ITT: People who don't deserve their car.

File: 1438505212901.jpg (27KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 540x540px

>>14861437

i'm of the opinion that if they bought the car with their own hard earned money, they can do whatever the fuck they want with it.

are those few removeable cardboard pieces really that bad, OP?

>>14861460
Well no, but they have sort of missed the point

>>14861460
>ducktaping shit to your paint
>Ducktaping cardboard to your "performance" car for better fuel mileage.

this triggers me.

>>14861465
>using fucking civic hatchback as a performance car is ok
>using s2000 as a commuter is terribly wrong
that's some women-tier logic

>>14861437
>>14861465
Didn't mommy and daddy pay for your S2K? If so, you're in no position to say who does or doesn't deserve their car.

>>14861437
is it because he's too poor for gas and tries to squeeze out every drop in efficiency?

File: historia_twingo_003.jpg (135KB, 1200x847px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1200x847px

>>14861539
REKT

>>14861465

>ducktaping

>>14861465
maybe he was going for the land speed record for "fastest faggot on four wheels"

also
>duck

>>14861539
>Didn't mommy and daddy pay for your S2K?
well they didn't, so by your logic, I am in a position to say who does or doesn't deserve their car?

File: ilx-large.jpg (31KB, 490x368px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 490x368px

>>14861605
>I am in a position to say who does or doesn't deserve their car
go away you fuckin' commie

File: FIXED.png (688KB, 771x400px) Image search: [Google]

688KB, 771x400px

>>14861437

It is really painfully wrong
here, I fixed it

>>14861507

Let me phrase it this way

>upgrading a car = good
>downgrading a car = bad

>>14861755
>improving aerodynamic efficiency = downgrading

>>14861437
God trip fags are the fucking worst on this board. The incarnation of insecurity.

>>14861755
a car =/= your car