Cars like this?
>>14871911
Nice i didnt know this one, thanks
>>14871871
I got you
>>14871943
Could you name me some of them? i want to buy one and i have no idea about this
>>14871871
>ITT Tiny Cars
>>14871969
3rd gen supra, 3rd gen camaro, 300zx too name a few
>>14871871
>Cars like this
>>14871871
>>14871969
It's like you don't even /o/.
You make a thread with that pic and say something like "I bet you can't name all of these cars". Then you'll get 3 or 4 posts with the answer, followed by 70 or so posts bickering about different generations and trims.
>>14872167
Well i thought the people here were smarter than that and yeah i pretty much never use this board
>>14871943
>>14872112
Is that a picture of where you get your opinions?
>>14871943
>front engine
>comparable to a Ferrari
"No."
What you need to buy is a Lotus Esprit.
>>14875344
If you have a left leg and foot, the lotus esprit is not for you.
Just google esprit pedal box. 3 postage stamps in a space about 6 inches across TOPS. And no dead pedal. Even a brand new v8 Esprit for $40k couldn't make me do it...
>>14875368
>And no dead pedal.
Boo fucking hoo, you fucking faggot. There's an entire slab of floor in front of the pedals to put your lazy fucking foot on.
Behold
the fucking
glory
Bodykit on a Vette.
>>14875388
you are truly the god of gods, checked btw
>>14871871
>>14871911
They are nothing alike.
The Testarossa was a low point for Ferrari. They were unreliable and not competitive at racing. The Testarossa represents Ferrari using their brand name and prestige to sell cars rather than performance.
The Diablo was a high point for Lamborghini. With 100hp more than the Testarossa and optional AWD, the Diablo was the first Lamborghini that truly delivered the performance worthy of it's styling.
>>14878585
Testarossas are as much GT cars as sports cars, it wasn't developed as a race car
>>14875409
Is that a supra?
>>14872145
Ain't no 300ZX in that picture