[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

S2000 "coming" back?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 57
Thread images: 9

File: s2k.jpg (50KB, 900x596px) Image search: [Google]
s2k.jpg
50KB, 900x596px
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/honda-s2000-sports-car-return-mazda-mx-5-rival?page=1

Thoughts
>>
>>14006929
So its going to be like 10k more than a Miata?
>>
>>14006929
Why is coming in quotation? Is the s2000 ejaculating?
>>
File: Screenshot_2015-12-08-18-07-11.png (990KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2015-12-08-18-07-11.png
990KB, 1080x1920px
>>14006929
Nice Miata, bro.
>>
File: 02.jpg (188KB, 718x1325px) Image search: [Google]
02.jpg
188KB, 718x1325px
>>14006929
Hopefully it will be better than the miata this time.
>>
>>14006929

>rwd vert
I DONT CARE
>>
That's a ridiculously sexy render
>>
>>14007023
Kinda hope the make a coupe version like the F type
>>
>>14007023
this guy doesn't even like fun. wtf.
>>
>>14007047
you know what's fun?
a fucking car that doesn't have it's drive train and lacking a top as it's top fucking bullet points
>>
>>14007023
Vert or not, an S2000 is an S2000, and if it's designed as a convertible it won't be as bad as something that was designed as a coupe.
>>14007022
The S2000 was way better than the Miata at the time, it was just reflected in its price.
>>
>>14007022
You can't even shit post correctly homo
>>
>>14007053
>rear drive isn't fun or important
m8

Also it's harder to convince marketers to put light weight, fancy suspension design, etc as marketing points.
>>
>>14006929
>believing an unsourced article

Let's see an interview, or at least a concept. Then we can talk.
>>
File: 1449596883255.png (198KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
1449596883255.png
198KB, 640x360px
>>14007064
>being this assmad
>>
>>14007065
NO
Rear drive is not inherently fun or important
go fuck yourself back to Jalopnik
>>
>>14006929
I want to believe this so much, but I'm not getting my hopes up until I hear it from Honda.

There already was an S2000 successor and Honda cancelled it. The 3.0 V6 Honda made for the car was used in the NSX test mule.
>>
>>14007081
Oh, you're that troll. I'm gonna give you one more reply.

RWD allows for inducing oversteer whenever you want, generally for fun times, and contributes to a more balanced chassis. It's very hard to have a front or all wheel drive car with balanced weight distribution, an FR is not nearly as difficult to achieve roughly 50/50 front/rear weight balance. Balance is great.

Also with no CVs going to the front wheels, steering lock is improved.
>>
>>14007091
Yeah, and apparently the S660 being beefed up into the S1000 isn't happening. Damn shame.
>>
File: F2Two6R.jpg (760KB, 1010x1385px) Image search: [Google]
F2Two6R.jpg
760KB, 1010x1385px
>>14007074
0/10
>>
>>14007106

Incredibly wrong
plenty of FWD cars have outperformed RWD
>>
>>14007428
>fun is now benchracing
wew lad
>>
>>14007435

but you can oversteer in an FF car
>>
Not sure why all these magazines are calling it a Miata competitor. I would expect it to cost 40k, maybe lower if they do multiple engines for a base model. I really want this happen, but I'm doubting these rumors. Besides the fact that it has no real source, Honda has being saying they want a three tier mid engined sports car line up. Unless they make it mid engined and still call it the S2000, which I'm sure S2000 fans will be mad. They might be planning 4 sports cars all at different prices, but I really doubt it. It would be cool if they had the S1000 at like 20k, then S2000 for ~40k, then that "baby NSX" for 80k, and then the NSX for 160k. Not going to happen, but would be very cool.
>>
>>14007441
Yes, but you can't induce it at any point in time like you basically can with a RWD. Just clutch dump or mash the gas depending on how torquey the car is.
>>
>>14007462
??????
>>
>>14007462
The fuck are you talking about, have you ever driven in a proper setup fwd, look at Jap tuning crowd, the only thing you need to induce oversteer is a thick rear sway bar, lower cog helps but isn't necessary
>>
>>14007480
>>14007479
Induce oversteer *at any point*, learn to read. Using a weight-transfer technique at the start of the corner is doable in any car, sure, but for pulling a 180 or rotating more in a corner you want the rear wheels driven.
>>
>>14007495
So the answer is no you haven't
>>
modern hondas are so fucking ugly
>>
>>14007500
>power oversteer in a FWD
>>
>>14006929
octopus beak design language
>>
>>14007513
he may be implying that >>14007495 doesn't know about lift-off oversteer
>>
Saw one of those near school one time
>>
>>14007565
Can't happen at any point though, you need a kind of tight corner.
>>
It'll come out 10 years too late and weigh twice what it should.
>>
>>14007495
its not even just jap cars that prove this wrong
>>
>>14007587
.....Why would the place the car is designed affect this?
>>
File: p1.jpg (277KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]
p1.jpg
277KB, 1200x800px
>>14006929
Releasing a car like this would be a good move by Honda. Hopefully Soichiro will haunt the boring designers sketching pig fat Accords and make them create a proper sports car.

Also, having no top makes lightness and a sleek body design almost mandatory features. With coupes and sedans desginers are free to make soaps.

>Inb4 Murano
>>
>>14007711
no its just an ancient idea that having no roof lowers your centre of gravity
it saves no weight overall
>>
>>14007746
He says it encourages light weight cars, not that it makes them.
>>
File: S2000-wall2-1280.jpg (525KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]
S2000-wall2-1280.jpg
525KB, 1280x1024px
>>14007746
No, dude. I meant this >>14007751
>>
>>14006929
it's been coming back from 10 years
>>
>>14006929
>tfw when a brand new car actually looks really fujucking KKKool
>>
Engine. I bet it won't rev too high nor sound nice. Then there's no reason to choose this over a Miata.
>>
>>14006929
No 9K redline? No point.
>>
This car is ugly.
>>
>>14012032
>is the engine even running?
>>
>>14006929
looks a bit like an Audi, I don't like it, gives the impression of being pigfat just as Mazdas rotary concept.
>>
File: MIATA-FRS.jpg (69KB, 1000x552px) Image search: [Google]
MIATA-FRS.jpg
69KB, 1000x552px
>>14006929
MX5 rival? So slower than a Toybaru.
>>
File: CL1enM8VEAAOZWm[1].jpg (46KB, 436x325px) Image search: [Google]
CL1enM8VEAAOZWm[1].jpg
46KB, 436x325px
>>14015407
>So slower than a Toybaru
reminder
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2016-mazda-mx-5-vs-2015-subaru-brz-comparison/
>1:29.91 for the MX-5, 1:31.27 for the BRZ.

enjoy your liteal kuck car faggot
>>
>>14006929
not really digging the grill styling, but at least it looks reminiscent of the s2k. the nsx looks nothing like the original.
with a less edge front end it would look good
>>
>>14015437
Aww you found one test where the fagmobile won, well done Car And Driver show the Miata getting dicked (just the way it likes to be).
>>
>>14015448
stay mad the toyobaru is slower kuckold
>>
>>14006929
The stancefags would fucking REJOICE.

It's like sneakerfags line up around a store for days because some fucking shoe got retroed after 10 years
>>
>>14006929
They'll fuck it up like they did the NSX

>heavy
>turbo
>no feel

The original S2000 is still a fantastic coupe.
>>
>>14015462
Slower? looks at lap times, why you are right 3:18.6 is slower than 3:20.8 how remarkable that time has stopped working in the traditional way.
Thread posts: 57
Thread images: 9


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.