Wall Street Journal Against the Clintons

>A Hillary Clinton presidency will be built, from the ground up, on self-dealing, crony favors, and an utter disregard for the law.
While this is completely true, and in fact understating the problem, the same can be said for Trump. What's the point?

>MSM is actually going after Clinton

I wouldn't call it that, these shills are vehemently anti-Trump and always will be. It's controlled opposition

>>80966
Can it? And why has this point only been pushed in regard to Trump and not Clinton by the media over the last 6 months?

>>80966
Juan, you have to go back

>>80965
so we can CONTINUE the outdated Republican stink in government?

>>80971
RACIST

>>80966
>utter disregard for the law
>Trump

I'm a Trump supporter so I'm trying not to be too biased here, but seriously, where do you get this from? The whole 'doesn't pay taxes' thing? That was not illegal.

>>80965
To be expected from the Murdoch/Fox press.
But I will read

>>80976
Ironically, Clinton is more old school Republican in spirit than she is classic Democrat.

>>80980
the funny man on tv said so, so it must be true

>>80980
Sexual assault is illegal, anon.
So is not renting property based on skin color.

>>80980
Also
>part of platform is literally "war crimes are awesome"
>not disregard for the law

>>81016
>being retarded
Okay.

>>80980
For most people that look into the issue?

Its been from his treatment of former business partners, the stories coming out about women, his shady Russian connections (no not the rumored wikileaks shit), racist practices, and his complete ignorance of how the legal/political system works.

We get he isn't a lawyer but you have to be 90% willful retarded to think you can just call special court hearings and criminal hunts as president. If Obama said even half the shit Trump has said, he'd be (rightfully) looked as an ignorant nigger who thinks president = dictatorship.

Any pass Clinton seemingly gets is usually because.

1. Republicans can't stop putting their foot in their mouth. Makes them just look like they cry wolf.
2. Clinton is an innovator in the field of oiling up the media. She pretty much wrote the book of setting the narrative.
3. Good chunk of the Clinton attacks have been against the wrong one. Bill isn't running.
4. Public has a short attention span. People kind of short of remember good stuff like "kids, education" with her. But don't know shit about the 20+ scandals inbetween.

>>81064
>not renting property based on skin color
>>illegal

pthhhhhhhhpt. and yet entire industries make their living on doing just that.

I'm all for ethical treatment of people. But Trump is just part of a systemic issue in the USA. Everyone is in on it, he's the only one to own up to it.

>>81102
>there's a systemic issue, one that everyone knows is an issue, and there are laws designed to remove that issue
>we should perpetuate that issue by saying that it doesn't matter at all when it comes to choosing the president, and that his willingness to break that law is not indicative of a willingness to break laws

Both of them are crooks, America is fucked

>>81065
>warcrimes are awesome

I think funding terrorists and supporting the removal of legitimate governments is a war crime

>>81075

>People kind of short of remember good stuff like "kids, education" with her. But don't know shit about the 20+ scandals inbetween.

I think "emails" is now more associated with her than "kids, education." Then again I was less than 12 during the (Bill) Clinton years so my memory base on the former first lady is rather limited to her recent activities as secretary of state.

Also another reason Clinton seemingly gets a pass is many of these issues have been covered previously (and quite extensively). It's called the "news" because it's new, and in a way the constant trickle of leaked emails is just adding to an old story everyone already knows about. This will of course change if the FBI decides to reopen the case or if they finally leak an email that actually reveals something new instead of just more evidence of "she has a well-oiled political machine" which I'm pretty sure everyone already knows without additional evidence.

>>81135
Hi, I see you've made a mistake based on your refusal to acquire information before posting.

Let me help you out, the conversation you just replied to starts here >>80966

Glad to help!

>>81155
not sure if CTR or just plain stupid.

Are you saying that Trump is also guilty of funding terrorists and removing foreign governments? Or what other war crime is Trump guilty of?

>>81212
>le CTR meme
>>>/pol/

>>81217
you still haven't answered my question here >>81212

>>81212
Trump hasn't committed a war crime because he's never been in a war or in charge of a war. However, he's said on several occasions that he would commit war crimes if elected, like torturing captured enemies and 'flattening' cities in Syria where ISIS exist, regardless of civilian casualties.

>>81064
>Sexual assault is illegal, anon.
Good thing he never commited sexual assault nor talked about it, and no amount of pearl clutching can change what he said in that audio recording to anything beyond private banter.

>So is not renting property based on skin color.
Good thing that never happened either.

Stop getting your news from Comedy Central.

>>81075
>For most people that look into the issue in the manner they're told to by their favorite news outlets and celebrities
FTFY

>>81217
>CTR
>Meme
Real and documented outlet, actually.

Hillbullies are in full denial mode.

>>81220
So the answer is no, he hasn't commited any war crimes. Trump has said many things, doesn't mean he will actually do them. Hillary, on the other hand, actually has commited war crimes while in the position of Secretary of State. And if we go by the things she has said, well, she wanted to rig the Palestine election, so that's electoral fraud right there; she wants to go to war with Russia, etc.

Why don't we just stick to the things both candidates have done?

>>81222
>FTFY

This is true anon, but as the saying goes, where there is smoke, there is fire. And in these two cases both people have problems.

But just to put your funny man thoughts at ease.

I casted my vote for third party.
I get my political news from C-Span and the various autobiographers/researchers they host.
I work in a sector that makes it morally unsound for me to support Hillary in good conscious.

You don't have to like Hill. Its god damn obvious to anyone with critical thinking skills that she is practically Nixon Jr. (which is laughably ironic). But you are bloody idiot if you truly don't see Trump for what he is:

A bully that buys his friends.
An unskilled man who managed to lose millions in fucking casinos of all things.
A fragile man that will go after anyone who dares make fun of him.
A con artist of epic proportions. Although must admit this is proving to be a pro.

Vote for who you want but just be honest that Trump is 98% every stereotype of shitty rich hedge fund babies come to life.

>>81064
Thank god it was in conversation and he didn't fuck his secretary while president.
Then we'd have trumps wife goin for presidency in a decade

>>81225

>Hillary, on the other hand, actually has commited war crimes while in the position of Secretary of State.

Alright, someone fill me in on these war crimes, because the only notable things to come out of her stewardship of the State Department seem to be emails, Benghazi, and Clinton Foundation shit, none of which are war crimes.

>Why don't we just stick to the things both candidates have done?

It would be nice if Donald had held a public office so we would at least vaguely know what he would be like in office. Instead we have to figure out what he's done in business and extrapolate that to public office, and the man is seriously opaque on that issue since we don't have any hard numbers that aren't based on his word, leaked documents, or hearsay.

For better or for worse, we have a clear picture of what Hillary Clinton has done. The same cannot be said for Donald Trump, who has consistently scoffed at transparency with flimsy excuses and grandiose statements.

>>81276
>For better or for worse, we have a clear picture of what Hillary Clinton has done. The same cannot be said for Donald Trump, who has consistently scoffed at transparency with flimsy excuses and grandiose statements.
Is this a joke?

>>81276
>Alright, someone fill me in on these war crimes
They're probably talking about Libya or Benghazi. They could also be talking about the Russian uranium deal, but calling that a war crime is hyperbole. They could also be talking about the questionable funding of anti-Assad rebels that she signed off on (which ended up going almost directly to ISIS), or likewise the sale of weapons to SA in 2011 which are now being used in Yemen.

Libya is probably the meaning, though. Searching for "Clinton war crimes" gets a bunch of outraged opinion pieces, and ones like http://thefreethoughtproject.com/clinton-email-leak-exposes-war-crimes-frmr-attorney-predicts-indictment-60-days/ appear to be directly pointing to her actions in Libya.

>>81212
>flat out just admitting you're retarded
No idea why I'm surprised.

>>81222
>if I just ignore facts then reality is altered
Yeah, that's exactly how that works.

>>81220
And Obama didn't close Gitmo. And almost all deaths by drone attacks are civilian.

>>81064
>Believing Clinton's cronies about Trump's alleged "sexual assaults"

Yeah, it's illegal. This is indisputable.

However, what happens after that fact is that Hillary has a LOT of goons of both genders ready to throw themselves out to the public to try and ruin Trump in whatever way is possible.

There are a LOT of women out there who would be persuaded to vote for Clinton if given a reason. What "better" reason for it than to slam on Trump with some sexual assault allegations, true or untrue as they may be?

Burden of proof is a bitch, and Hillary is more than willing to throw fakes out there to "create" proof, as fake as they may be.

>>81351
[citation still need]

Hillary is going to jail. Cry more.

>>81375
And Trump doesn't?
He brought a handful of literally who women onto a presidential debate to accuse not his opponent, but the husband of his opponent.

I was ok and just fine until I heard about what they did in Haiti.

At first it was 2 billion and they stole most of it.

but a few weeks later its now 6 billion and they stole 90% of it or something, this lead me to Infowars.com where I learned the whole story thanks to that crazy fun guy.

Im just thinking back, the only reason I registered to vote for the first time in my life.

The clintons lowered minimum wage in Haiti, working in Haiti 40 hours will bring in about 13$ a person thanks to the clintons.

My cat costs me about 25$ a week in food alone.

Hell yhe im motivated, I dont know about trump but Im motivated enough to vote against the Clintons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ecEb4tEPic

Im sold

>all these butthurt /pol/tards ITT
The Wall Street Journal is owned by NewsCorp and is not a liberal paper, geniuses.

>>81463
It is center left.

>>81464
It's only center left if you're a right wing extremist. Everyone else considers it to be to the right of center.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_bias_in_the_United_States#Conservative_bias

>>81464
> WSJ is center-left

lol

>>81466
>Using wikipedia as a source.

Trump Train!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL7bNtl_Sfw

>>81468
>complaining about wikipedia as a source
>not knowing what a citation is.
Those little bracketed numbers mean something. You should really learn what that is.

>>81473
Then cite those not Wikipedia anon.
You are not allowed to cite Wikipedia in scholarly articles why should it be different on anonymous internet image boards?

>>81485
>You are not allowed to cite Wikipedia in scholarly articles why should it be different on anonymous internet image boards?
Because this is not a graduate school and if you're that lazy that you can't bothered to click on a tiny little number link if you don't believe what the wikipedia article says then you're probably too retarded to be worth talking to in the first place.

God I can't wait for the election to be over so /news/ can go back to being about lighthearted shit like wars and diseases and local murders and accidents.

>>81233
>Vote for who you want but just be honest that Trump is 98% every stereotype of shitty rich hedge fund babies come to life.

Yeah, but at least with Trump the Supreme Court doesn't turn blue for the next 50 years and start eroding our constitutional rights.

>>81491
>Yeah, but at least with Trump the Supreme Court doesn't turn blue for the next 50 years and start eroding our constitutional rights.
The blue people are the ones giving out rights to people. (gays, unions, transsexuals, etc) The red people are taking them away. (restricting your right to read porn, have a abortion, early vote, etc)

>>81495
The blue people take away rights to they want to gut the first and second amendment. Both sides hate civil liberties just not always the same ones.

>>81496
>they want to gut the first and second amendment.
According to whom? The NRA?

>>81497
Hate speech laws are anti first amendment. http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/19/no-hillary-clinton-supreme-courts-heller-decision-wasnt-toddlers/

Both sides suck and both sides have good points I wish their was a party where we could pick and choose and have compromise to have the best of both worlds I'm tired of zealots.

>>81075
>who thinks president = dictatorship.
you know he can order the assassination of anyone on the planet right?

>>81499

>order assassination of top-level Chinese diplomat
>whoops WWIII

The only people the president can assassinate are dudes living in 3rd world garbage heaps with an overt drone strike. Go to even the 2nd world where they have competent intelligence services and they'll know you ordered the hit. And god help you if you order an assassination on a 1st world citizen, because not only will they know, they'll broadcast it until you are forced to resign or are impeached.

>>81379
>illiterate retard demanding citation
What for?

>>81375
>Clinton's cronies
>when Trump admits it

>ignoring war crimes
Neat.