Typical engine owner types

>>14905806
i drive a 4 banger and i'm not cool

Australian shitposters are on fire tonight

>one thread says v8's are superior
>this says 4 cylinder cars are for cool people

This is why people who are getting into cars should stay off of this board.

>>14905806
>i6
>grandmas
Really, you see a lot of older women driving 335is?

What about V10, V12, W16, etc.?

File: Honeyview_20160320_150657.jpg (74KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x360px

I am a fat redneck

i'd rather have 1 giant cylinder than 6 tiny ones

>>14905806
Where does H4 and H6 fall?

>>14906079
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ygyk_eCMGzU

File: 1460233353362.png (106KB, 350x319px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 350x319px

>>14905806
>v8
>bad
Doesn't have to rev to 9k rpm to make peak horse power which on average is about 160hp
KEK!

>>14906082
If Subaru, raging homosexual.
If VW, moustachioed hipster.
If Porsche, gentleman racer.
If Lycoming, nigga you got a plane.

>>14905806
>I4
Soccer moms and normies. Pretty much all base model cars/CUVs/SUVs are 4 bangers these days.

>>14906109
>>14906109
Implying being any of these is a bad thing, Fuck I wish I had a mustachio!

>>14906044
>V10
Borderline-to-entry level exotic.

>V12
Legit exotic or super luxury

>W16
Bugatti

No love for flat4 boiracers?

File: oglaf-comics-curse-1156995.jpg (169KB, 760x596px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 760x596px

>>14905865
k

I just traded my V8 for a fourbanger.
8mpg vs 27mpg, the choice was easy, even though my new car is a money pit :^(

>>14905806
I own an I3 and a rotary. Where's that put me?

>>14905859
95% of us ausfags are bogans drooling over any v8 we can find. Don't be blaming us for this shitposting

>>14906571
women want that v8 ls1/small block chevy
I dont understand it.
I am buying one just to mod it. for some reason my 2L shitbox doesnt get them wet.

>>14905806
her tits are literally her only redeeming quality.

File: 1458714148607.gif (325KB, 157x178px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 157x178px

>i6
>grandmas and soccer moms

So basically 4 banger = poorfag car normie

Its true

>>14905806
t. Honda "enthusiast"

File: unedited2.jpg (75KB, 1090x614px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1090x614px

>>14906062
so am i, apparently

Only people who actually care about cars own straight sixes, because disposable cars haven't been built with straight sixes in several decades now.

>>14906921
There is literally no advantage to having an inline 6 to having a V6

>>14906932
literally no advantage to owning a vehicle vs taking the bus

File: cars-chevrolet-epica-2016-276038.jpg (191KB, 1280x851px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1280x851px

>>14906921
Like fuck.
Ford Aus too has been pretty good at churning out disposable large sedans that still use an archaic six cylinder engine up until now.

>>14906937
Its ok anon. Not everybody can come up with counter arguments when someone points out your bullshit.

>>14906932
Better torque, inherent balance for lower weight.

>>14906954
>Better torque
[citation needed]
>inherent balance
redundant these days
>lower weight
[citation needed]

>>14906950
considering most buses implement v configurations because torque, i'd say it's quite relevant

>>14906954
>better torque
From where does that comes from
>inherent balance
The one found in most V-type engines?
>lower weight
Literally the opposite, the V config makes engine take less space and be lighter.

Oh, and Since V engines have a smaller crankshaft than inlines, they are usually able to run on higher RPM, and since the camshafts are also smaller, not only they can run at higher RPM but also they can transfer movement from one end to the other quicker.

No shit almost no modern sport/race car uses inlines anymore. If V4 could be any more reliable they sure as fucking hell would replace the inline 4.

>>14906958
Balance isn't redundant at all. The only reason the V6 can retain its is because of heavy balance shafts.

>>14906962
>most buses implement v configurations
Are you being paid to act stupid on the internet?

>>14906973
And yet they're still an alround lighter package that's more compact leading itself to a more favourable moment of inertia.
>inb4 S54 shortblock weight vs. fully dressed c32a

>>14905806
what about Diesel i5s?

>>14906981
As if, there's a reason Benz is reintroducing the i6 this year.

>>14905806
Is it safe to say I6 is reserved for german master race engineers and jap turbo destroyer of worlds enginemaking

>>14907002
Of course there is. They are cucks.

>WE NEED SOMETHING SMALLER THAN A V8 BUT WE DONT WANT TO MAKE MORE i-4 CARS!
>- HOW ABOUT WE USE V6?
> FUCK YOU THAT'S NOT TRADITIONAL NOR EUROPEAN ENOUGH WE ARE USING THE SAME ENGINE TYPE THAT WE USED 40 YEARS AGO!

>>14907011
>turbo destroyers
Anything with a turbo is fucking quick.

3.0 Supra engine i think made 220 hp N/A.

NSX made almost 270 HP N/a and that i think was a 2.9 V6

If a V6 and Inline 6 have similar displacement and almost identical things like compression, ignition timing, etc. Its no surprise that the V6 ends up with better power

>>14907017
Huh what? Are you dumb or something? Since the end of the 90's Benz has been making bucketfuls of V6 and V8 engines. Hell, even gone all the way up to V12. It seems all the balance shafts are getting on their nerves though.

File: 1456155494001.jpg (23KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 499x499px

This V6 fanboy is going all out, isn't he?

>>14907023
Well balance shafts aren't reliable and they steal power so

>>14907023
The reason they're returning to the I6 is economy though because it can share the majority of its parts with an I4, unlike a V6, making it cheaper to manufacture.

>>14907029
I still haven't heard a reason why inline 6 are better, but that's ok, anon, i dont need you to use your brain anyways

>>14907002
When you're talking about a company that's happily hamstrung itself with 90 degree V6s for the last two decades, I don't think it counts.
>there's a reason Benz is reintroducing the i6 this year.
Perhaps you would care to cite it?
>inb4 Mercedes marketing spiel

File: 4.0 Liters inline 6 JEEP.jpg (102KB, 1024x933px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1024x933px

>>14906958
you dont know shit about engines, get fucked

>>14906973
this man is right

>>14906981
>short
they are short, thats the only reason why they are built. V6 suck.

>>14907002
fuck yeah BENZ

>>14907011
no its not, the 4.0L i6 that was built into many many jeeps was a glorious engine, pic very related

>>14907017
>c u c k s
lol, thats just classic for someone who doesnt know what to say anymore. get fucked and take your shitty V6 with you, V6's are a compromise made because REAL engines dont fit in small cars.

File: salty.jpg (151KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 500x500px

>>14907029
Nice projecting

V6 are superior to Inline sixes
Formula 1 lol

>>14907045
Straight six inherently balanced in primary and secondary, simple design, shares parts with i4, lighter, better fuel economy and less complicated than V6 because no spinning balance shafts etc. you know all of these reasons already, you're just low effort trolling on a caucasion yak milk distillery plank

>>14907048
WOW ANON THOSE ARGUMENTS SURE PROVED ME WRONG. NOW I AM CONVINCED THE INLINE 6 ITS A BETTER ENGINE WITH YOUR LOGICAL ARGUMENTS

>>14907056
>Straight six inherently balanced in primary and secondary
Only true fact.
>simple design
But that's not an advantage.
>shares parts with i4
Not a giantic advantage
>lighter
Not true.
>better fuel economy
What in the fuck.......
> less complicated than V6 because no spinning balance shafts
But inlines also have balance shafts

>>14907059
if you knew anything about engins you would know that v6 engines are only being produced to fit into smaller cars. you need a heavy as shit balance shaft, and they respond way slower because of bigger moving masses. v6 is and always was a compromise, fucking deal with it, and if you dont believe me, grad a book and learn how an engine works.

>>14907066
Not inline sixes. Inline fours and threes (or fives if you're swedish) because they don't have balance. Six cylinder is the self balancing sweetspot for fourstrokes. If it was a twostroke it'd be three cylinder inline.

>>14907071
I am a fucking mechanic, but its ok, i am sure you can convince everyone in japan that you are right and that an engine type that hasn't been made for years is still better.

>>14907072
k. But i still dont see it as a big disadvantage, unless i am missing something about the balance shafts?

>>14907074
>im a fucking mechanic
and i graduated in mechanical engineering and work in engine developement. you people are mostly talentless hacks, i know enough mechanics.

>>14907048
>you dont know shit about engines, get fucked
As the person who offers no substance in any of the 6 replies posted in your post, keep calling that kettle black.
>>14907056
>shares parts
Shares manufacturing tooling*, same way Mercedes was using a 90 degree V6 for so long, same production tooling as the V8.
Other than that, your other claims are simply redundant buzzwords and fallacies as mentioned before, with no real advantage.

When has l6 ever been used in mid engine applications? Enjoy your long heavy l6 boat anchor that hangs over the front axle.

>>14907082
Doesn't looks like

>>14907082
Not the same guy but I'll be sure to stick a used condom over your valve retainer when you come in for service

>>14907096
i have my car fixed by a coworker who has a hobby shop, i wouldnt let you butchers touch it.

but thanks for confirming mechanics are retarded manchildren with no respect for cars.

>>14907100
Wow dude you sure are mad right now.

>>14907077
Basically the balance shafts are fuck heavy and add spinning weight to the engine because they HAVE to or it'd shake itself apart in short order because certain forces that the badly sequenced detonations generate. It's too complicated to put into text when there's a billion YT videos on the topic, so maybe have a look-see some time.

Maybe think of this, most engines used in cars until a good bit after the second world war were inline sixes. Even during the war, the big engines were V12, which is two i6 joined at the crank, and the smaller ones were inline sixes. Why? Because all the balancing flubdubbery wasn't even invented yet. Anything built without balance shafts ended up rattling itself to death much faster than the already well established i6es.

File: Lamborghini.jpg (41KB, 640x425px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 640x425px

>>14906327
>Borderline exotic

File: HzdmsN.jpg (331KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1024x682px

>>14907086
BMW M1.

>>14907100
I treat everyone's car with respect, even Volkswagens. Just don't expect for nothing to break on it 2 months later. Oh I might shit in the cabin filter so you get that musky nutty smell

>>14907121
>I treat everyone's car with respect
>I might shit in the cabin filter

lol mechanics

File: Chrysler_multibank.jpg (1MB, 2498x2493px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2498x2493px

>>14907106
>>14907077
Hell, look at this fucking thing bet you never seen anyhing like it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysler_A57_multibank
>five Chrysler 250.6 cu in (4.1 L) (bore 3.4375 in or 87 mm, stroke 4.5 in or 114 mm)[1] L-head inline six cylinder engines were arranged around a central shaft, producing a unique 30-cylinder 21-litre (1,253 cu in)[1] engine in a relatively compact but heavy package.
This is essentially the precursor to W-engines, except kludged together from spare parts. And all the spare parts were i6es. This was the main powerplant for the Sherman tank mass production.

>>14907106
So its basically something alike the need for a heavy flywheel. And what makes you think that balance shafts didn't got evolved and light enough for people to start using V6 instead?

>>14907133
Because the fucking definition of balance shaft is that it needs to be heavy. If you make it light it doesn't work anymore.

>>14907131
ok. But how does that proves anything about the i6?

File: witness me mad max nux v8.gif (2MB, 245x225px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x225px

The best engine is an i3. Twostroke. Lightest of all, perfectly balanced, unlimited power, no wasted movements, no balance shafts, super compact. The only challenge is emissions testing, and if you turbo and direct inject it and give it sump greasing like any other engine that ain't an issue anymore either.

Newsflash: Honda registered a patent for a new kind of DI twostroke last year. I am awaited.

i really really like i6 engines

My previous car was a V6, and I much preferred it to the i4 that's in my car now. Grandmas and soccer moms know.

I6 engines are trash
Muh 2jz muh rb26, heavy iron boat anchors.. very great.. not
Muh unkillable 100hp jeep 4.0s. .. dog shit
Muh bmw heritage, just roflmao
Only good l6 is the ford Barra, and it's only good for making properly big numbers (not just a peak figure like jz/rb dyno queen shit) with little effort

Vr38dett kicks the shit out of any l6

>>14907176
you having a stroke, gramps?

>>14907178
No. He is just using his brain. You could try that too

>>14905806
I drive a fast 4 cylinder car and I'm not cool.

File: truck-hauling-heavy-load-uphill-in-canada_wydg9kheb__D.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>14907176
>completely forgetting about commercial diesels
They're almost exclusively I6.

>>14906567
On a motorcycle and in a Mazda

File: OM501LA [Actros 2646].jpg (22KB, 300x301px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x301px

>>14907225
And yet, ironically one of the smoothest highway trucks that can still be bought today uses a V6.

>>14907231
of course, look at how fucking short euro trucks have to be you degenerate faggot

>>14907235
Not that it has anything to do with anything, but;
>Euro cabovers can't fit big engines
You couldn't be any more incorrect.

>>14907241
are you fucking blind, nigga. of course they use a compact V6 instead of a long and thinner i6 in a eurotruck. its a pure size thing, nothing else.

I have an i5


>fuckin' fags lol

>>14907254
i also have an i5
what i5 do you have?

>>14907230
I don't own a motorcycle.

>>14907258
4690k

>>14907300
no match for my OM602

>>14907291
Three cylinder Corsa? Go die lol

File: DSC_0114.jpg (1MB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1440px

>>14907314
Nope.

File: volvo-d16-02.jpg (25KB, 350x281px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 350x281px

>>14907247
Again, well done ignoring "one of the smoothest highway trucks that can still be bought today uses a V6", and then going off on a completely different tangent, and still be incorrect.

>>14907176
>comparing a twin turbo v6 used in a Nissan GT-R to an engine used in a Bavarian sedan

Kill yourself

>>14906719
>implying she would even look twice at your faggot ass

>>14907371
I would rather she didn't.

>>14907330
>volvo doing it right
>again

>>14907385
are you nuts? she has by far the best body in porn
yeah of course her face is a little messed up but its kinda cute in a way if you ask me.

File: 1459249173902.png (433KB, 531x519px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 531x519px

>>14905806
>i4
>16-40+ men

What the fuck does that even mean cunt, anyone over 14?????

File: commie tears.jpg (18KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x480px

>>14907176
nou're not even trying at this point, are you?

>>14905806
what about qt I3 engines?

>>14907436
>she has by far the best body in porn
you have some really fucking shit taste, friend. but you're entitled to like what you like, so that's okay.

File: 08e456829afd750f1724bc0fe047023e-d77kvfi.png (113KB, 420x264px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 420x264px

>>14905806
>economy 4 banger
>cool
pick one

>>14907490
oh come on what body looks better than hers.

File: holdinglaugh.gif (3MB, 286x258px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 286x258px

>>14907111
The guy doesnt even answer back

>>14906719
She needs about 10-15lbs on her. Her hips look like she just walked out of Auschwitz.

File: FD miku.jpg (583KB, 1200x725px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 1200x725px

>I6

YOU FUCKING KEK

File: 1412584673962-1.jpg (10KB, 255x255px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 255x255px

>>14905806
>I work on a farm with a v8 truck.
Fuck you too anon.

File: 1366505270006[2].jpg (23KB, 446x362px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 446x362px

>>14907674
>you will never shoot a massive load on her face

File: vr6 1.jpg (51KB, 719x539px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 719x539px

I have a VR6 12 valve.

It's basically a straight six that has been squished lengthwise.

>>14906921
>new BMWs
>not disposable

File: 005.jpg (103KB, 1200x1088px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1200x1088px

>>14905806
this is like posting, "only cool people shit their pants daily"

File: image.jpg (41KB, 257x279px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 257x279px

>>14905806
I'm not sure grandma or a soccer mom could drive a 552 cubic inch turbo V6

ITT: OP trying to justify his shitty econobox

File: image.jpg (63KB, 440x330px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 440x330px

What about V12?
14L/852 cubic inch
Two Stroke

>>14907522
Who is she?

>>14905806
Who's the butterface?

>>14905806
I got herpes and HPV from looking at this picture.

>>14906932
That's why a i6 is competing with v8 because there is no advantage to the i6.
>Cummins vs power stroke vs duramax

>>14905806
You forgot that flat fours are owned by vaping retards and wankels are owned by wankers and flat sixes are owned by dentists and v4s are owned by hippies and fucking weirdos and i3s are owned by poor european peasants unless its a bike and then they are rad.

>>14908072
Yes. That's why there hasn't been a single sport-tier car made with the inline 6 ever since the R34. That's why most touring cars or lemans cars are either V6 or V8 or Flat 6

>>14908043
what's the power output

>>14905806
What about inline 5s?

>>14908055
amy reid

File: IMG_20160417_130044.jpg (833KB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 2448x2448px

>>14905865
The v8 thread lists reasons and facts, this one does not

>>14909420
Around
450 BHP @ 2100 RPM
1200 lb. ft. @ 1600 RPM

>>14908063
I'm sure STDs should be the least of your worries.

File: row_3634_720.jpg (301KB, 1959x1102px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1959x1102px

>>14905806
OP can't afford to buy or maintain anything with more than 4 cylinders.

>>14905806
BUT
HER
FACE

Goddamn OP you should photoshop a bag over that.

fucking Australia shitposters, the fuck do you cunts love jap v4 so much. you cuts use to be cool

>>14907522
Like every body?

>>14906571
Canada then? Flags on /o/ would be nice.

File: 1459006783677.jpg (51KB, 555x344px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 555x344px

>>14905806
Hows that 1.2L Clio, britbong?

V12>V8>I6>V6>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I4>>>>>>>>V4

File: amy.jpg (404KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1920x1080px

>>14909546
She doesn't have a bad face.
>implying you wouldn't bust within a minute

>>14909994

Not as bad as I thought but not my cup of tea. But yeah her body makes up for it nicely.

>>14909994
She's a butterface.

Body is like 8/9, face is a solid 5

>>14909994
face looks bad from almost all angles

>>14909925
>implying i6 > V6
>implying V4 is bad

>>14910099
>>14910133
>either has no gf or sekt tier water retainer gf

>>14905859
This is not ausfag shitposting, aussies love V8's

>>14910253
No, I'm just realistic. Her body is great, her face is average. "5" is average, you nitwit. Only vapid, desperate morons white knight this hard. Honest people don't rate every halfway attractive person they see as a perfect 10.

I have a 5 face and a 7/8 body since I am fit. There's no shame in being average in some way, most people are, and most people who think they aren't average are too.

>>14907176
>The Cummins 6BT 12 valve doesnt exist

O I am laffin.

V6 has no redeeming qualities. just get an i6 or a v8

>>14910306
>V6 has no redeeming qualities
>Except being able to rev higher, being lighter, taking less space, which is why it is used in all 6 cylinder sport or racing cars (as long as its not Flat 6) and having a lower center of gravity than inline 6, yeah, sure, it has no redeeming qualities.

File: plepsl.gif (1MB, 350x272px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 350x272px

>>14910321
If you are using it for sport/race just get a fucking flat 6.

Everything else get an i6

>Tfw can crawl up the side of a mountain with trailer in tow at idle
>mfw v6 fags

>>14910332
Oh well anon, i am sure i6 has proven itself nowadays as superior to V6! After all every sport/race car that uses 6cyls is obviously i6! Did you heard? The R35 GTR was actually a N/A i6 in disguise of a V6 TT!

ALL HAIL INLINE 6

File: what am I reading.jpg (115KB, 500x410px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 500x410px

>>14910366
>you
>reading comprehension

I said for sport/racing, go for the flat six.

for everything BESIDES sport/racing, go for the i6.

I said it right in my post, but here you come back saying "look at dese sports cars! they dont use i6! look at this fast v6 car!" I SPECIFICALLY made a distinction.

further proof v6 fags have an iq lower than their mpg

>>14905806

>4 cylinder
>Not de-facto economy car power
>Not the engine of choice for people who don't care about their vehicle
>Not the lowest tier engine choice in any number of vehicles

>>14907146
Will this BTFO the Ford Fiesta ecoboost? Will Honda come out with a nice compact car that is a successor to old Honda Civics or dare I say the CRX?

>>14910332
>If you are using it for sport/race just get a fucking Porsche
lol. Unless you're talking about that bland boring H6 Subaru that gets you from A to B with little fuss.

>corolla s
>accord sport
4 cylinder engines tuned entirely for economy in 4 door cars that have chrome everything, skirts, and a wing

>>14910321
>rev higher,
Bullshit.

>>14910956
This tbqh.
It's as ludicrous as claiming I6 produces more torque than an otherwise equal V6.

>>14905806
I love my 4liter straight 6 though anon, shit'll probably outlive me.

>>14905806
Who is the butterfaced semen demon

>>14909413
>Yes. That's why there hasn't been a single sport-tier car made with the inline 6 ever since the R34
??????????

E46 M3?

>>14907327

wat is this

>>14911289
Suzuki Cappuccino

>>14911103

It was posted earlier anon.

>>14911308
Read through thread, no name mentioned

>>14907048
reverse flow head ruins it

File: 1347744795501.jpg (9KB, 251x235px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 251x235px

>>14911321

Here's a hint. It was repeating digits.

>>14905806
>I'm a 12 year old that just watched Tokyo drift. the post

>>14907146
oh no, the turbo 2 stroke fallacy again

>>14907021
New Honda 1.5L are making about 200HP.

What the fuck happened?

>>14909994
BON QUI QUI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZkdcYlOn5M

>>14910380
Wow anons those arguments sure convinced me!

File: lead_large.png (248KB, 615x447px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 615x447px

>>14910956
>>14910980
>smaller crankshaft means being able to withstand higher RPM before breaking down

>This is one of the reasons why the bigger the engine usually the lower the redline and the opposite with smaller engines

File: WP_20140610_011.jpg (2MB, 3552x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3552x2000px

This vshape is more compact, and complex than an inline. vshape is used more in racing and fwd because it's size. Not because balance shafts and weight

>>14911897
>engine payout with more lateral motion able to rev higher
Yeah nah

>>14913818
Right, so that's why things like a 7.0 V8 has such a high redline like 5k RPM while a 1.0 has such a low RPM limit as 9k+RPM.

The smaller the engine, the faster the components can rotate before breaking

>>14905827
Same, senpai.

>>14915867

Not him, but what is more important is stroke vs bore.

Short stroke makes high RPM, not displacement. Unless you want to get into resonance frequency and lengths of crankshafts vs RPM.

>>14907305
no match for my ABY

File: 37.jpg (29KB, 487x503px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 487x503px

SOHC, 90-degree, iron block, alloy head, V6 Master Race reporting in

3.7l powertech - 300,000 miles and no major hick ups

>>14907522
she looks like a teenage boy with tits you virgin

>>14905806
V12 master race reporting in.

>>14911125
Don't forget the current-gen M3/M4.TT i6.

>caring about the image your car/engine bestows to this extent
faggots all

>>14905806
Do people like you just get an identity crisis when you see a Mercedes or BMW with a V8 or what?

File: fuckingjews.png (141KB, 439x290px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 439x290px

>>14907176
But my wrangler 04 wrangler in manual with 4.0 is awesome and better than cucked v6 ones of the mid 2000s

>>14905806
Yeah I have a turbo'd 4 banger and I'm a normie ass faggot. So much for your logic OP.

>>14906335
>Subaru Boxer 4
YEAH YEAH, STANCENATION! Yeah, i vape.

>VW Aircooled Boxer 4
Hitler did nothing wrong, untermensch.

>>14918321
>because I said so
Luckily, the rest of us don't follow your own personal uncitable encyclopedia of me.

>>14918541
But the TJ is the last real Jeep with creature comforts you dumb fag.

File: 1410212817168.jpg (35KB, 535x577px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 535x577px

> no i3 description

>>14918619
>But the TJ is the last real Jeep because I said so
And you're the one calling others fags. lol

im the most bogan person i know and i drive a i6 and i4

File: 2e947adb2a9e09527858b1d9d8b1ad5c2afeb1aba46bc68140fbab95b46e9497.jpg (53KB, 598x350px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 598x350px

>V8

>master engine.

makes highest amount of power and torque than any other type of production automotive engine Naturally aspirated.

add turbos to these, and you can make 800+ horsepower.


or

>>14918907
Doesn't even make sense

>>14916140
Too bad it sounds like absolute shit.

What does /o/ say about i3 owners

>>14919392
That's what I'm saying.

>>14919837
It's literally the last jeep in the lineup with the AMC stuff that makes jeep wranglers, jeep wranglers.

You're a retard to not understand the point being made.

It has the classic in line 6. You sit closer to the rear wheels than the front. It will roll over. It's not crash safe. It's a real jeep.

>>14905806
Stay in school kid.

>>14919878
You do realise there was a time before jeep was owned by AMC? Are these not real jeeps? By which definition do "real jeeps" have to be equipped with an arbitrary engine configuration first commissioned by an arbitrary parent company?
Pro-tip, your own definition doesn't count, retard.

>>14920215
Obviously real jeeps are the GMGP vehicles.

You are not using a real jeep if you dont ride in one, faggot.

>>14905806
There's no replacement for displacement faggggggg

File: 1431497262939.gif (818KB, 500x359px) Image search: [Google]

818KB, 500x359px

>>14905806
>v8
>fat rednecks
Damn straight.

Though one of my friends has coined the term Rednexican since I'm part Mexican.

Also, get fucked.

>>14906938
I actually own and drive an epica daily. It's surprisingly smooth.

I'd rather it than a Camry/other generic shitbox.

>>14921445
>I'd rather drive a Daewoo than a Camry
This is what you're literally saying.

>>14923789
Straight six with a five speed vs v6 auto slush box. The choice was easy.

File: SUBARU-Tribeca-612_13.jpg (777KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

777KB, 1920x1440px

>>14910332

This.