/o/ please help me. i finally have a decent job. my car budget

Get a fucking P71 with low miles for like 6k or something
Swap in a 'stang manual
There, you're an American, fuck you and your empeegees, you can afford it.

>>14910708
no swaps, i dont wanna deal with that shit. fine fuck the mpgs what else can you suggest?

>>14910723
Have you by chance overlooked the sticky?

>>14910736
yeah, but all it really recomends there are vetts and some other ricey stuff. i cant seem to find anything like that around here. although there is a 300zx with 35k miles for 10 grand, showroom condition. but the engine has a sewing machine like tick to it

>>14910749


IS350 manual?

>>14910749
https://newlondon.craigslist.org/search/cta?sort=priceasc&auto_drivetrain=2&auto_transmission=1&max_auto_miles=60000&min_price=500&nearbyArea=168&nearbyArea=240&nearbyArea=250&nearbyArea=378&nearbyArea=38&nearbyArea=44&searchNearby=2

That Porsche doesn't look too bad. Neither does that Acura.

>>14910774
Doesn't exist, only is250s.

>>14910774
>IS350
none withing 100 miles of my according to auto trader :(
>>14910787
isnt that alot of miles though? 200k seems a bit much

>>14910798
yes of course it is a lot of miles
fucking hell, i set it to filter out anyone over 60000
these niggers and putting in three letters for their odo readings

OP here i dont know if im autistic but i always figured i could get something decent for 10k+

>>14910811
kek, yeah im retarded. shoulda figured

2005-2006 Pontiac GTO

>>14910820
go for the pontiac fiero
mpgs, fast, rwd, manual, all there, plus midengine and pop up headlights
3k seems like a good price for something with a few optical issues

>>14910827
i see some good ones. anything in particular to be wary of?
>>14910846 id prefer to actually spend around 10-15k and have somethings nice

>>14910862
b-but this is nice
what more do you want? ass massage seats?

>>14910827
https://newlondon.craigslist.org/search/cta?sort=priceasc&auto_drivetrain=2&auto_transmission=1&max_auto_miles=60000&min_price=50&nearbyArea=168&nearbyArea=240&nearbyArea=250&nearbyArea=378&nearbyArea=38&nearbyArea=44&searchNearby=2

>>14910869
i agree they are nice, but not for my daily, friend

V6 '11-'12 Mustang.

>300+hp
>30mpg hwy
>RWD
>manual

>>14910886
there must be another way

hi OP. i'm in a similar boat, but i live in socal.

have you considered looking at any traditional meme-mobiles? in particular, the 86 twins and the s2000. both of those can be driven reasonably efficiently, and if i can find both with less than 60,000 miles for less than 15k in socal, surely you can do as well in connecticut.

>>14910946
s2000 isnt a bad option. whats maintanence like on these. i apolagize for knowing so little.

as for the 86 twins, they were my origional plan but everyone keeps telling me ill regret it

>>14910986
they're telling you that because they're underpowered. you'll only regret it if you want something faster. you'll never know unless you go try it, man.

maintenance on an s2000? depends on the previous owner(s). many/most are thrashed. in my area, they hold value like lancer evos. your best bet is to find one that isn't modified to shit and has been properly maintained.

>>14911006
ill go test drive one and see. im kind of a brat about power. i see a few s2000's ill probably see how low a mileage one i can find in my price range

what is the verdict on the chrysler crossfire?

>>14910892
If you want the slower competitor you could get a '10+ V6 Camaro if you're into that whole much car is a Transformer crowd.

>>14911034 i would just get the gt or ss tbqhfam

1999 - 2004 Cobra, bullet proof motor, 25mpg if you drive like a granny.

03-04' is supercharged, 99-01' makes about 360 to the crank with basic bolt ons.

>>14911062
good good good

Early 2000's m3.