File: volkswagen-golf-r-interior-1[1].jpg (146KB, 1280x782px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1280x782px

>>15040533
literally VW-tier

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (482KB, 1918x1443px) Image search: [Google]

482KB, 1918x1443px

>>15040533
>i havent seen le current 5 series interior
>i havent seen le god-like g11 interior
tbf i think bmw makes the best interiors on the market,simple yet luxurious and comfy.also 1 series interior looks a lot, a lot better than focus.just look at that fucking interior lighting and tacky buttons and hideous vents.fuck.focus interior is damn hideous.
>inb4 a VW and BMW fanboy
>inb4 you can all polish my balls and serve me a milkshake

>>15035993
>being this upset and obvious success
Being you must suck!

>>15035977
U G L Y
G
L
Y

>>15040561
Even the 3 series has a really nice interior, if you pay for it.

>>15035943
>£45k
ROFL

>>15041411
BUTTMAD
U
T
M
A
D

>>15036570
What app is that?

>>15035977
Ford is best compared to the other 2 shitty americunt companies, they are irrelevant in the rest of the world.

>>15041596
>implying the rest of the world is relevant

>>15041610
rather be irrelevant and peaceful than relevant and having muslims crash airliners into out skycrappers

>>15040514
>buying a car with a 297hp transverse 4-cyl turbo engine and Haldex """""""""""""""""""4WD""""""""""""""""""" layout over a car with 326hp inverse 6-cyl turbo engine and RWD layout
You are the faggot.