Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Witnesses refuse to testify in hearing on Clinton's email 2016-09-13 21:48:17 Post No. 72209
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Witnesses refuse to testify in hearing on Clinton's email 2016-09-13 21:48:17 Post No. 72209
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Witnesses refuse to testify in hearing on Clinton's email
Anonymous
2016-09-13 21:48:17
Post No. 72209
[Report]
>Three witnesses ordered to testify Tuesday before a House committee investigating Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server asserted their constitutional rights against self-incrimination and did not appear or refused to answer questions.
>Bryan Pagliano, the former State Department computer specialist tasked with setting up Clinton's server, did not attend the Republican-led hearing. His attorneys said in a letter to the chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee that Pagliano will continue to assert his constitutional right not to testify.
>Pagliano spoke previously to the FBI under immunity, telling the bureau there were no successful security breaches of the server. But he said he was aware of many failed login attempts that he described as "brute force attacks."
>Pagliano also refused to answer questions last year before a House panel investigating the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya.
>"He has never made any statement or taken any action that would constitute a waiver of his constitutional rights and there is no reason for anyone to believe he might suddenly depart from that position," Pagliano's lawyers wrote in the Sept. 13 letter to Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, the Oversight committee chairman.
>Chaffetz said there will be consequences for Pagliano's refusal to appear and for "thumbing his nose at Congress." He didn't specify what the penalties would be.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/3248b019982b4c628189bbc4ddcbd7d7/republicans-call-tech-experts-testify-clintons-server
>>
>>72209
Still trying to milk the emails for something they can use in the election, eh? Well good luck with the 9th consecutive congressional hearing on the subject. May the GAO never reveal nor add how much this one cost to the sum total of the others.
>>
>asserted their constitutional rights against self-incrimination
more like they dont want to end up on hillaries mysterious death list
>everyone_i_dont_like_mysteriously_dies.jpg
>>
She is in so much trouble right now that this will only get crazy in the next few days. Wait for the wiki leaks post expected this week. With the collapse, the phenomenon, the claims of bad memory due to a brain injury durring the FBI questioning, she is falling apart.
>>
>>72249
Republicans have been saying "She's done for!" since 2002.
>>
probably just trying to get out of e-mail inquiry #77 a little early so they can rest up for #78
>>
>>72209
They know they fucking get wacked if they did.
The only way that would happen if you gave them immunity and processed Clintons, Obamas, and the entire fucking DNC under the RICO act.
But that ain't ever going to happen until a republican is elected and that's a huge IF.
>>
>>72266
Pagliano already has immunity. He won't tesitify because it's a witchhunt and the Congressional republicans want blood so badly that they would put him in jail for years for something frivolous like speeding and traffic tickets while being employed by Hillary if they knew the press wasn't keeping tabs.
>>
>>72213
Yeah man, refusing to hand over documents or testify before congress is such a nothingburger
Yawn what's next for the GOP to try and hit Hillary with? Another phony conspiracy about her health just because she collapsed on camera? *yawn*
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1