Reminder M3 a shit

>>14027166
i would take the m3 please tbhfam

>>14027280
same.

BMW will get you a vapid teenager

Mustang will get you some 50+ old biker broad

File: Untitled1.png (309KB, 639x583px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 639x583px

BTFO

BTFO
T
F
O

BMW ENGINEERS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>14027332
>>14027339
keep on posting tripfags so i can filter the rest of you
>>14027166
You know how I know you're too poor to afford either? You actually think a mustang is comparable to a bimmer. Mustang a shit.

>>14027335
When are you going to hang yourself? I hate GM just as much as you do, but I'm not a dickwad about it

>>14027362
>GM Fangirl
>I literally just mentioned how I share hatred of GM

How does it feel knowing all of /o/ hates you more than Frosty?

>>14027375
He has no idea who frosty is, much less people like treequinox.

>>14027392
To be fair, I'm a newfag who only knows Treequinox from the Subaru smacking the tree meme

>>14027392
>>14027405
>>14027375
Stop replying, all he's doing is trying to get replies

>>14027413
Nigger I'm not alphonse.

>>14027166

I'm not a fan of either, but I at least understand the difference is handling and refinement and if you lived in Europe, you would find that the Ford is the expensive one which would make this choice a no-brainer.

Also who cares about 1/4 mile times?

>>14029955
The BMW understeers more and rides stiffer. You're right about the nicer interior though.

>>14030029
Both of those things are false. Have you ever sat in a pre-2015 mustang? Americans can't make suspensions.

>>14027346
The sad thing is they are bimmers have been shit since the e39

>>14027166
Current gen numbers:

Power/torque (HP/lb-ft):
>Mustang
>435/400

>M3
>425/406

Curb Weight (lbs)
>Mustang
>3705

>M3
>3540

Weight to Power (lb/HP)
>Mustang
>8.5

>M3
>8.3

0-60 (seconds, from Car and Driver):
>Mustang
>4.5

>M3
>3.8

1/4 Mile (seconds@mph, from Car and Driver)
>Mustang
>13.0 sec @ 113 mph

>M3
>12.0 sec @ 119 mph

60-0
>Couldn't find comparable sources

Lateral Acceleration
>Couldn't find comparable sources

Price (base in US)
>Mustang
>$32395

>M3
>$63200

>>14030769
It would seem that the M3 is more superior to the Mustang now than it was in 2011, but considering there's almost a 2x difference in price, the Mustang definitely has better value. If money is no object though, then the M3 is clearly better.

>>14030666
irl this is true.
doesn't show in mag tests tho as ford has been sending prepped cars out for the last 20 years

File: 2016-BMW-M4-GTS-images-1900x1200-wallpaper-33-750x500[1].jpg (85KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 750x500px

this is faster than the gt350r

perhaps BMW got its balls back

>ITT: Americans trying to justify buying a shitstang over an M3 when we all know they couldnt afford the M3 either way.

Americans cars handle like shit, inb4 hurr durr lapt times magazines etc

You're nuts if you think those are stock cars.

>>14030818
Let's see your new m3 shitposting faggot

>>14030821
Found the mustang owner.

>>14030831
I have Toyotas and a Nissan retard

File: S1973link.jpg (66KB, 580x343px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 580x343px

wonder why so it's much cheaper senpai

>>14027332
Hockenheim short
M4 1:12.80 Type R 1:15.80
Sachsenring
M4 1:37.22 Type R 1:41.16
Nurburgring GP (3.7 km)
prev gen M3 E92 1:44.86 Type R 1:46.90
Contidrom
M4 1:34.41 Type R 1:36.70

although the Type R is damn great for a FWD car

>>14027166
The GT is great for the price but dat m3 handling is unmatchable

File: Untitled copy.png (110KB, 368x509px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 368x509px

Ford can't compete

>>14030929
>Same suspension as an Escape shitbox

BAKA DESU SENPAI

File: 40 keks.jpg (10KB, 227x200px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 227x200px

>>14030962
even the escape had individual rear suspension kek

File: Ford Escort Mk2 Rally car.jpg (247KB, 750x498px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 750x498px

>>14030962
>doesn't like real handling
enjoy your traction control faget

File: K1576.png (7KB, 465x335px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 465x335px

>>14030929
>At a press conference, Ford stated that to include an independent rear suspension would have added $5,000 to the showroom price of the car.

new mustang has irs wtf are you talking about