>Having a V8 engine less than 5 liters.
yeah that gif really fits the situation
>Having a V6 engine less than 3 liters.
>not wanting to hoon around with a lightweight 1.8l V6 that spools up like a mad cunt
it's like you can smell the lard in this thread
>Not having a GDI
>>14810805
>>14810512
Stop using this picture
>>14810707
>not wanting to go on around in a proper non-poorfag sports car that's sound give YHWH an erection
Smells like VB and despair ITT
>>14810589
>tfw 2.9l straight 6
>>14810512
>having a v8 less than 7 liters
ftfy
>>14810512
>>14810589
>>14810707
>>14810818
>>14810826
>Measuring your engine displacement in liters instead of CID.
>>14810512
>what is formula 1
>having a 6 cylinder engine less than 4.5 liters
>having a 4 cylinder less than 6L
>>14810852
>using cuck-tier imperial measurements
>>14810904
>having pushrods
>>14810942
Pushrods push gods
>having cylinders
>>14810946
pushrod fangisl get their shit pushed in 2bh
>>14810512
>tfw Chevy 283
>Having less than 4L in a V6
>having an engine with less than 389 CID
>having an engine with the block not painted light blue
>not having chrome valve covers
>not having a tripower
>>14811007
that picture makes me feel very sad
>>14810512
>>Having a V8 engine less than 5 liters.
s-m-h
>>14810852
>calling it cid instead of cui
>>14811491
I don't have engine pics, but my dad's car has all that.
>not having at least 11 cylinders and over 50L
Reminder that "5.0" is codeword for 4.9
>>14810512
OP, everyone knows that the ideal displacement for a single cylinder is .5 liters. Why do you think there are so many 2L i4's and 3L i6/v6? Optimal efficency. I want a 4L V8 like a 1UZ
>>14811612
New 5.0 is 4951cc or so
>>14810512
>implying this doesn't sound good
https://youtu.be/10JJg8Xq2qc?t=18
>>14810512
>having more than 0.2L of N/A displacement per cylinder
7.8l Big Block V6 in a pickup. Im not certain how to feel about it.
>Having a straight 6 over 2 liters
Honestly if you need more than 2 liters to run 10's you're doing it incorrectly.
>>14810512
>having a 1uz
>knowing it's better than whatever boat anchor powerplant you have
feelsgoodman
>>14810707
>>14811638
>>14811791
I mean, I guess that kind of displacement is fine if you are the kind of guy that let's his girlfriend fuck black gentlemen on the weekends.
>>14811855
>he doesn't have a dedicated cuck shed
what are you, poor?
>>14811807
>tfw no GMC V6
>>14811848
>smaller in displacement
>still larger in physical dimensions
u mad
>>14811889
No, because it's an inherently better motor structurally
>>14811889
>no accessories on the ls
>>14811491
>having the wrong tripower
>not having a Rocket V8
>not having your engine painted the color of money and precious metal
>>14811819
>muh 10s
Sorry I like taking turns and I'd prefer not having 2L of turbo lag from a 500lb engine. I'll take 50%+ more displacement and reasonable power delivery for the same weight please.
>>14811924
>says Rocket on it
>isn't a rocket engine
>not having 71 cui/cylinder
>not having 12 of those cylinders
>not having twin turbos
>not being two stroke
>>14810904
>having a 12 cylinder engine less than 46L
>>14810512
>having cylinders
lol go back to the woods grandpa
>>14811933
>laggy
Just keep the revs up, grandma
>>14811866
>hoods up
Typical Fords
>>14810818
They are good
> not even having the power of flight in 2016
>>14810818
>mfw 4.9l inline 6
>>14811972
it's in a volvo though
>>14810512
Are you implying its good or bad? I can't tell. You should probably kill yourself.
Any one know of a site to get a good almost complete crate engine, or one you could pick and build.
>>14811952
>DRIFT CAR
>>14811819
Turbos effectively increase displacement
>>14812053
no, no they don't.
>>14811985
>you will never have a flying car
>you will never pull hektik drifts over the mountains in Japan
>>14812053
You mean volumetric efficiency?
>>14812059
So compressed air isn't functionally equivalent to more air..
Interesting..
>>14811952
>dyno plot in wheel speed, not RPM
>>14811924
But anon, blue is still better.
Well... Fuck.
>>14812079
see
>>14812073
>>14812083
9000 in 4th with a 4.6 diff
>>14812112
Sure, but compressing air means you're pumping more air through, which is the same result as increasing displacement.
>>14812132
Except you're not replacing it, because your turbocharged 2L is still going to make less than my turbocharged 3L
>>14812162
Uh, obviously
>>14812162
>my turbocharged two liter makes 400hp
>your turbocharged three liter makes 302hp
too many variables
>>14811924
>tfw have an oldsmobile v8
>tfw not the fast one
>>14812106
Mustangs on suicide watch, wagons do 5.0 better
>>14812175
Let's remove some variables to simplify it for you. Say my RB30 has the same compression ratio as your RB20. We both turbocharge our engines with comparable though respectively sized turbos and wind up in the same efficiency land of the map with the same intercooler efficiency. I make more power. You cannot replace displacement.
>>14810512
> Only having 8 cylinders...
>>14810512
>having a V8 engine less than 8 liters.
>having an engine
>>14812492
>rocket engine is not an engine
>>14812089
>single carb
Cuckold
>>14812506
Do you cuckmemers even know what the word memes? Or is it just your new way of calling someone a fag since you're afraid to say fag after joining your LGBTQ club for your tranny (you call them "trap" obsession.
>>14811962
>He has someone else do basic maintenance on his truck
What are you, a cuck? I'm sure you let your girlfriend have sex with other men on your bed.
>>14812212
> 2+1 < 3+1
Are yourretarded
>>14812506
At the time that engine was made, the Corvette was the only car GM allowed to have multiple carbs.
>>14810904
>flying shit tier planes
>>14812212
>Saab
5.3 and 6.6 reporting
> owning an engine that doesn't scavenge energy from its exhaust
V8 302 5L z/28
V8 305 5L Olds
Reporting
>>14813409
>302cid
>4948cc
That's not 5L friendo
>>14813057
Pontiac has tripower before the vette m8
not having a catch can
>>14810512
>living in the 1950s
>>14813336
>>14813409
5.7l reporting
>>14812068
There is actually such a thing as drifiting for airplanes, it's actually more of a glider move though and most commercial aircraft pilots don't even lift that hard to know it.
It's known as the "forward slip".
It was used to save this plane after it rain out of fuel midair due to metric/imperial conversion problems while refueling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider
>As the runway drew near, it became apparent that the aircraft was coming in too high and fast, raising the danger of running off the runway before it could be stopped. The lack of hydraulic pressure prevented flap/slat extension that would have, under normal landing conditions, reduced the stall speed of the aircraft and increased the lift coefficient of the wings to allow the aircraft to be slowed for a safe landing. The pilots briefly considered a 360-degree turn to reduce speed and altitude, but decided that they did not have enough altitude for the manoeuvre. Pearson decided to execute a forward slip to increase drag and lose altitude. This manoeuvre is commonly used with gliders and light aircraft to descend more quickly without increasing forward speed.
>yes, you read that right, midair drifting saved a passenger plane from flaming death
>>14810512
Crying himself to sleep after having his ass handed to him buy a mere 4cyl
>>14816516
>ran out of fuel because they were using metric instead of imperial
top jej
>>14810813
Died, thank you.
Opinion invalidated
>>14811911
Not seeing the water pump on the front of the ls.
>>14810512
>tfw 4.951L
>tfw when me dad had a 8.2 502 in his 69 RS
The absolute madman
Tfw forced induction
HE DOESN'T have a boxer
>>14812212
That's because you're just adding a turbo to something that already had more displacement in the first place. Do you know what the word "replace" means?