is the dodge omni with the 1.7 the same as a rabbit with the 1.7?

>The Volkswagen engine used an enlarged Chrysler-designed cylinder head and intake manifold and produced 75 hp (56 kW) and 90 lb·ft (122 N·m).
Literally one minute in Wikipedia.

>>13816658
i mean the car and the rest of the car, like the brakes etc

>>13816667
ya

>>13816667
No. It's the same engine, but nothing else between the cars is interchangeable.

>>13816658
damn my 1.3 from '93 makes 75hp and 120lbft, but dat dohc chain driven goddess.

File: 734535_614717991874861_1677447965_n.jpg (167KB, 701x960px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 701x960px

>>13816793
This. Also. Being an L-body car, it's so much easier to get parts for since the Omni's had so many sister cars (coughk-carcough).

That said, I'll take an Omni any day of the week over the Golf/Rabbit

>>13816813
oh i thought they shared parts with the rabbit
interesting.

File: 10953028_802181469851798_4647188691539011436_o.jpg (130KB, 1052x670px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1052x670px

>>13816832
Nope. Beyond the engine, it shared NOTHING with the Rabbit.
/o/ loves Omni's and K-cars though. They're cheap, plentiful, and react well to turbocharging since so many of them were turbocharged.,

>>13816849
god i love omnis

File: 91rtad.jpg (343KB, 895x1210px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 895x1210px

>>13816853
What about the K-Car relatives?