Horsepower Thread

>>13982221
between 150-170 on my 2.0l

>>13982227
nice, very efficient.

File: c0914ec609[1].png (1MB, 721x657px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 721x657px

None. Because this fucking part cost me heat in my car, and blew the blower fan with it.
I can't drive this bitch with freezing ass temps.

Otherwise, 220. Lincoln Towncar. Dyno'd at the last meet I went to.

>>13982221
290, out of a 2.0L

>>13982221
Bout 80hp if I'm lucky

1990 gmc sierra slx 5.7l v8 so maybe 200hp

>>13982251
wimp get a wool coat and suck it up

>>13982221
Here's me redlining the car, it's fun to drive, despite being floaty and bloaty.

https://youtu.be/i93gYdVKXoM?t=1m10s

>>13982262

I've been driving with pajamas under my jeans. With double socks. One under the pajamas. And one over the pajamas.
An undershirt tucked under the pajamas. A thermal tucked under the jeans. A regular shirt over that. And then a leather coat.

I'm fucking freezing.
I won't make it through the winter.

Send help.

190 in my V6 Tacoma. My highest HP vehicle yet.

File: 20150709_094404 (Large).jpg (563KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 1920x1080px

>>13982221
260/350 Expedition
250/300 Mustang

>>13982274
Hey VINbro thanks for checking my mom's hyundai sonata, it's the one in my vid and pic related.

>>13982296

Oh, nice. Happy to have helped a good son help his mom.

>she will never know you beat the shit out of it

>>13982291
Wash your car you filthy faggot.

>>13982291

>NJ plates

Where you at, anon?

>>13982311
old picture, the mustang was in storage. Its clean with a new top now.
>>13982312
NYC now bud.

>>13982273
cotton socks under wool socks
cotton undershirt under flannel under wool shirt (pendletons are amazing) under leather coat (leather is meh at keeping in warmth good at keeping out wind and rain wool retains like 80% heat even when soaked)
thermal longjohns under insulated jeans

320.
160 per liter isn't too bad I guess.

>>13982320

Even with NJ as bad as it is, why would you move to NYC?

>>13982332
school. Can't pay out of state tuition.
They're both absolute shit.

>>13982337

Ah makes sense. Good move then.

The older I get, the more I realize how shitty NJ is. It's a wonder so many people stay here their entire lives.

File: reallyblewmyhairback.jpg (163KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 960x720px

A whopping 155hp, whoopee.

Think I'll aim for 350 or so for my next car.

>>13982342
I'm moving down south after I'm done with school. Can't stand this shitty weather and mindset.

>>13982350

Can't say I blame you. I've considered going South as well. The only immediate issue I see is that I'm not fond of hot weather. But I guess if I don't go all the way South, it wouldn't be bad.

>>13982358
they still got winter along the mason dixon line.

>>13982365

And I bet their Winters are a bit more mild than here. I can dig that.

>>13982366
except when it does snow and everyone loses their shit

>>13982252
With forced induction?
What do you drive?

>>13982366

Spent 20 winters in NY and about to experience my 6th winter in Georgia.
They're roughly the same.
NY just gets less sunlight.

1.6L Turbo, 201 (Claimed)
3.5 V6, 286
5.7 V8...probably 200hp cause 1970's truck

200 on my 2.0 k20

>>13982374

I hear this from everyone. I can't tell if it's a good or bad thing. Potential offdays from work for snow I could handle is nice (assuming paid) and likely barren roads for me to drive on would also be nice.

But the lack of competence with snow here is irritating. I'm sure it'd drive me mad down South.

>>13982399

Really? Even as far down as GA? That's really surprising. More sunlight is nice, though.

275, plenty to have fun with

File: 2d2cfe04e6[1].png (18KB, 544x166px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 544x166px

>>13982418

Kentucky had that big ice storm that was a state of emergency for the entire state.
It was terrifying.
I don't think NY got hit with it as bad, buy KY certainly did.

Just because you go farther south doesn't mean it gets better.
Until you actually get out of the climate.

Europe gets as much sunlight as Canada, but the climates are quite different.

File: 972c0923-b305-41ee-8fad-47a9e96359fb_zps2229f6dc.jpg (35KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1024x768px

Wheee
On shitty Chinese Nankang summer tires in the cold right now
Basically ice skating if I touch the accelerator

>>13982473

Plenty of surprising information here. I guess there is more to climate than geographic location.

It seems Eureka, California still has pretty much my ideal climate. Never had plans to move to Cali, but the climate there makes it very tempting.

>>13982221
Mine is 2.4l I4 160hp 155lb/tq
I like driving my parents 2013 durango RT 360HP hemi its fast for big suv but its poor quality the trans is crap and paint isn't that good there are some bubbles. maxed the thing out a couple weeks ago but its governed to 118mph

>>13982494
Cali is the best, its December, and you will still get run over if you're not going 80mph on the 405

>>13982502

>Cali is the best

This is what the media has told me. I will believe it until I see otherwise.

435
2015 mustang gt

>>13982274
Lol what year? 03 5VZ here.
My HP is prob less than factory at this point, motor is sitting at 198k.

>>13982511
Cali is bullshit when it comes to emissions, so that's why no ones got a straight exhaust, so you're right about that, but we can at least have grip all year.

320 hp 340 torque

2.0 l DOHC turbocharged

>>13982511
Just avoid 90% of SF and all of Berkeley or else theyll sour your outlook of NorCal.
Fuck Berkeley.

>>13982523

Oh yeah, the smog bullshit. Well I have no plans to straight pipe my truck or do a cat delete, so as long as it's running fine, I sense no issue. Grip is king.

>>13982530

Not the first time I've heard this. I'll keep that in mind.


On a thread-related note. Some of the power I'm seeing from such small engines amazes me.

>>13982494

The best place to live is Lake Chapala in Mexico.
Simple as that.

>>13982541

>best place
>Mexico

I cannot trust you, anon.

>>13982221
330 3.0l v6 twin turbo

>>13982546

It has a high of like 30C and a low of like. 25C. Or something like that.

414 bhp M3

Dreaming about a 575 bhp M5 or 605 bhp RS7 Performance

File: muh_ls1.jpg (177KB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 852x480px

Are we talking new or current condition? Because those are probably very different numbers

>>13982221
About 180hp when brand new but I'll be fucked if its more than 150 now

>>13982273
If the temperature where you are doesn't go below 0 F then you need to man the fuck up

>>13982640
I wouldn't be too hard on him, here in California, it's a bitch when you're dressed for 80F and all of a sudden it drops to 40F and you're in a t-shirt and cargo shorts.

Get about 190hp on my 3.2L bt50

>>13982587

I like the small temperature range, but if I were to move somewhere, I'd want it a bit cooler. And somewhere that isn't in Mexico.

>>13982609

Always quote the new numbers. Never admit to the inevitable loss of power over time.

12.

>Tfw lawnmowers pack more than your ride :(

1.7L
~350 to the wheels

340kw 640nm L98 6.0 V8

>>13982796
bullshit

>>13982408
>5.7
I sense a 350 Chebby,what year and model?

>>13982221
237, 2.0L 4B11T.

>Lancer Ralliart

>>13982805
Not lying. It's a 1.7L, custom built V10 twin turbo. It actually feels like a lot more than 350whp due to how light the engine is.

File: 1426905299487.jpg (10KB, 200x303px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x303px

>>13982869
not even going to ask for bread because i know youre full of shite

>>13982880
Money can truly buy anything my friend.

Being a trust fund baby is the best.

>>13982869
you're a retard

File: 1443261528952.jpg (67KB, 481x637px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 481x637px

>>13982892
And you buy a 1.7l twin turbo v10 capable of an earth shattering 350whp

File: Screenshot_2015-11-20-19-26-14.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>13982805
Mazda B6T, Forged Pistons, Forged Rods, Kelford Cams, Link G4, ARP everything, ported head, custom manifold, Garrett t3/4, 670cc injectors, FMIC, tial 38mm, Greddy BOV, e85, MSD sci, etc etc etc. Having an issue with the cat making a noise at the moment t b h f a m

>>13982900
Yeah. And it's sitting between my V12 SL600 and my Diablo. I can buy literally any car in the world, I wanted something one of a kind.

File: _20151205_214421.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

>>13982904
>>13982904
>>13982904

>>13982918
needs whale-tail and 18s m8

>>13982945
I built the motor before I had a body,then I picked up this beat up piece of shit in terrible condition and plonked it in, just needs smaller wheels, paint and an interior and its good to go.

File: 2015-06-01_00-15-44.jpg (248KB, 1468x871px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1468x871px

265 or something

File: DSC_0132.jpg (3MB, 4608x3072px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4608x3072px

Putting down a decent 235hp to the wheels

>>13982954
ah it dont look to bad. there was some local guy round here running an rs2000 lump in an orion used to dick on alot of things

130ish

>>13982904
Cat delete

File: 0309131305.jpg (457KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 960x1280px

>>13983214
Woops

2.4l of fury

286HP in my E34 540, supposedly

2.3L SAAB 9-5 with 273HP and 440Nm(324ft-lbs)

File: 20150910_160420_resized.jpg (2MB, 2656x1494px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2656x1494px

168 when new, probably at 160 or slightly below now

File: chuckle.gif (253KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 320x240px

>>13983214
>Cat delete

210HP/420NM out of a 2.0L diesel

File: mondeo v6.jpg (90KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 640x480px

>2.5L V6
>20mpg
>170hp

based Ford

File: More_0ebce3_5708367.jpg (52KB, 500x889px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x889px

>>13983377

... the fuck?

Basically the same stats as >>13983341 (2.4l V6), but my long-range highway driving MPG is 35.5 on my summer tires

>>13983381
I would get 30mpg on a long run but mixed driving is always 20

File: 10872934_944571932239367_6767624535382456375_o.jpg (97KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1280x720px

Bone stock 6.0l so 300hp/600tq

old oodi urS6 makes about 300awhp cause lolturbos

old civic makes about 240whp cause lol turbos

I think I'm addicted to turbos.

>>13982273

you must be an ectomorph or lanklet

File: 20150911_110653-1.jpg (3MB, 3787x1320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3787x1320px

Sure is pleb in here. I'm averaging ~430HP /car.

>>13983414
>said as you have no garage and park amongst shitboxes in an open parking lot

>>13983414
Averaging?
But there's only one car in that image, then three turds to the left of it.

>>13983391
Alright, then it makes more sense, mixed driving would probably be similar then

File: 12189665_140039343018079_3973584031870092055_n.jpg (17KB, 408x408px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 408x408px

possibly both of them.
79 mb 300d with 950k on the clock.

>>13983442
if the other is not kill

Vortec V6 4.3l LP6 Xvin
Rated at 170 bhp
And 240ft lb torks

It's a good burn out machine

If I got one horsepower per cubic inch, my truck would make 460hp. But I don't think it does.. Damn 80s era smog and detuning shit

>>13982221
114 HP at best out of 2.4 liters
FEAR ME

>>13982350
>going to the South
That's a mistake.

>>13982667
Mexico is fine if you have money.

>>13982273
Get a heater that plugs into the cigarette lighter outlet or an inverter and a small space heater.

>>13982836

78 C10
Single cab, long bed

>>13982649
SoCal feels?
>50° is brutal af
>don't understand how people operate under that let alone 0 fucking degrees

File: attachment[1].jpg (168KB, 1228x921px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1228x921px

212hp and 275ftlb from 4.5L

well at least it was 22 years and 290k miles ago

>>13984603

I don't have money.

>>13984644

This shit boggles me. 50's and 60's is pretty much perfect weather. If it can be in that short range all year long, I'd love it. Sprinkle in a few hotter and colder days per year and I am set.

3.5L V6, 268 hp (2GR-FE)

File: 20150201_145226 - Copy.jpg (3MB, 3984x2241px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3984x2241px

188hp get on my level negros

>>13985421
>50's and 60's is pretty much perfect weather.
No, that's trash. 80s is good. 70s is good too. 90s is still comfortable, but getting hot.

328 horsepower
269 ft/lbs

VQ37VHR

>>13985558
That's a beast of an engine, Have you got it in a camry?

>>13985577

>"and here we have the ferocious B230 in its hibernation"

Its a B230, right?

>>13985630

hell yeah

b230ft


VOLVO REPRESENT!

2.8L I6, 85hp

File: IMAG0048.jpg (930KB, 2688x1520px) Image search: [Google]

930KB, 2688x1520px

Probably about 180whp in my shotbox

>>13985653
180 on the wheels isn't bad, that car's light, My grandmother's got a 160hp K24 Accord DX from 2004 and that thing zips around while being heavy

>>13985664
Yeah plus I get pretty good torque, probably around 230 lb ft at the wheels

File: DSC_0314.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

I dont know actual numbers, but maybe somewhere around 425hp and maybe a little more in torque.

File: Vorne.jpg (142KB, 1454x1076px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1454x1076px

320 hp out of a 2.3L

will get more once i get it tuned. but i'll wait until it's out of warranty.

File: muhv8bay.jpg (300KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 960x960px

>>13982221

6.2L V8 producing 426 HP

File: IMG_1690.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

3,5 v6 - 217hp/220ft/lb when new (2007 malibu)
4 speed auto makes it a slow car, but it pulls well when passing/flooring it to get away from idiots on the highway
wishing i had the 3,9 v6 in the SS

170 from a 1.8 litre

>>13986643
>leaves in engine bay

casual

>>13986636
>but i'll wait until it's out of warranty.

Why? With a Cobb Accessport you can just flash back to factory.

>>13987293
ford knows if its been tuned by key turns

>>13987293

Newer Ford PCMs record key cycles since the last flash/flag flash events so that dealers are able to tell if a vehicle has been tuned or not.

>>13987320
>>13987325
It only stores around 100 key cycles, which you can cycle through without having to start the engine.

>>13987293
I dont understand these people either, especially diesel fags.

>I have all this tech that will give me better fuel econ, run cooler, and give me more power with no drawbacks, but I'll wait until im out of warranty before i do it

>>13987478
>blow up modded engine under warranty
>now have to buy new engine out of pocket

>>13987488
This, especially on diesels the dealers will know about tuning and deny your warranty claim.

File: NrozBZt.jpg (731KB, 2591x1935px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 2591x1935px

>>13982221

Your valve cover and / or timing cover is leaking, your alternator is probably douched in oil too.


Every Lambda I've ever seen does it.

File: dyno.jpg (228KB, 1271x917px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1271x917px

post dynos fags

File: Ididit.jpg (113KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 960x720px

4.6l triton v8
220hp ish,

inb4
>the wires anon

i know, i cant find my other picture of them loomed... calm your tits

File: 1203151714.jpg (4MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4160x3120px

>>13982221

3.8L 3800 Series 2.

253HP Last time I dyno'd it.

File: Ididit2.jpg (110KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 960x720px

>>13988158
i found it and renamed it so i can find it again

also i plan to either 5.4L zf5 swap my truck because I can, also might supercharge it if I do.
I dont know yet

>>13988192
You will never do either of these things.

>>13982408
>1.6L Turbo 201

Somebody got a veloster turbo

>>13988217
the f150 could also come with the 5.4L and zf5 trans so yes I can, all i need to do is tap some holes and pop some shit out.

3.8L V6 @193hp. Hopefully can add a few mods to bring it up to stock GT tier. Just bought it and had a limited budget and wanted a Mustang.

>>13987921
Yeah idk why my mom's car does that, I check the oil every 5000 miles to see if it's still good and the levels are fine, and the engine is in really good shape for 80k still pulls real hard.

File: loxos3.jpg (578KB, 2000x1125px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 2000x1125px

4.0 v8

made 250 hp when new.

205hp out of a 2.4l inline 4.

>>13988254
If you're talking about the later 260hp GT power level, I doubt you're going to achieve that sans forced induction.

M62B44, pre-VANOS. Stock dynos at 280WHP, so puts the crank HP to around 310HP versus 282 advertised.

I have an intake, no cats and a tune. I'm hoping for 320-330 at the crank.

380 @ s/c K20A

File: 2015-08-16 16.30.36.jpg (786KB, 1497x694px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 1497x694px

485

>>13988929
Croist m8 noice

>>13982221
138 on my 1,6l
Swift Sport 2013

File: f798434c-dc87-4b90-a873-d4cf358fb68f-atlg.jpg (142KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 600x400px

a whopping 160-200 est. HP from muh 4.3 Hemi
A mind boggling 45 bhp from my 1.2 corolla

Hoping to buy a VE Commodore 6spd manual to replace daily when that dies
From another classic, i wanted a TC cortina that could produce 150hp from its 4l I6

File: 20150831_155350.jpg (1MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1152px

250, from naturally aspirated six silky smooth cylinders carved by the gods, deshita sempai

Oh and can't forget 22 mpgs in the city and 38 highway. Haven't even put my cold air intake on yet either.

File: cen7.jpg (72KB, 799x595px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 799x595px

>>13989222
You could keep it in the family and get the Chrysler equivalent of a 6 cylinder Cortina...

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3920x2204px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3920x2204px

>>13989280
nice modeo mate

>>13989301
Sexy XJ40 anon

Fucks a modeo?

>>13989301
>modeo
lol. It's literally a facelifted version of the one you've posted.

>>13989303
sorry, meant mondeo

anyway I think the oem spec for my engine is about 220hp crank, definitely far less now

>>13989306
far more than facelifted.
more like fordlifted.

File: 12196032_10207947833193048_3056117604701621930_n.jpg (263KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 960x540px

a whopping 130 from factory
probably like 110 now, if that

File: 112311231.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

about 140, feels extremely slow though
one of the slowest cars ive had, i still miss me T5

for some reason I still love this tank though

>>13989306
Different engine, better looks too
>>13989308
Dude the x type shared a platform with the mondeo. My X300 is what your car would've looked like if British Leyland didn't run out of money in the 80s ;););)

Jokes aside it's dead reliable and I get complimented every single day.

>>13989299
heard they handled like shit from factory, and they come up for sale so rarely and most of the time with the shitty 4 cylinder or 215

but my god if i could ever drop a 265 into it with a 4spd that car would become pure sex, i would trade my valiant for it

>>13989324
noice. my jag's far less reliable but just gets stares. people just follow it with their heads, faces in disbelief
Naturally it's a real jag because you have to pump the throttle to get it to start and it leaks.

>>13989334
Haha
No problems on my side. I'm at 260k kilometers. Very un-jaguar like. I've had it stall twice and that was because my alternator belt was literally on the verge of snapping and I turned my a/c off. Muh sensitive ecu.

Few minor wire repairs and a burnt light module. I'm gonna look into the suspension in spring because I'm sure the rear shocks are dead, can feel it going over manholes and shit like that.

Perfect daily driver and it even handles well. I'm getting a series III soon to tinker with, so I'm sure I'll be overloaded with electrical bullshit.

What problems have you encountered? I love the color desu

>>13989334
Also don't pump the throttle, it's fuel injected bro, change your spark plugs if it doesn't start all the time

>>13985588

Way too fucking hot. If it tops out at 80, I will be fine. I can say okay to 50s/60s or 60s/70s. Anything above or below is less desirable.

southern california 70 all year at sea level. feels good man.

File: muhmanagement.jpg (375KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 2048x1536px

a blistering 240ish horsepower

330whp, 365ft tq.
2.0t full bolt ons and a fairly aggressive tune. When I can afford a based 6266 and money to build the motor I want to see 550whp

File: 2.png (1MB, 1220x642px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1220x642px

a little over 400

File: 20151204_2314331.jpg (72KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1280x720px

190 hp from a V6 displacing a MASSIVE 4.3 litres
Combine that with the 260 lb.ft
You got some shitty as mileage for a small pickup.
>pick related
>It's possible successor if I get my money straight after graduation

hatch 416whp
coupe 135hp
q45 276hp
concours 14 155whp

File: 2012-05-18_12-34-06_187.jpg (173KB, 816x464px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 816x464px

honestly i have no idea
i do not have my car dyno'd and it feel like quite a bit more than stock

the problem is the parts have claims that sound outrageous.
the downpipe said "15-20 HP and 20-25 lbs/ft of torque"
uh huh
and the intake says similar bs and i have a 3.5" catback and so on.

and no tune. so i cant even fucking guess
it also makes a difference if its cold out.

>>13982906
Bread on hood

>>13985605
Yep. For a family-oriented midsize sedan, 0-60 in 5.8 seconds and around 30mpg is pretty respectable.

75

5.0, 420hp

>>13983497
Need to upgrade to the V8 vortec bro 4.8L, 285HP 285lb/ft (probably)

>>13988244

Kia 5 door forte

File: DSC_0085.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x2160px

170bhp 1.4L

>>13990537

5.0, 215 HP

>1998 Ford Explorer....

File: IMG_20151125_190334.jpg (165KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1024x768px

Miata: 260 to the wheels
Sierra: I'm guessing around 250
Beetle: ~120 maybe

File: IMAG0238.jpg (2MB, 2688x1520px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2688x1520px

M45 - 340hp
Thunderbird - 240rwhp/300rwtq
Explorer - 220hp or some shit

Tbird will crack the 300rwhp mark soon

>>13991073
>Explorer - 220hp or some shit

Its 215 if its a late '97+ V8

>>13987488
>>13987712
it will blow up out of warranty to, I fail to see the reason to wait

>>13989351
sorry, fell asleep
haven't had too many problems I suppose
viscuous fan clutch seized
front suspension just fell apart, i.e. ball joints
tranny didn't want to go into park
general overheating, I think clogged rad
rear wheel bearings were basically seized
muffler literally just fell off

probably a lot of other stuff but got a lot of stuff done preventatively with mechanic mates

>>13982221
volvo s60 T4, 250 horse.

>>13982221
>how much horsepower are you guys packing ?
all of them

File: 2006_Ford_Mustang_GT_engine.jpg (444KB, 2272x1704px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 2272x1704px

>>13982221
4.6L 3v 300hp

File: engine.jpg (344KB, 1024x814px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1024x814px

3.5L Ecoboost V6. someone running the exact same tune as me dyno'd at 383rwhp (completely stock hardware, 91 octane performance tune) but he's at sea level and I'm at 5280. either way I should be north of 400 at the crank.

File: 2015-09-21 19.37.05 - Copy.jpg (413KB, 1594x897px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1594x897px

Dynod at 260hp/350tq at the wheels.

File: harem.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

car: 415
bike 1: 97
bike 2: 126

File: WP_20150613_14_00_32_Pro.jpg (602KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

602KB, 1920x1080px

321 hp - BMW z3 m coupe, 3.2l I6
212 hp - Honda accord type r, 2.2 i4
128 hp - Aprilia Rsv mille

>>13982221
200 on my 2l

Just filmed this today, I abuse this whenever I can, High ass RPMs, Burnouts, and it still keeps ticking.

https://youtu.be/Wlx5bwyzQoo

>>13988174
What's in it? That's more than the same motor with a super charger on it.

Over 300 in my RWD 2-door

This year was ~500ish hp out of my 2.0 shitbox.
My dd makes right around 300-320 at the crank probably with 2.4l

>>13992836
>full of shit
it's like you fuckers don't even try to be believable when you lie

>>13992854
;)

253 fwhp, turbo 4g61
89 dodge colt

probably about 280hp from my gtp. full exhaust, intake, colder plugs, 3.4" pulley and pcm flash tune
>>13992854
>being this new

>>13993414
oh and it's 3.8l

>>13988752
That old car looks plush, and it's got the roar of a V8.

>>13982418
Supppp duddeeee

>>13994525

Yooooo supp??!!

>>13982221
99 Ranger 4.0 has about 160 horsepower, but it moves the truck just fine.

>>13989323
Dude, get your muffler sorted, that looks really fucked.
And judging by the taillights, you got the 144 hp version, same as my 855.
I plan to swap in a B5234T, sorting out everything that needs to be swapped atm.

>>13991073
F a m, get a new cam, your lens is scratched af.

>>13990637
I'd rather run it into the ground that turn it into a project mini truck

S10 chasis is shit

>>13988265

Because that cylinder banks timing chain slings oil into that corner and eventually causes the rtv gasket material to fail and weep oil.

>>13982257
5.7l v8 but just 200 hp
Murica fk yeah