Torque per liter

>>14038289
Neither of those numbers is relevant. Average horsepower between shift points and BSFC are the numbers that matter. We make do with peak power and MPG numbers because we can't get the specs that matter. It's pointless to compare anything else.

File: 1447725599041.jpg (29KB, 485x485px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 485x485px

>>14038339
>triggered at the 2nd post

>>14038350
probably because he makes less than 63 lb ft per liter

>>14038339
did I imply that they were relevant? I'm not trying to assess the capabilities of a bunch of cars on /o/, I just wanna see who has the highest torks per liter.

>>14038289
69.3lb/ft/L.

>>14038428
what car?

>>14038378
We should compare cupholders per lugnut. I'm at 3:20.

>>14038448
Pretty much this lol

>>14038289
>Skyactiv 2.0L
77.5 lb ft per liter

>>14038448
0:20
feels.. good man

im at 90ft/lb per liter (with turbo)

File: 1444106436671.jpg (36KB, 852x643px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 852x643px

>>14038289
>>14038516
>highest NA torque per liter
>turbo

File: 15890930834_e9204dda43_b.jpg (265KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 900x600px

>>14038500
>dat direct injection
>dat 13:1 compression

ty based mazda

>>14038448
Engines per car.

1:1 here.

>>14038523
na isnt a real car

>>14038553
Only 0.5:1 here.

>tfw I4

>>14038339
>Neither of those numbers is relevant.
If I wanna know which engine can achieve the highest in-cylinder combustion pressure using 1 bar psia (atmosphere) alone, then torque per liter is the metric I'm looking for.

>>14038448
2:16
And also 68ft/L
And also a Mazda
And also a miata

>>14038599
Lb/ft*

>>14038582
this

50 lb/ft /L twingo

>>14038500
do you really have an ND? bread on hood pls

>>14038289
84.21hp per liter in my build ls1 firebird. Heads/cam/nitrous. And 75.5 in my stock toyobaru frs

>>14038716
Meant to write tq/l. Firebird is a 5.7 toyobaru is a 2.0

>>14038448
7:32

#winning

File: 1447789455022.jpg (50KB, 353x251px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 353x251px

>>14038716
>build ls1

>>14038716
nitrous isn't natural aspiration m8

90.9 in my bone stock na rotary from the 70s
Guess piston c7cks lose at torque per litre as well as horsepower per litre

>>14038842
>less torque than a 1.8 Honda

98.5 in the truck and 2:32

77.5 ftlb/l
600cc
fz6

File: 1443312638638.jpg (48KB, 553x640px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 553x640px

>>14038448
0:0
>no car feelz

File: 1448993365902.jpg (400KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 1920x1040px

72.5lb/L.

68.125lb/L.
>First generation 4A-GE 16 valve

>>14038289
85.1: 289 with ~400lbft

About 145 ft-lb/litre to the wheels

>>14040095
>>14040124
What gasoline NA stock engine is that?

>>14040132
Ah, missed the NA part. My bad :3

>>14038763
4:16

#biwinning

Glorious 4 bolt Ford and rear cup holders. That car's whole life has been leading up to this, and nothing else.

(6:16 if you count those weird cup shaped things in the front door bits)

Though I'm suddenly scared by how comparably few bits of metal are holding my wheels on.

File: v-line-engine-wittyclutch.gif (585KB, 420x244px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 420x244px

>>14038289

>>14040132
289 Ford v8. It'll run on the top grade commercial gas; likes the racing fuel better tho. High compression, small cc heads, big cam lift, good intake manifold, open headers.

File: this faggot.gif (566KB, 320x277px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 320x277px

>>14038378
>torks

File: 1339412592445.jpg (52KB, 570x515px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 570x515px

>>14039916
>1 lug to one cup holder