Why aren't the US hackers doing their jobs?
If they even work half as hard as the Russian ones on Clinton's email, Donald Trump's tax returns would be public by now. http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/15/politics/donald-trump-taxes/
>>72484
1. There are 320 million Americans. Yes, some among us claim they are hackers.
2. American hackers seem more interested in celebrity nudes and extorting bitcoins.
3. The IRS uses computers from the 1970s and 80s to store tax records that aren't on the internet can't easily be hacked.
4. It's more likely that Donald Trump's accountant will get hacked and his tax information stolen rather than leaked from the IRS.
>>72487 #
But even Donald Trump's son has a copy, apparently. He did not flip and count the pages. The page count suggests that the document is on his computer in pdf format
>>72492
I have no doubt that the information is spread across several Trump org computers. I imagine that it's a little more complex than a 1040-EZ and he can't just use Quicken TurboTax.
>>72487
Given the growing number of conservatards in the U.S., it's more likely script kiddies will leak something defamatory of Clinton instead; or spoof several "leaked" emails that conveniently incriminate her.
Stop pretending that your leftist boogeyman actually exists.
>>72499
>THE RIGHT WING BOOGEYMAN IS GOING AFTER CLINTON
>YOURE CRAZY THERES NO LEFT WING BOOGEYMAN
You're the same type to say that the NRA is wrong for lobbying when Clinton receives more lobby money than any politician today. Your Boogeyman is lining Clintons pockets, and she's so old school politician that she still thinks she has to hide it from Americans.
Also, before you start your shit, no, I'm not pro Trump.
>hack originates from Russian IP address from range than has been associated with hacking before
>media says this is proof that the hackers are Russian
fucking dumb
>>72506
(insert reaction image of a tinfoil hat)
/news/ really needs image support for non OPs.
Also, here's your (You)
>>72526
Is this a non-sarcastic post that's implying it's some conspiracy theory that Clinton is making huge dosh off special interests, and not a well document, public, occurrence?
>>72528
Shut up, dissident. Be a good non-racist and put on this meme hat.
>>72526
Ohh, I get it, you're trolling. Very funny. You almost fooled me.
>>72484
There are. You're just an uninformed rub who only follows the big flashy headlines. Not every hacker is making the paper simply because what they do is low key, covered up by X, or isn't sexy enough to sell.
>>72539
So then...Trump is unhackable?
I find it hard to believe that Clinton emails are the only thing hackers are capable of getting
Hackers release Trump's taxes, validating his claim that this is "rigged" and "unfair", and if linked to the Democrats, provide a torpedo that could single-handedly sink their election chances.
Compared to the status quo, where Trump self-incriminates by not releasing his taxes.
Go back to salivating over maps of Kiev, Ivan.
>>72499
Muh Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
You are the retard, buddy
>>72506
>Also, before you start your shit, no, I'm not pro Trump.
Why are you supporting Clinton if she's so corrupt then?
>>73703
Nobody has ever supported Clinton you Fucking idiot. We literally live in 1984 here in the good ol USA
>>72484
I still refuse to believe that the hackers were Russian every time.
I think they're just banking we won't trust documents from other countries and most people will never even bother to look
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHqgHFcmAOc
>>72484
>Russians are going after Clinton
There is literally no proof of this
>>73751
https://news.fastcompany.com/who-are-cozy-bear-and-fancy-bear-the-russian-hackers-that-allegedly-breached-the-dnc-4010576
>>73740
http://gizmodo.com/gop-congressman-actually-russia-has-hacked-both-parti-1786647740
>>73756
http://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-chief-responds-concern-cyber-threats-us-election/story?id=41740869
http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/26/technology/russia-dnc-hack-fbi/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/05/fbi-hints-that-hillary-clinton-s-private-server-got-hacked.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/30/russians-likely-responsible-for-clinton-campaign-hack.html
>>73757
Still nothing but speculation, as long as they are being released by Julian and not Russians themselves, you cannot conclusively say it's from the Russians.
>>73759
Nice try Vlad, but the Director of the FBI said it was the Russians.
>>73760
And what evidence did he provide?
None.
.05 cents has been deposited into your account.
>>73761
>None
Next time try reading the news articles, you might learn something.
>>73762
I have read plenty.
There is no conclusive evidence it is the Russians.
>>73763
Hint: It was the Russians. Pull your head out of the sand.
>>73766
Almost impossible to track down who did it = It was the Russians. The onus is on you to prove it friend.
>>73768
>Almost impossible
What makes you think this?
>>73766
Hint: we don't know who did it, the Russians are just your convenient scape goat.
It could very easily be the Chinese or any other number of nationalities.
There is no conclusive evidence that it is the Russians.
>>73772
>Hint: we don't know who did it, the Russians are just your convenient scape goat.
We do know who did it though. Director Comey said specifically it's "likely the Russians". He wouldn't say that unless he had forthcoming evidence.
>>73773
No, he supplied zero evidence to back up his statement, it is just easy to accuse the Russians of doing it.
>>73774
Please post the source that filled your head full of this bullshit so I can debunk it.
>>73775
I don't have to prove a negative, you have to prove the positive.
The only thing on your plate is unsubstantiated accusations by a U.S. government organization. Mind you the USFG has a high interest into blaming the Russians for absolutely everything they can think of to weaken their regional and international presence.
I don't have time to sit here and debate with a little autistic shit like you, either post CONCLUSIVE evidence (there isn't any) or fuck off back to ŕeddit where you came from.
>>73775
Source: pravda.ru
How can you not see that he's on Putin's payroll?
>>73777
>everyone who doesn't consume unsubstantiated accusations is on "Putins payroll"
I'm at college in Michigan. Putin is paying for my education. This is totally factual.
>>73776
I genuinely don't understand why it's so hard to believe for you. I've already posted 4 conclusive pieces of evidence which you have erroneously discounted for not matching up with your pro-Russian narrative. What more do you want? A signed statement from the FSb?
>>73777
Oh I know he's a shill, I'm just making it more obvious for everyone in here in case someone was confused.
>>73779
There is no conclusive evidence it was by the Russians, there are only accusations by a foreign government who have high interest in blaming Russians for anything they can.
Does this mean I support the backwards shithole that is Russia with horrible HIV, drug addiction rates, little to no hindrance on government and so on and so forth?
no.
Will I blindly blame all of the world's problems on them?
no.
But you will because it fits your narrative
>He's a shill
>he
No.
>shill
>>>/pol/
>>73780
Okay sure, Vlad, you're just a poor college student in Michigan and totally not in the FSB. That's how you know FOR CERTAIN that it wasn't the russians, despite the head of the FBI, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, and ThreatMatrix™ (or whatever other cyber-security firms the DNC uses) all agreeing that it's the Russians.
>>73782
>agreeing
>providing proof of
Two completely different things.
>Poor college student
I'm by no means poor.
>>73783
Circumstantial evidence is still evidence, Anon.
>>73784
There are no fingerprints on this "crime". There is nothing to conclusively link the Russians to hacking the DNC.
Come back when you have some.
Otherwise you're relying on solely on an appeal to authority, an authority that has interest in making Russia take the blame for something you can't prove they did.
>>73785
Well it's a good thing the source for your claims is your ass.
Meanwhile, in the real world:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-17/fancy-bear-has-ties-to-russian-presidency-cyber-expert-says/7854658
http://www.vocativ.com/359025/olympic-hackers-likely-behind-dnc-breach/
https://www.ft.com/content/d8495c86-7b47-11e6-b837-eb4b4333ee43
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hackers-cybersecurity-crowdstrike-dan-larson-dnc-world-antidoping-agency-state-elections/
http://www.ibtimes.com/russian-hacking-democratic-party-officials-warned-hackers-are-impersonating-them-2416239
http://myinforms.com/en/a/41451297-fancy-bear-hacking-group-has-ties-to-russian-presidency-cyber-expert/
>>73786
>likely
>accuse
>point to
Where is the conclusive evidence?
>some random vatnik claiming to have hacked the DNC
such convincing evidence.
>>73787
Here's a clue for the clueless:
https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/who-is-fancy-bear/
>>73788
>/blog/
>>73773
is this the same director that said Hillary did nothing wrong but if other people do what Hillary did they would face prosecution?
you need to wake the fuck up
Allahu Akbar!
The U.S. must take Monroe Doctrine now.
The U.S. must withdraw American Forces from all Foreign Countries now.
Stop America's doing its all wars now!
I love American99% and the U.S.
China, Germany and Japan must loosen Germany's, Japan's and China's monetary policies now!
China, Germany and Japan must stimulate Germany's, Japan's and China's domestic demands now!
Japan and Germany must issue a lot of construction bond now!
The U.S. must tighten its monetary policy now!
Japan, Germany and China are evil empires.
Islamists' true enemies are Japan, Germany, China, FRB, top1%, Wall Street, American Military Industry and DOD!
Allahu Akbar!