4th gen F-Body

>>14596118
Definately. They last forever and provide infinite fun. You'll have to upgrade some things if you're going to be hard on it, but that's to be said with every car.

Depends on how much you're paying. Really all you want is a strong motor and ok (per f body standards) interior. You buy those things for the motor essentially. Just recently got out of mine. Full bolt ons, stalled auto ls1. Fun car for sure but lacks in certain areas.

File: Gen-4-Camaro-Design-Analysis.jpg (547KB, 1000x688px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 1000x688px

>>14596118
The best looking cars in literal history

File: thefbody.jpg (512KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 1080x1920px

>>14596118
I love mine. I think mos of /o/ thinks they're alright, but people are gonna shit on it because GM

>>14596118
I'd buy a WS 6 trans am with an ls1. In fact I used to have one but the wife hated it :/

File: Snapchat--6588345955948462064.jpg (944KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 2560x1440px

>>14597281
If you get one be ready to fix

>pop up headlight motor
>door window motor
>THE FUCKING REAR END
>leaky t tops

other than that very solid

How horrible are the engines to work on?

How do they handle compared to a Corvette?

I can get either an LT1 Vette or LS1 Firebird for around $6K and so far the vette is looking a lot more livable.

Get a turd gen and LS1/T56 swap it. You'll have a nicer interior and it doesn't look like literal shit.
>>14598085
Awful. Half the engine is under the windshield. It's hard enough getting to the rearmost spark plugs on a 3rd gen as it is.

Not as good because heavier and worse weight distribution.

>>14596118
My brother has a V6 firebird and the interior went to shit 5 years ago

horrendously ugly with awful interiors

only for people that care about mashing the gas pedal for a few seconds and nothing else

if youre a normie not into cars and want that its a good buy

>>14596118
>buy ls1
>put ls1 into literally any other car
>have car that is 10 times better than f-body

>>14598101

I'm attracted to the Corvette owner's community, too. Seems to be mostly cool people with money vs. dudes who buy baby formula on Craigslist.

>>14596889
Its like a muscle car fused with a supra.
Im ok with this.

Don't get the v6 trans am

File: 1451521846668.jpg (12KB, 210x210px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 210x210px

>>14598213
>trans am
>V-6

Can't speak about a c4, but I have a c5. If it was between c4/vs ls1 f body I would choose f body. I enjoy their styling a lot more than c4. The c4 really dates itself in terms of styling. My full suspension f body handled pretty well on the streets though. Working on isn't too bad. Kind of a bitch though as almost half the engine sits underneath the cowl so spark plugs are a pain

>>14598367
I'd tend to think the C4 exterior is a lot more timeless than the sort of "90s blob" styling of the later F-bodies.

>>14598379
True, the 4th gens will always have that "bloated" look about them. Vettes always have that svelte look for them. But I'd take an ss or ws6 based on looks alone over a c4. In my (biased) eyes it's easier to make a 4th gen look mean vs having a cool c4. Plus ls1>lt1.

>>14596118
If you want the world to know you are a giant faggot, it's worth it

look at newer mustangs if you're a douchebag

>>14599339
butthurt stangfag detected

>>14599339
Why not the sixth gen camaros? They outperform the current mustang. Base v8 to base v8