Ghostbusters Actress Leslie Jones Targeted In Cyber Attack

>>69183
I feel bad for the women in the new ghostbusters, they should have rejected the offer to be cast in the movie, because their reputations and careers are now going to be tarnished over this shit show cash grab.

Stop remaking classic 80s movies, stop remaking classic 80s movies with "progressive themes", especially after you promised a remake with the original cast. These women don't deserve this shit, but they shouldn't have been apart of it in the first place. It's just sad that they have to suffer for some corporate hacks who sat around a table and said

>hey we could make fucking bank off of ghostbusters, and lets make it more progressive! Fuck the original! We'll be rich rich rich!

>>69185
literally this. except i don't feel even slightly bad for her, (see link related www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/20/double-standards-leslie-jones-racist-twitter-history/)
they need to come up with some fresh ideas big time.
>the maze runner is just the cube for pussies
>hunger games is just battle royale for pussies
>the jungle book remake is the jungle book for pussies
STOP

We already have a harambe thread OP.

>>69185
>progressive themes

So now every time an actress is cast, it's because Hollywood has a "progressive" agenda to shove down our throats? The tinfoil area is that way >>>/pol/

I don't care what the director's agenda might have been. It doesn't objectively matter what gender the cast is. And I'm quite sure YOU are only further sensationalizing the issue by chimping out over it. There's no such thing as bad publicity, so stop giving these issues attention if you truly wish for your progressive boogeyman to go away.

>>69215

>So now every time an actress is cast, it's because Hollywood has a "progressive" agenda to shove down our throats?

no but when the sole purpose of a movie is "its the same thing as the last one but with all women instead of men" its starts getting into "progressive themes" territory.

>>69185
>I feel bad for the women in the new ghostbusters, they should have rejected the offer to be cast in the movie, because their reputations and careers are now going to be tarnished over this shit show cash grab.

Same. It reminds me of the actors in the new Fantastic 4, but this time they have to deal with feminist and anti-feminist too.

I dread that remake of Ocean's 11 with only women. Yes, that's happening.

>>69215
You could successfully make this argument and id agree with you
FOR ANY MOVIE THAT *ISNT* THE NEW GHOSTBUSTERS
/Pol/ false flag detected

pretty sure she must have been targeted not because of ghostbuster but because she is literally retarded as proven by her twitter activity.

>>69215
it's so totally transparent how can you even question the motivation behind the all-female ghostbusters... it's like socialist realism, it exists for one purpose and one purpose alone. to push an agenda, it's so staggeringly blatant
>>69307
>ocean's 11
>only women
you are fucking shitting me

>>69215
tinfoil is >>>/x/ though

>>69183
Protip- "leaked nudes" are studio propaganda to stir up interest in movies and actors/actresses. They can't show these actresses nude in film due to image, so they "leak" nudes.

This came in at the tail end of the Ghostbuster's movie run, so is anyone surprised?

>>69333
>literally
There's that word again

so...if you dont take nude photos of yourself then youve nothing to worry about. these idiots set themselves up and then blame other people.

>>69537
Um excuse me you need to stop victim blaming that is highly problematic and sexism even okay thanks

>>69191
Rather than give breitbart pageviews, I'm just gonna go check out her twitter.

>>69215
You must be retarded if you can't see how the movie was trying to be progressive.

>>69183
She's a racist cunt. Her tweets were filled with racist comments long before Ghostbusters' rape.

>>69307
>I dread that remake of Ocean's 11 with only women. Yes, that's happening.
WHY. FOR WHAT FUCKING REASON. it was fantastic when it was first made, they made a pretty good rehash/remake, WHY!

>>69540
any faggot that starts his phrase with 'um' deserves to be punished. grow up and stop acting like an over-privileged child.

>>69333
i've heard her twittr had some really weird stuff on it, but i dont know any examples. can you tell me?

>>69577
i think it was a joke anon.
>>69574
is this what he (>>69333) was talking about? what was she saying

>>69408
it can be used in a non literal sense too.
its become a bit like "fuck"

> inb4 "gamergate"

>>69191

>shitbart

no.

>>69183
How are women so stupid?

>>69355
It's called Ocean's Eight, and it's currently slated for 2017

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5164214/

>Concept is a female lead spin-off of George Clooney's remake of the original movie

A spin-off (aka REBOOT) of a remake of an original movie... I mean, O11 (2001) was good, but at the same time that too was a reboot...

God damn, movie producers need more original ideas.

>>69577
woosh

>>69371
Pretty sure you could se a couple of dingleberries on those nudes.
If what you say is true wouldn't they at least go through the effort to clean ms. Gorilla with a water hose.