>>14286072
im sure its been done but what if you put one horizontally to the ground in a car?
>>14286109
It would be extremely painful.
>>14286074
>someone is fapping to it on the right side
>>14286109
not sure about horizontal but here you have a radial MR2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8InG6T9pxs
>>14286256
for you
>>14286297
Isn't the radial engine just a lighter engine with no other advantages? I mean, you would need 5 cam gears instead of 1 (or 2 DOHC) (Inline is the only 5 cylinder). Or could pushrods help? Also think of all the oil that sinks to the cylinder when the engine is off... Looks really cool though and would have amazing throttle response!
I always see a dancing star fish.
>>14286072
Looks sexy for some reason...
What happens if one fails to combust?
>>14286072
Le starfish engine
>>14286407
Then you have a misfire.
>what is inertia
How do I swap an R2800 Double Wasp into a Miata.
Pls help
>>14286072
Doesn't propeller engines use this piston system?
POSTING MORE EROTIC ENGINES
mmm yea
>>14287473
>Come at me, bro
>>14286072
It looks like a girl backing that ass up
Last one since no interest.
>>14286305
>>14286297
>>14286256
you fucking FAGGOTS
>>14287379
Ask this guy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2V7B7-gdRA
/o/ can't into history
http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2007/07/29/sia-flashback-mopars-star-cars/
mmmm
>>14287468
>>14287489
>>14287546
>>14288331
>>14287468
That's sexy. Does this make good power?
>>14288345
145hp at 1000RPM
>>14287460
>>14287468
MODS
O
D
S
Why are engine gifs so erotic
>>14286072
>introducing the new Chrysler Pentastar motor
>>14288622
gay dorito shit.
>>14288622
Not at all erotic.
>>14288637
>>14288637
>blowing out your seals
>not erotic
>>14288657
still not.
>>14288657
i like it
Napier deltic anyone?
>>14288722
i saw that in another thread and was thinking of linking it
>radial engine spins around it's own crankshaft
Shit's weird yo
https://youtu.be/Y0XbqHUAI-0
>>14288822
These early engines used Castor oil as the lubricant. Early pilots were well known to be covered in castor oil from these things, and shit their pants while flying from the laxative effect.
Fuck that.
>>14288894
>These early engines used Castor oil as the lubricant. Early pilots were well known to be covered in castor oil from these things, and shit their pants while flying from the laxative effect.
I knew this. Don't know why or how but I do. I know all about random useless trivia and it will never help me make money.
>>14288821
Why can't we have a vr8
>>14287379
>not having a R-4360 Wasp major
its like you dont even want 4000+hp
Commer T3
>>14289006
This was a firing animation I made years ago as a concept for an 8 cylinder version.
>>14286109
There's too many moving parts in these things. Why can't we just use something simple like a turbine.
>>14289185
>The engine we need, but not the engine we deserve
>>14289200
We can do this. Also, Chrysler helped develop this tank.
>>14289326
Do h'what now?
>>14287491
Kek
>>14286072
What are the advantages of this type of engine?
>>14289473
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radial_engine#Comparison_with_inline_engines
Was that so hard
>>14289185
how is having a dozen rotating fans any less complex?
>>14286072
What do boxers look like? Never really seen one
>>14290297
idk either, if only there was some way to look up things on some kind of knowledge base.
>>14290297
Upside down V layout
>>14289015
What is this? An engine for ants?
North-Lucas car from 1920's
>>14289526
He he..thanks mate
>>14289200
Fucking weird hentai on thumbnail
>>14290297
post moar
>>14289180
I CAME
>>14289592
all of those fans are on the same shaft, they all spin as one, therefore only one moving part.
How come we never see any of the alternate engines in this thread making it into cars or other applications?
>>14293451
No, there's 3 different shafts.
N1 N2 and N3 all have different rpms.
>>14286341
It's a total loss oil system.
Pretty cool website.
http://www.animatedengines.com
>>14289185
Mm my favorite
>>14290297
If only you had some kind of search engine that you could type keywords into...
>>14288821
w16 I'm assuming?
>>14288921
>>14288894
oh god now i know literal useless shit haha
>>14288822
Rotary, not radial. Radials stayed put while the crankshaft moved, rotaries span for cooling on the crankshaft.
Inline engines > rotaries, though. Lower frontal area for less drag, which means higher speed and lighter weight. Easy to supercharge or turbocharge, so you don't need a shitton of piping that makes your plane pigfat.
Compare the USAAF's best attempts at a rotary fighter (P47) to the RAF's attempt at an inline-engined fighter (the Spitfire), and see the difference.
One was a pigfat tub, the other was graceful and agile.
>>14295985
VR16
>>14286109
Its easy. You dont even need a big car.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2V7B7-gdRA
>>14287460
>dat camshaft that isnt reall a shaft
dat is fantastic, literally one piece doing all the work