Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia

>>81433
like you have to look further than Shillary to find neo-Communism.

>>81434
t. Right Wing Extremist

>>81433
That isn't what the article says at all. It's a misleading headline. If you read further than the second paragraph, you find out things like this:

>The F.B.I.’s inquiries into Russia’s possible role continue, as does the investigation into the emails involving Mrs. Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, on a computer she shared with her estranged husband, Anthony D. Weiner. Mrs. Clinton’s supporters argue that voters have as much right to know what the F.B.I. has found in Mr. Trump’s case, even if the findings are not yet conclusive.

>“You do not hear the director talking about any other investigation he is involved in,” Representative Gregory W. Meeks, Democrat of New York, said after Mr. Comey’s letter to Congress was made public. “Is he investigating the Trump Foundation? Is he looking into the Russians hacking into all of our emails? Is he looking into and deciding what is going on with regards to other allegations of the Trump Organization?”

>Mr. Comey would not even confirm the existence of any investigation of Mr. Trump’s aides when asked during an appearance in September before Congress. In the Obama administration’s internal deliberations over identifying the Russians as the source of the hacks, Mr. Comey also argued against doing so and succeeded in keeping the F.B.I.’s imprimatur off the formal findings, a law enforcement official said. His stance was first reported by CNBC.

>>81460
Those are other points raised by an angry democrat, which seem somewhat reasonable save the tone of desperation.

The main point of the article is literally that the FBI has not found strong evidence that trump is connected to Russia. Heavily supporting that he was not involved in the data breaches.

>>81507
Wrong.

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national

>The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.

>Some states have also recently seen scanning and probing of their election-related systems, which in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company. However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government. The USIC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assess that it would be extremely difficult for someone, including a nation-state actor, to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyber attack or intrusion. This assessment is based on the decentralized nature of our election system in this country and the number of protections state and local election officials have in place. States ensure that voting machines are not connected to the Internet, and there are numerous checks and balances as well as extensive oversight at multiple levels built into our election process.

>>81533
We aren't disagreeing. You are saying Russia is involved, there is evidence for that apparently. The article says TRUMP has no significant Russian ties.

Stop posting walls of text to argue different points.

>unverified and frankly fanciful stories of trump being in league with Putin
>Media goes nuts

>Confirmed sale of US uranium to Russia via Clinton foundation
>Media strangely silent

I'm no trump voter, but the level of yellow journalism in America is sickening

>>81564
eh. why the fuck would Russia buy Uranium from us? Seriously? ........