Google News Is Adding a “Fact-Check” Tag.

>>78997
>Using google for news.
>Expecting non-biased and accurate reporting.
There were pictures of googles CEO sitting with Obama during his campaign. No fucking duh they have an agenda.

Insert gratuitous plug for

http://spider.today

>>49918

Fucking autocorrect.

http://spidr.today

>>79017
>someone couldn't 'possibly have political leanings and yet write non-biased repoted
whhy do repubslicans always think this

>>78997
>wsj
>right wing
??????????????

>>79126
Confused by this too. WSJ isn't right wing, few right wing outlets even exist

>>79078

Your side seems to think the same about us, bub.

>>79126
It is considered right-wing by the mainstream media not by the extreme radical rightists that use 4chan

>>79133
WSJ is center left.

>>79135
>>79127
>>79126
https://www.quora.com/Among-large-US-Newspapers-which-are-considered-conservative-and-which-are-considered-liberal

>Major papers typically with a particularly conservative editorial page bent include the Chicago Tribune, the New York Post, the Las Vegas Review-Journal, the Dallas Morning News, and the Wall Street Journal.

>Typically liberal editorial pages can be found at the New York Times, Boston Globe, and Washington Post.

>>79137
They must mean economically conservative, or soft conservative in general. Quite a lot of these papers will often agree with liberals more than their actual would be conservative base

>>79078
Did your post make it tingle in your poopy hole?

>>79078
>giving any media entity the benefit of the doubt
>2016

If anything they should be trying to prove their worth to us.

>>79078
Why do Democrats always type like morons?
Why do Democrats blindly accuse Republicans of discrediting sources when liberals do nothing except discredit sources?
Protip: the NRA isn't the evil giant you've been fooled into seeing. They're a lobbyist like the rest, except they represent actual donating Americans, unlike the pharmaceutical lobby.
Sure, they also represent gun companies, but those are just Americans who started a company, and are seeking to ensure their buyers retain rights that we already have. (You know, those ones that liberals don't like.)

>>79264
>Why do Democrats always type like morons?
Because grammar is overrated.
>Why do Democrats blindly accuse Republicans of discrediting sources when liberals do nothing except discredit sources?
Because republicans do this 24x as much as democrats, on average.
>Protip: the NRA isn't the evil giant you've been fooled into seeing.
The NRA gets most of its funding from gun manufacturers, not from dues.
They're a lobbyist like the rest, except they represent actual donating Americans, unlike the pharmaceutical lobby.
Whoever told you this was lying to you.
>Sure, they also represent gun companies, but those are just Americans who started a company,
You're defending multi-national corporations headquartered in Europe but who manufacture things in China.
>and are seeking to ensure their buyers retain rights that we already have. (You know, those ones that liberals don't like.)
You have the right to be in a well regulated militia, that's about it.

Channel 4 News (ITN) have been doing Fact-Checking for some time. They are all serious journalists.

>>79277
And we have found the progressive.

>>79280
And we found the /pol/tard

>>79277
Importing guns is outrageously complicated and expensive. You have no idea how gun manufacturing actually works.
There are a handful of 'multinational' gun companies. You think this because some liberal told you so. Most gun companies build in the US, sell in the US, and are based in the US. You do know there are more companies than Ruger, Colt and Bushmaster, right? Probably not, because these are the only companies that liberals know of.
>You have the right to...
Yes, I'm well aware that the right of the people to keep an bear arms shall not be infringed. Perhaps you should re-read the 2nd Amendment. You seem to have forgotten the rest of it.

By the way, your emperor Hillary has run her entire life on lobbying. May want to soften up on the anti-lobbyist speak.

>>79334
Oh look, an unwitting corporate lobbyist on 4chan. How rare that is.

>>79350
>Corporate
Nope, just a guy represented by a lobby.

>>79363
Nope, you're an unwitting tool of multinational corporations.

http://www.factcheck.org/2013/01/do-assault-weapons-sales-pay-nra-salaries/

>The National Rifle Association of America, on the other hand, reported $227.8 million in revenues in 2010 — nearly half of which came from member dues ($100.5 million) and program fees ($6.6 million).

>>79369
There you go again.
1. There is no such thing as an assault weapon.
2. Gun companies come in all shapes and sizes, and -shockingly- support gun rights.
3. You're an angsty liberal who cannot accept anyone who has opposing views.
4. You're talking about guns, and you can't identify a Ruger 10/22 from a hipoint rifle.

>>79378
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=assault+weapon
>Assault weapon is a term used in the United States to define some types of firearms. The definition varies among regulating jurisdictions, but usually includes semi-automatic firearms with a detachable magazine and a pistol grip, and sometimes other features such as a flash suppressor or barrel shroud.

Oh and I'm not even a liberal and I own a Walther. It sounds like you're so far to the right that you think anyone to the left of your far right extremism is a liberal.

>>79379
You can google 'queef' and get a definition, that doesn't make it legit.

>I own a walther
And I own a Hillary sticker.

>>79380
These things have a legal definition as well.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=US+jurisdictions+where+assault+weapons+are+banned

>>79384
Bans put in place by know-nothings like yourself. That's why ARs are still legal in all but one state. Even AKs are legal in all states.

>>79403
>Bans put in place by know-nothings like yourself
And let me guess, only you and your right wing extremist buddies who are the REAL Americans know the REAL truth, right?

>>79404
Ugh...
Yes. We do. We are the boogeymen coming to kill your children. The NRA personally buys all mentally unstable people their first gun. All sane people want to ban guns, and only backwoods rednecks support gun rights.

You win, buddy. You're obviously a hardcore liberal, which renders this all pointless.

>>79405
Wingnuts like you are so far to the right that you don't even know that Ronald Reagan signed the first Federal Assault Weapons ban into law in 1986.

>>79406
Ronald Reagan was a Neocon not a traditional conservative.

>>79407
Neocons have dominated the GOP (90%+) since Nixon. Neocons are the conservatives. Big tent politics is a bitch, no?