https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3uGJGzUYCI
>RX-8 makes 232 Horsepower at 16 mpg city, 22 mpg highway
>corvette makes 455 horsepower at 17 mpg city, 29 mpg highway
that's 223 additional horsepower, in a motor thats 4 times the displacement, and it still gets better fuel economy.
>inb4 pigfat murrican car
its only 300 lbs heavier
rotards on suicide watch
but rx8 is cute looking
>>14643400
theres nothing cute about burning oil
>>14643385
engine being bigger isnt a good thing
>>14643417
yes there is
>>14643385
13B/renesis have 2.6L displacement if you're comparing it the right way
Tbf the actual displacement for that rotary engine is closer to 4 liters if you combine all the chambers.
>>14643385
well turbo helps and there is like 10 years between the two models
>super long gear
but yeah since only mazda invest R&D in wankel engine their doommed to evolve slowly
>>14643444
>>14643438
good thing Hp/L doesn't actually matter, Hp/lb does.
>>14643425
bigger engines typically (not always) make more torque and last longer when making the same power.
>>14643476
rotaries aren't that lightweight, but they are small.
>>14643460
>like 10 years
Try like 4 hombre
The only reason they didn't compare a new rotary is mazda killed the Rx-8 after the 2011 model year...I wonder why they did that :^}
>>14643427
>chinese pedo cartoons on your car
>>14643385
Saged and reported for garbage bait
>>14643520
>gets btfo
>r-r-reported
announcing a report is a bannable offense senpai
>>14643501
10 years between the first production of the two cars
that doesn't make since otherwise
well the rx8 was quite a deception in sale people had waited for another twin turbo track car which the rx8 wasn't plus the fear of doritos killed it commercially
they needed to go off from a fresh start which i hope will be successful
>>14643542
sense* not since
>>14643542
>fear of doritos
thats a cute way of saying "the car buying public realized they sucked" right?
>>14643562
no i mean fear of something you don't know something different
a very basic kinda fear
>>14643577
its objectively worse by every useful metric, I don't think "don't understand is the issue"
>>14643605
>b-but muh BRAP
>muh Hp/lbs
>>14643629
Weight to horsepower is an important measure of how fast a car is, rotaries aren't particularly impressive in that respect.
>>14643417
is it really that much work to check your oil level?
>787b was such a good racer that Le Mans banned rotary
>I can't up my game so you can't play
>piston engines are polished shit nuggets
enjoy your engine knock
>>14643665
>787b was such a good racer that Le Mans banned rotary
B U L L S H I T
google Mazda-Kudzu
>>14643665
Its not about checking your oil, its about being dirty as fuck. Two stroke pistons aren't street legal, why is this allowed for rotaries?
Also
> upping your game
> to an engine that is dirtier, less efficient, and less robust for no real gain in power
>>14643665
The rotary engine was one car company's side project. If we had put anywhere near the same amount of R&D into it as we had the piston engine, we would be using it instead.
>>14643691
>burns oil by design
No way would we be using that instead
>>14643665
> Won one race
> Fielded more than once
> Good car
kek