Carprices

File: 5f463196-36cc-45af-bd1e-887422044695..jpg (134KB, 1078x922px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1078x922px

>>14664575
because you could just buy a ford falcon and smoke it while still having a massive boot, fitting your whole family in the back and running on gas foh with that jap shit

File: 43584753.jpg (221KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1280x960px

>>14664630
Wonder why Ford of AUS never sold those engines in North America.

Best straight-six we had (i think) was the atlas (also called vortec) GM only used it in their trucks but from what i heard they can make decent reliable power.

>>14664575
Why is the R34 less expensive than the R32?

>>14664575
>>14664848
Disregard, I didn't read the first sentence of the post.

>>14664854
What am i disregarding? I want to know why the r34 is less expensive while being newer than the r32.

>>14664819

Good ol' American Ford never did ANYTHING right. They thought we'd be satisfied with a sea of V6 Mustangs and FWD Probes. The Mustang has been dogshit from the start.

It never finished anything significant.

The Foxbody had 61% weight distribution and made less than 200 HP with a 305 CID/5L V8.

It's essentially famous for being in a bunch of movies.

File: 1452373397402.jpg (10KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 184x184px

>>14664819
yfw the Atlas 4200 has a standard gen3/4 bellhousing bolt pattern.

File: bathurstgtr.jpg (49KB, 642x482px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 642x482px

>>14664865
Cause R32 has R32 tax, just like AE86 has initial d tax.

People hold them on some high horse. But forget the R32 that is worth a damn is like 1 of hand full.

>pic related, one of the hand full that matters.

>>14664575

i think it's cause you can import r32's to burgerland? just a wild guess

>>14664865
I saw the prices and asked the same question you did, I honestly don't know why. My best guess is that the R32 had better exposure compared to the R34 when it first came out, exposure from Initial D, and foreign exporting that removes cars from the market where you are.

>>14664889
So literally a shit tier car is getting the ricer tax, people can argue that the supra, rx7 fd or the 300zx or the ae86 has no successor, they are the end of the line. the r32 doesn't have that luxury, the r34 is simply a better car than the r32.
The idea that it gets the ricer tax is odd to me. I would have assumed that the r34 isn't reliable due to mah computers.

>>14664575
It sounds to me like you're comparing 34 GTTs to 32 GTRs

>>14664910
No its just tax. Living in NZ its maybe not as bad as other places. R32-33 is sort of the same price. Quick trade me search i saw no R34 GTR's.

But its a tax, At 25k in NZ when a RX7 S6-7 is 10k to what ever the fuck tard thinks his modified RX is worth.

Evolution's about the fastest/cheapest imports we have and maybe WRX's.

>>14664910
What's the deal with the R34's computer?

>>14664575
>why is this car cheaper by 7k
>Posts a car that is 20 years old
i wonder why fuck face.

why are you comparing GTs to GTRs?

>Why ?
s2000 sold in very limited numbers in australia and theyre all owned by jewish asians/old men