Can Dodge redesign the Challenger without killing it? This is

>>14809433
why should they redesign it? it looks fucking nice

File: 2015-dodge-challenger-rt-scat-pack-rear-end-in-motion-02jpg.jpg (2MB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2040x1360px

>>14809433
They dont have to. it looks fine the way it is

>>14809466
Because it's a 12 year old Mercedes?

File: 2004_mercedes-benz_c-class_4_dr_c240_4matic_awd_sedan-pic-1108506408816370970-640x480.jpg (103KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 640x426px

>>14809492
it sure does

>>14809492
is this a meme or something? I don't get it
it looks fucking awesome

>>14809511
No, the chassis is literally the E-Class from 98-02

>>14809507
>>14809511
No you retards Mercedes designed the chassis back in like 2004

>>14809519
chassis =/= car

>>14809521
>>14809519
and why should it be redisgned then?

>>14809519
>>14809521
I'm failing to see exactly what the problem is here.

>>14809528
>>14809533
Okay fine let's just never update cars then. Fuck progress

>>14809548
Are you retarded?
Its been updated. Is there some reason to change the chassis? They dont need to relaunch the car.

>>14809556
Cut down weight, improve safety, improve chassis rigidity and ride

How is this hard to understand?

>>14809567
and why should you change its cosemtics then?

>>14809567
Where in any of those things is changing the chassis a requirement

>>14809590
Who said anything about the cosmetics?

>>14809598
>redesign

>>14809567
Since its launch its improved all of these things, even power and gas mileage.
So why are you retards spewing shit about the chassis?

The refresh made many small but tasqteful adjustments. Dodge knows they have a good thing. Who knows how long they'll hold on to it without going to a new generation.
They will eventually have to though.

File: SRT 392.jpg (31KB, 550x324px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 550x324px

>>14809567

>weight keeps the high-torque from making you spin out
>the best safety rating out of all the 2-door pony cars
>smoothest ride out of all 3, usually recommended as best pony car to DD

They just refreshed it in 2015, unfucked the interior and styled the exterior like a 1971.

Chassis I don't really see them changing unless they launch it as something else like a Barracuda.

>>14809533

Chrysler is fucking shit and no one can save it, that's what.

>>14809624
>implying the chassis can't be redesigned

>>14809507
>>14809519
>>14809521
Thats 3 different cars. Which one is it?

>>14809708
>muh weight, I need more of it
Is this seriously a thing

>>1d 4810076
I don't need more of it, but I don't need less of it.

It's a two-door highway cruiser and more power than every other shitbox on the road and that's all it needs to be.

Not everything needs to be a featherweight track machine.

File: 2015-challenger.jpg (195KB, 1600x928px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1600x928px

>>14809708

dat interior

>>14809433
The challenger will always look this way as a general platform. They will kill off the car and make another before insulting the previous cars.
O and I can't wait on the new platform. The car is going on a diet finally

File: mickey.jpg (53KB, 812x812px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 812x812px

>>14810582
>>14810582

File: NEW TOYOTA-LEXUS DESIGN.jpg (102KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 720x960px

>>14810989

I have the car just for you.

File: 2020camaro.jpg (94KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 900x600px

>>14810999

The original Challenger had a less thick chassis. They can just go more retro and reduce the weight at the same time.

>>14810076
not every car has to be a lightweight spine shattering rollercoaster, stop being autistic

>>14811179
>Amerilards think light weigh = spine shattering
>meanwhile their full sized luxury car from Cadillac is over 1000 lbs lighter than an S Class